Arcanir
An old friend evolved
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2013
- Messages
- 6,679
- Location
- Getting geared up for the 20th
- NNID
- Shoryu91
- 3DS FC
- 4253-4855-5860
Yeah it ranges between person to person and really that's the thing, one could never try on a fursuit and not give a crap about the more sexual side of it and the other one could do the opposite or anything in between. It's a varied group that you can't pin down except for one thing: they are fans of anthropomorphic characters and it's when you try to put more into that circle it becomes more complicated, especially if you try to include non-fanmade characters as furries themselves.I think the definition of "furry" is pretty easy to pin down. It's simply put someone who finds anthropomorphic animal characters sexually attractive.
At least, that's how I define it. I guess it ranges as simple as "a fan of anthro" to "dresses up in an animal suit and bangs it out with other people with similar interests". I don't think I'd say that you need to be making fan characters or even deal with fanart at all to qualify for the term.
But, let's be honest, most of the time here you're just gonna hear it as an insult towards people who like anthro.
Anyway! Moving on from that whole discussion, ha.
I do think that a Square character would really represent a substantial part of Nintendo's history. There are no traditional JRPG characters in Smash yet, but they have tons of potential for a solid Smash character.
And of course we can't forget the insults, god forbid you like Sonic or Star Fox nowadays...
OK! Sorry about that guys, I promise to end it off here. That's pretty much why I support Black Mage, Chocobo or the Mog, all three are more connected to Nintendo and their consoles and have appeared in more then a spare few games.