YoshiandToad
Smash Hero
Well if nothing else we can always hope he makes it in as an AT. The most overpowered Assist Trophy ever for that matter.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I agree with Metroid. Add Ridley in Smash 4 and Dark Samus as a late addition semi-clone and the whole series will be great for the rest of Smash.Metroid. Metroid for sure.
I really don't like the idea of Dark Samus. I don't see the appeal for that character.I agree with Metroid. Add Ridley in Smash 4 and Dark Samus as a late addition semi-clone and the whole series will be great for the rest of Smash.
Which franchises does everyone feel is underrepped?
You know what? I always forget Tingle. I would actually kind of like his inclusion because:My blood boils when people suggest Toon Zelda/Sheik being a better choice than either Tingle or Impa. And then when pressed on the matter, the 'Forbidden Seven' excuse gets used...
Being one of the cut seven does not mean they're important - it just means they're an easy add. Heck, Dr. Mario was in the Forbidden Seven, why don't I see him on even half as many rosters as I see Toon Zelda? Not only was every cut character in Brawl either a low-priority veteran or a clone (or both in some cases), but there was obviously a reason why Sakurai prioritized 39 other characters over them. Mewtwo aside, I don't see anything in the Melee cut characters that doesn't look exactly like an attempt by Sakurai to bulk out the roster of the game with cheap-and-cheerful last-minute additions (see: the Melee clones, Pichu, Young Link and Doc Mario especially).
So yeah... somebody please explain this Toon Zelda bs to me because I can't get my head around why people would either want or predict her inclusion.
F-Zero really doesn't need a new rep, but having stages for it is wonderful. I think F-Zero is getting enough love.Metroid. Even if you include Zero Suit I still think there's room for a biggun' if you'll pardon the pun.
I think given Kid Icarus's renaissance I think there's room for Pauletena as well but I think three is a stretch.
Donkey Kong should definitely have three and depending on roster size maybe four.
F-Zero may seem underepped but anyone other than Captain Falcon is controversial. F-zero still gets a lot of love in terms of stages though.
I agree with absolutely everything you just said.Metroid. Even if you include Zero Suit I still think there's room for a biggun' if you'll pardon the pun.
I think given Kid Icarus's renaissance I think there's room for Pauletena as well but I think three is a stretch.
Donkey Kong should definitely have three and depending on roster size maybe four.
F-Zero may seem underepped but anyone other than Captain Falcon is controversial. F-zero still gets a lot of love in terms of stages though.
Which franchises does everyone feel is underrepped?
To be honest, I'm relatively new to both, so from a non-bias perspective, K. Rool has to get in before even Ridley.
Cause DKC > Metroid, even if the butthurt fanbase disagrees.
It'll be our little secret~To be honest, I'm relatively new to both, so from a non-bias perspective, K. Rool has to get in before even Ridley.
...
Don't tell anyone at the Rildey thread I said this.
I think Metroid is pretty well represented in its own way.
3 Stages, 2 (movesets) "characters", PLENTY of music, an Assist Trophy, and 2 Bosses.
BUT, it could use another playable character for sure.
I feel Classic Nes games are underrepresented. Ice Climbers is great and all, but it hardly defined the NES era for people other than Sakurai. XD
The issue here is that at the end of the day, DK and Wario their evenings playing Tennis, Baseball, Extreme Soccer, Golf, Partying Hard, and Kart Racing with Mario. Demoting themselves down to Mario characters. The DK Crew (at least the ones Nintendo wanted to keep relevant) and K. Rool ended up joining DK for Baseball, so they became Mario characters too.K.Rool really is no Mario character. Neither is Donkey Kong really. He just so likes to appear in Mario games, and yeah, technically they're in the same universe. But only Yoshi's Island should really count as a Mario 'subseries' seeing as Mario is still heavily featured in Yoshi's Island's story. Mario is nowhere to be seen in DKC, or WarioLand / WarioWare. I'd argue that pre- WarioWare, Wario would definitely count as a Mario subseries. Seeing as Wario actually was created as an evil Mario, and in Mario's 'own' separate series from Donkey Kong.
See, the Mario series heavily evolved after Donkey Kong, the arcade game. Donkey Kong and Mario's histories are coming from the same root, but evolved heavily from that. Mario got it's own universe first, after that it was decided that Donkey Kong could use an universe of himself with Donkey Kong Country. To be calling both from the same series, even though DK doesn't appear in main Mario titles (Yoshi does) and even calling HIS OWN UNIVERSE'S MAIN VILLAIN a Mario character isn't right at all.
The pictures are pretty though on your roster. Disagree with Robin, Sheik, no Isaac and Shulk. Otherwise, perfect roster.
Uh, wouldn't destroy the point that makes Toon Zelda a likable and unique character comparison to the other Zeldas in the franchise? Toon Zelda is really just notable for her personality in Tetra. I would certainly expect Tetra before Toon Zelda, especially because Tetra despised her crew calling her Princess Zelda after the Windwaker incident in Phantom Hourglass (She herself is not fond of this new personality people are creating for her).Toon Zelda's all by herself.
Doesn't work for Toon Zelda or Zelda under any normal circumstance.
Would work. Better.
I don't think that she's necessary, but Sakurai is well known for throwing in (Semi) clones last minute. For example, Toon Link and Wolf.I really don't like the idea of Dark Samus. I don't see the appeal for that character.
It's pretty much JUST the Forbidden Seven. Which I stand by has some decent inclusions within it(I personally do want Roy back albeit 'luigified', Mewtwo's obviously loved and Dixie's heavily requested.) but I agree I'm not convinced on Toon Zelda being a vital addition, even if Tetra was a really cool character*.My blood boils when people suggest Toon Zelda/Sheik being a better choice than either Tingle or Impa. And then when pressed on the matter, the 'Forbidden Seven' excuse gets used...
Being one of the cut seven does not mean they're important - it just means they're an easy add. Heck, Dr. Mario was in the Forbidden Seven, why don't I see him on even half as many rosters as I see Toon Zelda? Not only was every cut character in Brawl either a low-priority veteran or a clone (or both in some cases), but there was obviously a reason why Sakurai prioritized 39 other characters over them. Mewtwo aside, I don't see anything in the Melee cut characters that doesn't look exactly like an attempt by Sakurai to bulk out the roster of the game with cheap-and-cheerful last-minute additions (see: the Melee clones, Pichu, Young Link and Doc Mario especially).
So yeah... somebody please explain this Toon Zelda bs to me because I can't get my head around why people would either want or predict her inclusion.
I don't think that she's necessary, but Sakurai is well known for throwing in (Semi) clones last minute. For example, Toon Link and Wolf.
Dark Samus would be a good idea for this.
Well that would be interesting.What if Dark Samus turns into Dark Zero Suit Samus. (Toon Sheik anyone?)
Or Dark Samus could turn into...
*WILD SHINHED-ECHI FLED*
To be honest, I'm relatively new to both, so from a non-bias perspective, K. Rool has to get in before even Ridley.
...
Don't tell anyone at the Rildey thread I said this.
Don't get me wrong, I still want Ridley in the game, and it is still very possible.Speaking up against Ridley is the greatest sin ever on this board apperantly.
However, I don't give a damn.
In that case, Mario, Yoshi and even LINK appeared in DKC2 first.The issue here is that at the end of the day, DK and Wario their evenings playing Tennis, Baseball, Extreme Soccer, Golf, Partying Hard, and Kart Racing with Mario. Demoting themselves down to Mario characters. The DK Crew (at least the ones Nintendo wanted to keep relevant) and K. Rool ended up joining DK for Baseball, so they became Mario characters too.
I was just suggesting that adding in a new character to Mario / DK / Wario / Yoshi is basically adding to the Mario section entirely.
Speaking of Impa, let me ruin the discussion with this picture.In that case, Mario, Yoshi and even LINK appeared in DKC2 first.
So now, I apperantly want THREE new Donkey Kong Country characters: King K.Rool, Dixie and Impa.
And no, Impa coupled with Zelda wouldn't make that much sence. But seeing as Impa IS Zelda's sworn guardian after all... It could work. It definitely makes more sence than coupling Zelda with Sheik at this point though.
Heh... man... even NES pixels look way better than Phillips CD-I.Speaking of Impa, let me ruin the discussion with this picture.
This Impa looks like she really could kick Ganondorf's ass. I second that if we have an Impa, we need this one.Heh... man... even NES pixels look way better than Phillips CD-I.
Here's the Impa of my choice, though.
Imagine her beating the heck out of Ganondorf. :D
I mainly think people are afraid that the end product of the game will be incomplete because they know people will buy characters so they will leave some out to get more money. Im gonna be honest, it is a scary thought.Wait, hang on a sec. People would seriously hate getting characters that were left out due to time constraints?
Yeah, okay.
Why not sure why this became an argument in the first place.In that case, Mario, Yoshi and even LINK appeared in DKC2 first.
So now, I apperantly want THREE new Donkey Kong Country characters: King K.Rool, Dixie and Impa.
And no, Impa coupled with Zelda wouldn't make that much sence. But seeing as Impa IS Zelda's sworn guardian after all... It could work. It definitely makes more sence than coupling Zelda with Sheik at this point though.
Shy Guy facepalm?
Shy guy, get out of the way. Yoshi's apparently been announced.
Both last appeared in a Zelda game in 2011, but Sheik is creatable in Scribblenauts, and is already a part of Smash Brothers. What reason is there to replace Sheik with Impa?And no, Impa coupled with Zelda wouldn't make that much sence. But seeing as Impa IS Zelda's sworn guardian after all... It could work. It definitely makes more sence than coupling Zelda with Sheik at this point though.
I understand it can be a scary thought. Companies like EA and Square have plagued their games with DLC, whether its doubling the price of the game to get extra maps announced before the game is even released (BF4) or making the consumer pay for the ending of the game (FF13-2)Wait, hang on a sec. People would seriously hate getting characters that were left out due to time constraints?
Yeah, okay.
Metroid and DKC are definitely under repped. I feel like they are going to get some new slots in some way. I personally think DKC could get 2 with Dixie and K Rool being about at the same point in popularity and support. I think K Rool should get in before Ridley so I agree with that. (Ridley should be in too)
I mainly think people are afraid that the end product of the game will be incomplete because they know people will buy characters so they will leave some out to get more money. Im gonna be honest, it is a scary thought.
The thing is that Nintendo hasnt really done DLC before. Theyve been hesitant to include it. If you look at companies like EA who literally double the price of their games for DLC, or Square for charging for the ending of FF 13-2, people have a right to be scared of DLC.
I really hope there is some though. Sakurai isnt focused on trying to make money, hes trying to create a good complete game. He may see the game as finished when hes done, or he might not, but I have a feeling that Nintendo will tread lightly in this department. I think they are aware of the damage that DLC can cause and how its probably one of the worst features of the last and tbis console generation. At least, I hope they know.
But who's to say they wont add characters with patch updates? (Its a long shot, but a man can dream)