Sheriff deserves it more. Dillon seems like an excuse to have a recent character.
"Deserves"? Bah, what makes the Sheriff such an ideal character? When I look at him, I see probably the most boring character created by Nintendo. Especially because there's nothing worth noting about him, he's a blank slate when it comes to personality and appearance. Nothing screams "unique" about him, and I don't know anybody who would personally want to play as such an obscure random character that nobody really knows about. At least with the other retro characters, they actually have a fanbase and are important to Nintendo's history as the Sheriff just steals the spotlight as being falsely named as "Nintendo's First Character". Nintendo's first actual character should be considered to be Jumpman, as he actually had a name that was not his occupation and an actual unique design with unique characters (Yes it's kinda dumb to think like that, but that's just how I see it).
Ice Climbers were NEVER referenced by the time Melee came out.
Uh, never heard of Animal Crossing? Ice Climber was playable in that game.
IWho said anything about Sheriff being as iconic and recurring as ROB & Mr. Game & Watch? Nobody that's who. He simply fits the criteria in terms of throwbacks to important parts of Nintendo History. And he is an important part of Nintendo History for many reasons
So you're telling me that nobody, not even you says that Sheriff is near the same league as Mr. Game & Watch and R.O.B.. But yet despite that, he still fits the same criteria despite not being anywhere near as important or iconic as them?
That's quite the contradiction.
I said he's next in line after ROB & Mr. Game & Watch. It was solely your choice to assume what area/criteria I was referring to. Though it would make you less foolish to attempt to find out.
Heh, if that's the case. Explain to us what makes him next in line then, rather than trying to make yourself feel smarter than the rest of us and expect us to figure it out.
- No room for DK Jr because Dixie & K. Rool
- Sheriff represents the Arcade specifically. The current Donkey Kong is different and represents a different series as does the current Mario. Sheriff would represent solely the arcade.
- Yes, a cartoon character is always more important to Nintendo.
• There is no support for DK Jr., and if there was it's practically non-existant.
• Why do we need an Arcade rep if we already have so many arcade stars? Even Sonic and Mega Man are arcade stars too. It seems rather unnecessary to represent something when everybody else already does that.
• In this case, the cartoon character who lead to the creation to the most well known video game character would be considerably more important to a company than a completely obscure and unknown character from one game that nobody knows of.
Your logic is flawed. You say you agree that Sheriff doesn't compare to G&W and ROB, but you still say he would represent the same thing. So stop contradicting yourself and understand this:
If he can't compare to Mr. Game & Watch and R.O.B., he wouldn't be treated as such.
So with that in mind, please stop calling him important because he's honestly anything but that.
Seriously, Golden. A cartoon character that was one of the first games Nintendo made is more important than a recurring Arcade character that was one of the first games Nintendo made? Sheriff is and unimportant part of Nintendo History?
So you say that being recurring doesn't matter for retro characters and you agree that Sheriff has only been in three games but you STILL call him recurring?
Stop. Contradicting. Yourself.
you wouldn't last a second against winston payne
Also, you've got some fan mail too Saturn!
Somebody who may or may not be related to a Deity named Robert said:
I never once said they were based on recency. You, however, made the point that he's often referenced in Nintendo history. I was merely debunking that. You were quite literally making the point that Sheriff was in Mr. Game & Watch's and R.O.B.'s league. Of the many reasons he's an important part of Nintendo history, you've named none aside from being Miyamoto's first character. I'd call you something along the lines of narcissistic or naive for simply assuming I don't know a thing about what I'm getting into, but oh, I guess that'd make me pissy, wouldn't it?
I'm not pissy for finding your support for a character to be unjustified for the reasons (or therefore lack of) you're giving, and I'm not getting any threads locked by doing just that, much to your dismay I'm sure. You haven't sold me on a character I disagree with and I'm exercising my right to poke at the flaws in your support, nothing sacrilegious to the thread like you imply. It's that simple.
(You should probably unblock him too, he's a nice guy if you get to know him.)