Seraphim.
Smash Ace
inb4 Robin gets in over Roy and Chrom
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
first point, awakening is not being overlooked:I like Roy, but honestly, I still don't see the grounds where he gets in over Chrom in SSB4.
Maybe Roy is a more popular character. Maybe he would be more unique. But I don't think that accounts for everything. I think it is just as important to think of the games themselves.
I mean, what about Brawl? Sure, Ike was popular and all, and I don't know about you, but I heard a lot more fans asking for Lyn than for Ike. She might have been more popular. She might have even been more unique (though I'm not taking anything away from Ike in that regard. Dude's awesome).
What about Lucas' inclusion? Yes, he himself is a generally well-liked character, but doesn't his inclusion have SOMETHING to do with the release of MOTHER 3 as well?
Even if Roy IS a more popular character (which I'm still not convinced of), Fire Emblem Awakening was a huge game. Even if you want to say "it can be represented just as well through stages/ATs," even if you want to call this a "recency argument," I seriously doubt Awakening will be overlooked, ESPECIALLY in the face of a character who has not had a major role since before Brawl.
If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, and Roy's fine. I just don't see how he is anywhere NEAR the obvious choice.
ur putting a troll face but u do have a point.People say Roy is more recognizable than Chrom because he was in a Smash Bros. game. Well then put Chrom is this installment of Smash Bros. and he'll be more recognizable than Roy.![]()
Yeah. Marth and Ike make the most sense. With the "overlooked" thing, I mainly meant from a playable character standpoint, since I already mentioned stages. It'd be like having New Pork City, but no Lucas.first point, awakening is not being overlooked:
there is a stage already representing fire emblem awakening (fernix arena, I believe is what its being called) while I'm not saying that this will be the only representation from awakening, they are defiantly not overlooking it,
second point, I don't believe that Roy is the more obvious character, I mean a week ago, everybody thought Chrom was, everybody is just taking sides like usual, imagine it something like k. rool vs Dixie, but on a smaller scale,
personally like I said before, all I want is ike to return, I couldn't care which of these two get in, but I felt like correcting a few of your points![]()
Are we representing Fire Emblem titles or characters? Ike was pretty much suggested to Sakurai for being highly requested. Before that Sakurai wasn't sure who to add.Maybe Roy is a more popular character. Maybe he would be more unique. But I don't think that accounts for everything. I think it is just as important to think of the games themselves.
Lyn wasn't competing with someone who had an amount of importance that rivaled her.I mean, what about Brawl? Sure, Ike was popular and all, and I don't know about you, but I heard a lot more fans asking for Lyn than for Ike.
Doesn't Mario's appearance have SOMETHING to do with the Super Mario series?What about Lucas' inclusion? Yes, he himself is a generally well-liked character, but doesn't his inclusion have SOMETHING to do with the release of MOTHER 3 as well?
It's true. He is. It's not too ambiguous.Even if Roy IS a more popular character (which I'm still not convinced of)
Ike hasn't had a major role since Brawl. Let's replace him with Chrom and get rid of Captain Falcon too. Which is it? The Fire Emblem character whi's GAME had more sales, or the Fire Emblem character who has more requests and is more memorable. It's hard to believe that Sakurai would consider Chrom, a fairly generic character, when he didn't even plan to have Ike until IS suggested him due to requests, something Roy has the upper hand in against a character with just as much importance in the Fire Emblem series.Fire Emblem Awakening was a huge game. Even if you want to say "it can be represented just as well through stages/ATs," even if you want to call this a "recency argument," I seriously doubt Awakening will be overlooked, ESPECIALLY in the face of a character who has not had a major role since before Brawl.
I detect some bias here. If not, just a not very bright statement.If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, and Roy's fine. I just don't see how he is anywhere NEAR the obvious choice.
Queen Q. DixieDixie Kool For Smash!
I'm not sure if their were alot more fans of Lyn than Ike, I do know however that they were alot louder than the Ike supporters though, being even louder than the Anti-Ridleyians we have now. But Ike was one of the top choices though.I like Roy, but honestly, I still don't see the grounds where he gets in over Chrom in SSB4.
Maybe Roy is a more popular character. Maybe he would be more unique. But I don't think that accounts for everything. I think it is just as important to think of the games themselves.
I mean, what about Brawl? Sure, Ike was popular and all, and I don't know about you, but I heard a lot more fans asking for Lyn than for Ike. She might have been more popular. She might have even been more unique (though I'm not taking anything away from Ike in that regard. Dude's awesome).
What about Lucas' inclusion? Yes, he himself is a generally well-liked character, but doesn't his inclusion have SOMETHING to do with the release of MOTHER 3 as well?
Even if Roy IS a more popular character (which I'm still not convinced of), Fire Emblem Awakening was a huge game. Even if you want to say "it can be represented just as well through stages/ATs," even if you want to call this a "recency argument," I seriously doubt Awakening will be overlooked, ESPECIALLY in the face of a character who has not had a major role since before Brawl.
If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, and Roy's fine. I just don't see how he is anywhere NEAR the obvious choice.
I don't believe anyone claimed they were overlooking it. But, I don't see how this is anymore supportive of Chrom than Skyloft is of Giriham.
Doesn't seem any weirder than Ness appearing in New Pork City instead of Onnet in Classic Mode or about as weird as having Great Bay with no Skull Kid.It'd be like having New Pork City, but no Lucas.
well considering that Smash played a big role in Roys game, the series itself really, receiving international release, i'd say that's a strong basis for Smash' influence on Roys popularity.Before I start, you can't claim Roy is more recognizable than Chrom just because of a Smash game. There is really no strong enough basis to say that alone is what made him more iconic and that the actual game wouldn't have had or didn't have anything to do with it.
It had a strong influence on him. My point is that you can't claim there would be no superior influence to Chrom without Melee.well considering that Smash played a big role in Roys game, the series itself really, ever received international release, i'd say that's a strong basis for Smash' influence on Roys popularity.
those Zelda examples don't work as they still have a character in Smash to represent those games. u know he's got green clothes, pointed ears, regularly appears left handed with one exception.I don't believe anyone claimed they were overlooking it. But, I don't see how this is anymore supportive of Chrom than Skyloft is of Giriham.
Doesn't seem any weirder than Ness appearing in New Pork City instead of Onnet in Classic Mode or about as weird as having Great Bay with no Skull Kid.
The reasons you give me as to why this supports Chrom and not other characters seem oddly specific.those Zelda examples don't work as they still have a character in Smash to represent those games. u know he's got green clothes, pointed ears, regularly appears left handed with one exception.
More options, in my opinion. For example, two different alternating playstyles (ie, switching between the Falchion and Spear for different attacks) allows for more variety in his moveset, while Roy only has his Sword of Seals to work with. You still need to swing the sword to make the fire. Chrom, however, has the advantage of having more obvious things to pull from, due to possessing two weapons with different styles of play.Explain what more he has/can have that makes him ore his potential superior to what Roy has/can have?
I highly doubt it. Take Hector, for example. Often cited as an amazing Fire Emblem character, but gets little to no Smash requests, as it would be a fruitless effort. Why would they add him years later, when his popularity waned? With Roy, he still has the popularity because he made it in when the moment was right for him. If Chrom were to get in, it would be the same deal.Well who wields the "iconic" stamp? First of all why does it matter what made Roy iconic? And how do you know he was iconic or would only be iconic because of his appearance in Melee? Even without Melee it's likely he still would have had more requests and popularity.
I never remember Sakurai saying that Fire Emblem had different criteria. Pokemon, yes, but not Fire Emblem.You're comparing Fire Emblem criteria to Donkey Kong criteria. Different franchises like Pokemon and Fire Emblem have different criteria.
What I'm saying is that it's a fruitless comparison. Roy has had more time to gain that love, while Chrom has had less than a year or so (well, about a year and a few months in Japan, if we're getting technical, haha).I don't think it's opinion that more people like Roy than Chrom. Like saying it's opinion that more people like Pikachu than Klefki
And while this is true, it still doesn't explain why you seem to write off Chrom as not being unique, while he has just as much, if not more, to work with than Roy does.Both characters fit Clone criteria. However, Roy has Fire (which actually has it's own affect in some attacks) and can use his fire to have his own attacks. You can argue that Chrom has a lance and wields his sword differently, just like you can argue Roy has fire and can wield his sword differently.
But what I'm saying is that being recurring doesn't really matter. It was never a revealed criteria that Sakurai uses. And in an RPG series like Fire Emblem that has a fluid cast, it really doesn't matter too much.Appearing in something as appose to not appearing in something still makes you more recurring. DLC still counts as an "appearance". It doesn't really matter how much significance it has, it's still an extra appearance as apposed to not an extra appearance.
Once again, you contradict yourself. Above, you say,Good thing Roy has more popularity and more potential to be unique. So again, Roy has the upper hand.
Implying both can easily be made unique, which I agree with. But then you flip right back to the "Roy has more potential to be unique," which in my opinion, is baseless, when Chrom has yet to appear in Smash, and when Roy did, he was a clone.Both characters fit Clone criteria. However, Roy has Fire (which actually has it's own affect in some attacks) and can use his fire to have his own attacks. You can argue that Chrom has a lance and wields his sword differently, just like you can argue Roy has fire and can wield his sword differently.
I think you missed my point. What I'm saying is, Roy would have likely become another Hector, Lyn or Sigurd if he had not been in Melee. People would have stopped requesting him for Smash, as they'd know that his time has passed, as cool as he was, and would become more of a pipe dream than a realistic idea. But being a Smash veteran made him stick out more as an important character in the series, and give him a popularity boost. What I'm saying is that this could easily happen to Chrom, as well, separating him from the "other Fire Emblem characters."Yes. And Fire Emblem fans have plenty of reason to. And even if it was just because of Melee, it still makes him more remembered. Why does it matter WHAT made him more remembered?
In this case, it's a decision beyond our control, and more toward Sakurai's. Personally, I think he'd go for whichever offers a fun and unique playstyle, which I personally see Chrom providing easier than I see Roy providing. Both could be fun, definitely. I just think that Chrom can offer more, as he can be an archetype that Smash hasn't had yet, and that is a stance-switching character (note, this isn't the same as a transformation. These are faster, and in general change how certain moves work [fitting, as Fire Emblem has you select your units and weapons to fit the situation], as opposed to creating a whole second moveset), switching from being durable and forceful, to being lighter and having more reach, at the expense of some power.I guess so. But, even without Smash Roy has just as much importance. It's "any other Fire Emblem character" VS "any other Fire Emblem character". How do we choose?
I think I explained what I was getting at better in the above explanations.But, he's not. So I don't see how that's relevant.
No problem!Thanks, dude![]()
Both, I think. Why would we care about characters if we didn't care about games?Are we representing Fire Emblem titles or characters? Ike was pretty much suggested to Sakurai for being highly requested. Before that Sakurai wasn't sure who to add.
Both Chrom and Roy are lords, I see no reason that is any less of a rival.Lyn wasn't competing with someone who had an amount of importance that rivaled her.
Exactly.Doesn't Mario's appearance have SOMETHING to do with the Super Mario series?
This statement confuses me:Ike hasn't had a major role since Brawl. Let's replace him with Chrom and get rid of Captain Falcon too. Which is it? The Fire Emblem character whi's GAME had more sales, or the Fire Emblem character who has more requests and is more memorable. It's hard to believe that Sakurai would consider Chrom, a fairly generic character, when he didn't even plan to have Ike until IS suggested him due to requests, something Roy has the upper hand in against a character with just as much importance in the Fire Emblem series.
If there's any bias, it's that I think Awakening was a much bigger game, and I think that does amount to more right now than a reintroduction of Roy. That's an easily arguable opinion.I detect some bias here. If not, just a not very bright statement.
Link is playable.Doesn't seem any weirder than Ness appearing in New Pork City instead of Onnet in Classic Mode or about as weird as having Great Bay with no Skull Kid.
im not advocating Chrom here. im just saying ur example was poor as those levels are represented by a character who appears in that game. a better one would be something like say how Brawl had an Animal Crossing stage but no characters. see what im getting at?The reasons you give me as to why this supports Chrom and not other characters seem oddly specific.
And Sakurai would likely recognize this as much as he recognized the other PSI powers from the MOTHER series.More options, in my opinion. For example, two different alternating playstyles (ie, switching between the Falchion and Spear for different attacks) allows for more variety in his moveset, while Roy only has his Sword of Seals to work with. You still need to swing the sword to make the fire. Chrom, however, has the advantage of having more obvious things to pull from, due to possessing two weapons with different styles of play.
We're comparing Hector who has little to no requests, to Roy has many requests. Is this your defense to Roy not having popularity if not for Melee, because his mom (Lyn) objects to that.I highly doubt it. Take Hector, for example. Often cited as an amazing Fire Emblem character, but gets little to no Smash requests, as it would be a fruitless effort. Why would they add him years later, when his popularity waned? With Roy, he still has the popularity because he made it in when the moment was right for him. If Chrom were to get in, it would be the same deal.
Characters added only for more requests and being more unique? I recall other franchises having more criteria outside of that.I never remember Sakurai saying that Fire Emblem had different criteria. Pokemon, yes, but not Fire Emblem.
Well, why is this not a fair comparison. That's the point I'm making. Roy has gained more love. I mean you can't really ask me to not point out that Bowser Jr is more likely and gained more love than Baby Bowser because it's fruitless comparison..What I'm saying is that it's a fruitless comparison. Roy has had more time to gain that love, while Chrom has had less than a year or so (well, about a year and a few months in Japan, if we're getting technical, haha).
You sicko...and while that last part is true, I wish it were opposite. Klefki's awesome. One of my favorites.![]()
Saying he has more to work with than Roy is debatable. You can do just as much with Fire as you can with a shard on a stick. Chrom not neing unique is simply my opinion.And while this is true, it still doesn't explain why you seem to write off Chrom as not being unique, while he has just as much, if not more, to work with than Roy does.
If I said both can be unique than why can't I say that one would simply be MORE unique? And you saying Roy will be a clone when he has yet to appear in Smash 4 is just the same as me saying Chrom will when looking from their games after their release they have just as much to work from and neither have appeared in Smash 4 yet. I say Chrom likely wouldn't be unique based off the patterns of Sakurai's "Clone criteria" which is usually cloning characters with extreme similarities. In which case he might not even consider Chrom's lance like you and I would.Implying both can easily be made unique, which I agree with. But then you flip right back to the "Roy has more potential to be unique," which in my opinion, is baseless, when Chrom has yet to appear in Smash, and when Roy did, he was a clone.
Lyn is a bad example there, she had more requests than Ike. And Chrom will likely become another one of these too.I think you missed my point. What I'm saying is, Roy would have likely become another Hector, Lyn or Sigurd
Prove this. Again, Lyn was more requested than Ike.if he had not been in Melee. People would have stopped requesting him for Smash
I'm gonna go ahead and say that's bull crap. And besides, doesn't this excuse work for Ike as well? Why are we even talking in hypothetical? Roy had the Melee appearance. I'm really not interested in pretending what it would be like if he didn't as it's irrelevant to this conversationas they'd know that his time has passed, as cool as he was, and would become more of a pipe dream than a realistic idea
It could, but we shouldn't add Chrom because we assume he MIGHT become popular. Adding him to make him popular seems like recency/commercialism and it works as well to support ANY Fire Emblem character in the entire series.[/quote]But being a Smash veteran made him stick out more as an important character in the series, and give him a popularity boost. What I'm saying is that this could easily happen to Chrom, as well, separating him from the "other Fire Emblem characters."
If only Habanero were here to make this Fire Emblem argument more entertaining.
Fix'd.[/quote]We're comparing Hector who has little to no requests, to Roy has many requests. Is this your defense to Roy not having popularity if not for Melee, because his mom (Ninian) objects to that.
Can't, too busy eating black hearts in Sonic: Lost World.If only Habanero were here to make this Fire Emblem argument more entertaining.
Isn't that exactly what Sakurai did with Roy?It could, but we shouldn't add Chrom because we assume he MIGHT become popular. Adding him to make him popular seems like recency/commercialism and it works as well to support ANY Fire Emblem character in the entire series.
Roy was added because of his uniqueness as apposed to Leif. So no he was not added for commercialism. My logic is not backwards. It's completely in order.Isn't that exactly what Sakurai did with Roy?
I mean his game wasn't even released at the time for crying out loud.
Saturn, I agree on your stance but some of your logic is a bit backwards.
Not sure if judgement is the most iconic summon, i was thinking maybe in eclipse (basically the same) or atlanta (rain of light arrows)? those three would be excellent anyways.JUDGEMENT!!!
A clone isn't unique, sakurai wanted a clone at that time and he choose roy cause teh ph1re. it was a promotional thing dude.Roy was added because of his uniqueness as apposed to Leif. So no he was not added for commercialism. My logic is not backwards. It's completely in order.
Why would Sakurai add a character in his own game for the sole reason of advertising something that isn't his own franchise with a character who's existence hasn't even yet been made aware?
Chrom wouldn't be added for commercialism either.Roy was added because of his uniqueness as apposed to Leif. So no he was not added for commercialism. My logic is not backwards. It's completely in order.
Chrom's existence hasn't been made aware?Why would Sakurai add a character in his own game for the sole reason of advertising something that isn't his own franchise with a character who's existence hasn't even yet been made aware?
Yes Roy was added because Sakurai felt his ability to use fire would make him a good Marth clone, but he was also added to advertise FE6. however since Sakurai tried to bring Roy into Brawl he must see him more as an advertisement. I wouldn't be surprised if he has thought about adding Roy in Smash 4 since he seems to be trying to bring back Mewtwo as well.Roy was added because of his uniqueness as apposed to Leif. So no he was not added for commercialism. My logic is not backwards. It's completely in order.
Why would Sakurai add a character in his own game for the sole reason of advertising something that isn't his own franchise with a character who's existence hasn't even yet been made aware?
I never said anyone claimed that they were overlooking it, nor did I say it was in support of Chrom, I just said that that Nintendo is not overlooking fire emblem awakening.I don't believe anyone claimed they were overlooking it. But, I don't see how this is anymore supportive of Chrom than Skyloft is of Giriham.
pretty sure he was referring to Roy there in past tense.Chrom's existence hasn't been made aware?
What?
I wish everyone would listen to this post now, please
but I like honcrisp applesIt would seem the peaceful days of tending my garden will have to wait while I take care of these matters the rest of you cannot.
At this point it's a rather pointless debate because neither character are going to provide much, It's rather asinine that people are going out of their way to have these silly debates that is overall going to lead to the same scenario. A character is simply there and provides little to a franchise that should provide a lot more. It's like trying to pick between a honeycrisp apple and gala apple, who the **** cares it's still a bloody apple regardless. Don't know why one would magically be better then the other if they are going to be on par with each other either way. What, because one has fire? Please.
I'd like to see an apple on fire...It would seem the peaceful days of tending my garden will have to wait while I take care of these matters the rest of you cannot.
At this point it's a rather pointless debate because neither character are going to provide much, It's rather asinine that people are going out of their way to have these silly debates that is overall going to lead to the same scenario. A character is simply there and provides little to a franchise that should provide a lot more. It's like trying to pick between a honeycrisp apple and gala apple, who the **** cares it's still a bloody apple regardless. Don't know why one would magically be better then the other if they are going to be on par with each other either way. What, because one has fire? Please.