Responses in Red and write smaller please.
"Um, no? Just because 2 of his games were co-developed by Capcom doesn't mean they weren't made by Nintendo."
One was co-developed by Capcom, the other was completely made by Capcom. Nintendo made one on their own. Which was the joke.
"Last year he was the 2nd most wanted, and he was the 3rd most wanted character in 2011, when Sakurai was deciding the roster, so really, I should have put him at #3."
Sakurai wasn't deciding the roster then, he was working on Uprising, Vaati has never been that popular of a character so I don't even know what you're talking about. According to what? Did you ask all of your friends and Vaati got 3rd? 3rd and 2nd what? Or do you mean your 2nd and 3rd most wanted character?
"During Melee's time, Fire Emblem really didn't have a set mascot, and I believe at the time Anna was considered the closest to being it due to being in all the FE games."
No... it was always Marth because of FE1 and FE3. Anna has never been a main lord.
"Not sure what that has to do with anything."
Like I outright stated, recency DOES matter. Then I backed up why.
"Look at what happened to Vaati, he appeared not twice, but 3 times."
Nintendo didn't. Capcom put him in two games. Nintendo cast him aside as puppet villain.
Not only do I think this is unimportant, I also think importance means close to nothing.
So when you compare him to what are usually considered more important Zelda characters, you give good reasoning.
But then argue his importance over others, no. He's lucky he doesn't need importance, because I really don't think he has it.
"Even though it's probably not going to happen, due to Midna breaking the mirror."
That's a very uninspired, dull thought process. Just a little storyline could bring her back and make the ending still important. Besides, Zant had the ability of warping through realms. What happened to the triforce of power? What happened to the fused shadows? What happened to the Sol light in the Master Sword? If it was impossible because the mirror broke, then they wouldn't have ever considered it a possibility.
That'd be like me saying Vaati can't return because he was killed. Which would be dumb. Just a little story line and he's revived.
"Rumors should hold almost no argument, as most of them are fake."
You've counted the amount on both side? Regardless, when the amount reaches to a certain point that are all saying similar things, it becomes noticeable. And it does make sense, more so than anything else. What would make more sense than a Twilight Princess sequel for the Wii U? May I direct you back to the sales chart?
"Tech demo was a tech demo, and didn't even look like Twilight Princess, just another generic Zelda moment."
Believe it or not, that's what Twilight Princess's art style looks like on Wii hardware. Since it was ported over from the Gamecube, it's visuals didn't get better, there was no time for that. Didn't they even say the tech demo was the graphical successor to the artstyle in Twilight Princess? Or maybe somebody just told be that. Regardless, the proof is in Armogohma. Armogohma is the boss of TP's Temple of Time, and nothing else. Gohma has a very different appearance and is a different creature altogether.
"I need some sauce with that please."
I'm going to assume you want a source. If so, that's by far the oddest way I've seen one requested.
http://zelda.wikia.com/wiki/Midna
"...who knows? If we hear enough voices for her to come back, how can we not?"
"There is a growing fanbase dedicated to the return of Midna in a future game, known as Want Midna Back (WMB). This initiative has already launched several projects including a WMB CD, a mass email, made WMB shirts available for purchase over the internet, commissioned Midna figurines to be sent to
Nintendo, and even has an official website at
http://www.wantmidnaback.com ."
Seems like those voices exist, more here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midna
"You know the child timeline is where the huge gap is, right?"
Even though FSA's placement makes no sense, there isn't really a gap. I don't see how this could support anything. Compare the amount of people that want a TP or MM sequel to the amount that want a FSA sequel. Yep.
"It's pretty cartoony, like Vaati's games. He'd fit right in."
It's slightly more realistic than Skyward Sword. But there are like 100 characters in Dynasty Warriors games, so I don't doubt anybody can get in.
But it wouldn't be the first time Vaati had been overlooked and had obscure characters chosen over him.
"And you probably saw that I said it doesn't mean much."
You said that about reviews. Not sales, and yea it kind of matters. Why would Nintendo continue making games like these if they aren't doing worse than everything else they've tried?
"Vaati can't really be playable without Toon Link, it's like Bowser without Mario."
Eh. Not a fair comparison. The Toon Link in Smash Bros is technically from Wind Waker and Phantom Hourglass. Vaati isn't Toon Link's Bowser, that's a bit too far. But it doesn't really matter because it already happened and he already returned.
"Seeing how all the trophies were WW and TP, he couldn't be a trophy."
And Ocarina of Time, Phantom Hourglass, and Majora's Mask trophies.
I also found something hilarious. PIGS got a trophy before Vaati... PIGS! 3 Pigs from Wind Waker! XD
Why do you expect thing to be different this time around? That it won't just be TP, PH, ST, SS, WWHD, OoT3D, ALBW and possibly Zelda U trophies?