Louie G.
Smash Hero
Appearing any second can refer to his eventual reveal.
It could happen whenever.
It could happen whenever.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
*laughs*Oh come on.
That's the exact area in Other M where you fight Ridley.
Until we get an image where Kraid comes up from the lava, he was referring to goddamn Ridley, there's not question on that.
The real dilemma is if he is a stage hazard.
No Kamek.GUYS, I've got the perfect roster. Every plausible request is accounted for!
View attachment 5653
...I don't want to hear any complaints
Couldn't be Kraid because he wasn't in Other M. That isn't the point though. It is most likely Ridley, however that quote means absolutely nothing until it gets officially confirmed. That could mean so many things. Boss, stage hazard, Assist Trophy, Playable...literally anything. So to say that makes him disconfirmed is silly.Yeah, it must have been Kraid.
Except Ridley, an enemy from Samus's past that is on Pyro Sphere.
Except Toad was deconfirmed entirely so no it's actually not.
WHERES SHADOW AND GOKU?!?!?!?GUYS, I've got the perfect roster. Every plausible request is accounted for!
View attachment 5653
...I don't want to hear any complaints
So that IS the point.Couldn't be Kraid because he wasn't in Other M. That isn't the point though. It is most likely Ridley,
Who said he was deconfirmed?So to say that makes him disconfirmed is silly.
So it could mean Timmy Turner is an Assist Trophy?it could mean anything..
Well you yourself said that Ridley fans are like the Toad supporters. Toad is all but disconfirmed at this point as far as I'm concerned.So that IS the point.
Who said he was deconfirmed?
So because I compared the stubbornness of the Ridley fans that dismiss all evidence suggesting he may be a stage hazard to the stubbornness of Toad supporters, that technically means I said Ridley fans support Toad.Well you yourself said that Ridley fans are like the Toad supporters. Toad is all but disconfirmed at this point as far as I'm concerned.
It could, but he was likely referring to a stage hazard. Like REALLY likely.That quote was rather vague though. It could simply be a reference. It could mean stage hazard. It could mean a playable character. It could even mean Ridley as an assist character.
Nope. Not what I said at all.So because I compared the stubbornness of the Ridley fans that dismiss all evidence suggesting he may be a stage hazard to the stubbornness of Toad supporters, that technically means I said Ridley fans support Toad.
Most people who supported Nintendog considered him disconfirmed after it was shown as an Assist Trophy again actually.I consider Ridley basically confirmed as a stage hazard at this point.
Seriously, if you all liked Nintendog as much as Ridley, everyone would be insisting the french bulldog trophy didn't disconfirm labrador retriever and bashing naysayers.
Thank You!The difference is that Toad was shown in broad daylight as a meat shield yet again, while people being idiots denied it. While Ridley has not been shown in anyway shape or form, literally the only thing being a very vague comment that is suggested to be a translation mistake anyway. That's not even mentioning it's been literally months and this supposed "stage hazard" hasn't been shown, when there wasn't any hesitance with doing the same for Yellow Devil or the Emperor.
Basically, it's reveal vs. no reveal.
Why is that likely? Or better yet, what evidence do you have to prove it's likely over all of the other possibilities at the moment? Besides the role Ridley plays in Other M in that location, there's NOTHING that shows a definitive direction Ridley will be taken.It could, but he was likely referring to a stage hazard. Like REALLY likely.
Next we'll talk about Fire Emblem and Impa. Little do we know, Nintendo is making Impa Emblem in 2015. So we'll get a certain someone in Smash 5.So we're going into the new year...
Arguing about Ridley.
Some things never change, am I right?
When you say, "people being idiots" do you mean to say it like, "people being idiots" that the people were being idiots at that particular instance, or "people, being idiots" as if to imply that people are generally idiotic?The difference is that Toad was shown in broad daylight as a meat shield yet again, while people being idiots denied it.
I'm so hyped for Impa Emblem. It's got me morre hyped than StarPokemon and MeToad: Other T.Next we'll talk about Fire Emblem and Impa. Little do we know, Nintendo is making Impa Emblem in 2015. So we'll get a certain someone in Smash 5.
You are in fact implying that because I compared the LEVEL of stubbornness to Toad Supporters that I am in fact comparing what they supported and not how ridiculously they convince their selves that whatever they supported might not be happening.Nope. Not what I said at all.
Nope. Not what I said at all.It means that Ridley supporters do the same as Toad supporters as they continue to say he has a chance even though it's at the point where Toad is basically disconfirmed.
You don't seem to know the difference between definitive and likely as you clearly talk like it's the same thing. It's likely because when Sakurai showed off the stage, his first comment was that an enemy from Samus's past (none other than Ridley) will appear at any moment. So it's likely that because he made that comment on the STAGE, he was implying Ridley might appear in the stage at any moment when you play it.Why is that likely? Or better yet, what evidence do you have to prove it's likely over all of the other possibilities at the moment? Besides the role Ridley plays in Other M in that location, there's NOTHING that shows a definitive direction Ridley will be taken.
People being extremely naive to what is presented in front of them as not being legitimate and still trying to be incredibly persistent over something that is already confirmed for not playable.When you say, "people being idiots" do you mean to say it like, "people being idiots" that the people were being idiots at that particular instance, or "people, being idiots" as if to imply that people are generally idiotic?
I can't wait for the world premier of Ridley and K. Rool's Excellent Adventure.I'm so hyped for Impa Emblem. It's got me morre hyped than StarPokemon and MeToad: Other T.
So you live in a different year!?Happy New Year for my timezone.
Timezones make it so some people are still in 2013, I wonder if anyone in the thread is.So you live in a different year!?
View attachment 5659
Where's Amaterasu? Did you seriously leave him out?happy new year everyone ^_^
I wish you all a glorious new year =3
and to celebrate this moment I will post the very first roster of 2014, enjoy
View attachment 5657
not biased at all eh