Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I'm not sure you and I go to the same church. But back on topic, ZS should totally have a nuclear vomit attack!Don't forget the 16th Commandment: "Though Raccoon must wield a gun and Captain America's shield, and maybe also Iron Man's helmet. Amen. Praise Tom Cruise's anus in Mission Impossible 4. Ahshala."
That's pretty unlikely to happen, and would make no sense as Tom Nook deserves to be his own character.I'mma be petitioning for a Tom Nook costume for the Villager yo.
no cause theres still WAY better options imo.So if the popular choices like K. Rool, Ridley, and Palutena get announced, would you accept Tom Nook?
um . . . . . . . could you be more specific?
That would not at all affect his chances, or my prediction of him. The only way a character's chances can be revealed is if, say, Sheik is announced before Zelda, ZSS before Samus, or a Yoshi/Wario rep before Yoshi/Wario.So if the popular choices like K. Rool, Ridley, and Palutena get announced, would you accept Tom Nook?
It makes way more sense the concept of a second Animal Crossing character, believe it or not. It's no crazier than Dr. Mario if not less crazy where as the concept BluePikmin11 is trying to sell us is crazier than 'Mr. Game & Watch 2'Ninten...out-prioritizing Tom Nook....
Did you honest to god just set the 'more priority' list I gave you on fire and throw it in the trash. Please explain to me why you blatantly ignore the proof and evidence and proceed to act like it doesn't exist. This is what causes your insane rosters.So if the popular choices like K. Rool, Ridley, and Palutena get announced, would you accept Tom Nook?
*LogicalWhatever, if you don't care about your rosters and sounding the least bit logiccal, why should I?
To be honest, I'd rather have Tom Nook over Pale Tuna.So if the popular choices like K. Rool, Ridley, and Palutena get announced, would you accept Tom Nook?
That's pretty unlikely to happen, and would make no sense as Tom Nook deserves to be his own character.
It was just a hypothetical question.Did you honest to god just set the 'more priority' list I gave you on fire and throw it in the trash. Please explain to me why you blatantly ignore the proof and evidence and proceed to act like it doesn't exist. This is what causes your insane rosters.
Because when people don't agree or declare him the victor, he resorts to cussing before finally hiding behind the ignore button and pretending you don't exist. Golden doesn't really accept different opinions. It's pointless to debate with him because he just puts you on ignore.I'm most interested in a debate between GoldenYuiitusin and SaturnGamer64. I never seen these two in conflict.
Well, making yourself believe something you want doesn't make it true. It's called denial.Also, because I treat every Nintendo franchise as equal to having playable characters.
At least not ever since Golden out him on ignore :/I'm most interested in a debate between GoldenYuiitusin and SaturnGamer64. I never seen these two in conflict.
says all rosters that don't agree with him are not logical,Whatever, if you don't care about your rosters and sounding the least bit logiccal, why should I?
Poor naive Saturn, do you really think it's that easy?I've spent maybe 5 minutes on this thread today...
Naw, it ain't witchcraft, it's just honesty (and boomerang fish.)
A Zero Suit Samus puke vomit nuclear attack would be a heck of a lot better than just putting her clothes back on!!!I'm not sure you and I go to the same church. But back on topic, ZS should totally have a nuclear vomit attack!
It's pretty obvious that if neither get in, people will be disappointed.For some reason all the people here thinks that K.Rool and Ridley are 100% safe.
At least for me, they are iffy.
I don't know what's going to happen with this forum if they are deconfirmed ._.
There will be an outrage, an uprise will happen most likelyFor some reason all the people here thinks that K.Rool and Ridley are 100% safe.
At least for me, they are iffy.
I don't know what's going to happen with this forum if they are deconfirmed ._.
they are iffy,For some reason all the people here thinks that K.Rool and Ridley are 100% safe.
At least for me, they are iffy.
I don't know what's going to happen with this forum if they are deconfirmed ._.
While the likelihood of a second AC character may or may not be likely, you're exaggerating Tom Nook's unimportance. If there was a second AC character, Nook would probably be the most likely choice, as he's one of the most recognizable characters after "the villager".It makes way more sense the concept of a second Animal Crossing character, believe it or not. It's no crazier than Dr. Mario if not less crazy where as the concept BluePikmin11 is trying to sell us is crazier than 'Mr. Game & Watch 2'
Aw, you've spent an hour or so more on this thread before. I know you can handle more than this.I've spent maybe 5 minutes on this thread today...
The pan is the fact that both are deconfirmed. We are the car. This is the result:For some reason all the people here thinks that K.Rool and Ridley are 100% safe.
At least for me, they are iffy.
I don't know what's going to happen with this forum if they are deconfirmed ._.
More sense than Tom Nook. That was the point, that Tom Nook is more pointless even in comparison to Ninten. (although if Ninten didn't wear a hat this would be a different discussion.)says all rosters that don't agree with him are not logical,
says ninten is more important than tom nook,
yes because your ideas make the most sense, don't they
Naw it's cool. Everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion....Naw, it ain't witchcraft, it's just honesty (and boomerang fish.)
I'd rather have a lot of characters instead of Pale Tuna, because quite frankly, her potential just doesn't spark my imagination, and from what I gather, most people only want her because they like Kid Icarus: Uprising, they want another Kid Icarus character, they like her character instead of/without thinking about her potential as a smash bros playable character, or because they feel Smash needs more side boob.To be honest, I'd rather have Tom Nook over Pale Tuna.
Pale Tuna could be great, but I'd rather have Swordfish, thank you very much.To be honest, I'd rather have Tom Nook over Pale Tuna.
That's probably the last problem you should consider when thinking of Ninten. I was thinking more along the lines that MOTHER 2 being so similar to MOTHER 1 is what makes his representation pointless. Him being obscure doesn't really matter in the case of completing the trio and adding the first protagonist of MOTHER. He's probably not that obscure in Japan, especially after the GBA port.Ninten may be the first Mother hero, but he's pretty obscure now, and not in the "retro" kind of way.
um . . . . . . . could you be more specific?
No character will truly ever be a shoo-in (it's shoo-in people...).For some reason all the people here thinks that K.Rool and Ridley are 100% safe.
At least for me, they are iffy.
I don't know what's going to happen with this forum if they are deconfirmed ._.
I would prefer Halibut anyways. It's got so much more potential. You can roast it, deep fry it, or put cheese on it and it still tastes amazing.Well Pale Tuna is a fish, so it's understandable why people would be skeptical.