Have you ever asked anybody that?
I've been asking many people if they would rather have "Alternate versions of playable characters be playable" or "Completely new characters with the alternate versions of existing characters being alternate costumes".
Everybody I asked preferred having completely new characters. Whether we actually got the costumes or not.
I have asked many people if they wanted characters like Pichu, Dr. Mario, and Toon Zelda actually playable and they said yes. And again we have already been given these completely new characters on the original roster so nobody is going to care if the DLC is just alternates. DLC should be for extras. There are people who actually want those characters playable even before original ones, so don't act like they don't exist. How many original characters do you need before deserving alternates get a chance? Sometimes Sakurai adds characters he feels necessary in particular circumstances. It's not all about fan requests. You're saying nobody would buy DLC if it was just alternate forms of characters which is pure bull****. Tons of people would buy it because it's not only more characters, but people they like. You are suggesting that nobody would buy it because nobody wants to play as Pichu, Dr. Mario, or Toon Zelda. Well guess what they do. And it would take less time than making original characters that wouldn't really fit as DLC and actually have a chance in the original roster of this game or the next unlike alternate forms of characters that deserve playability, but wouldn't normally have priority.
You're making many claims without any evidence. Smash's user base is far beyond Smashboards, so don't use it as your only source.
Then why are YOU making claims with no evidence and using SmashBoards as your only source???
Mega Man X can't be a costume for Zero, but that still worked out in Marvel vs Capcom because they have the same build. So Pichu would still be an easy costume to make.
Lol, what? You said it worked because they have the same build. Pichu & Pikachu do NOT have the same build and that's why it doesn't work as a costume. You're honestly trying to say that if we gave Pikachu clothing or a pallete swap that he's look remotely like Pichu when he doesn't have the head, ears, size, or body. Yeah, that sounds easy to make.
Not Toon Zelda on the other hand, but I never SAID Toon Zelda should be an alternate costume. So I fail to see your point there.
You said alternate forms should be alternate costumes in general.
What makes that any different?
Characters would still need to go through the exact same criteria.
Not for DLC they wouldn't. DLC is for extras not characters that were important enough to get into the original.
It's not like characters are now suddenly plausible because it would be going DLC
It's exactly like that. DLC would be for extras so it would be plausible.
it still goes into the main game.
Not entirely. They wouldn't affect the main game as much as the already programmed characters because they haven't been programmed into it. Say you have 5 Pokemon and you added a 6th, that would be unplausible in the main game, but since it's simply an extra that doesn't go through all the same stuff as an original it is plausible.
Down-B is a sinner and needs to be removed too. I mean, not only is it quite ridiculous as is, but it's called Wizard's Foot, even the name sucks.
Seriously?