Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I'm almost certain those aren't the same groups of people.It really baffles me that people can be clamoring for Breath of the Wild Link but be so against the idea of Paper Mario being in the game.
Well... with BotW Link the trailer invites to speculate...It really baffles me that people can be clamoring for Breath of the Wild Link but be so against the idea of Paper Mario being in the game.
Forgive me for not understanding but how does this all not also benefit Toad as much as Daisy?If you look at the selected costumes in Miitopia, you would realise that it only consists of characters Nintendo think are important to their series. There are only 4 Animal Crossing characters picked alongside the sixteen possible ones. Splatoon was a massive hit for Nintendo so they were included. Ness was from a cult classic game. Daisy was included over Wario, Diddy Kong and Waluigi in that game, even though a Wario/Waluigi costume would be much much easier to do. This game was developed in the time when Smash Bros. planning might have been done.
They also shipped more Daisy, Boo and Rosalina amiibo than the other amiibo in Japan - these were the only three amiibo that were added to the badge arcade after Mario, Luigi, Peach, Yoshi, Toad and Bowser.
The fact that Namco went back and added her to a very old game that did not get updated for a long time, and did not make her a clone in that game or their sports projects makes me hopeful.
Oh, and I absoultely think that Waluigi has real fans.
Protip: Attempting to tear down other characters doesn't make Daisy any more likely. It only continues to enforce the increasingly common viewpoint that Daisy fans are memoryman-level insane. If that's a viewpoint you think is unfair, I'd suggest not doing things that'd further perpetuate it. This day is about Daisy, not Dixie.And this is what I say when people let their bias taint their visions. No, Daisy is NOT a Mario Kart palette swap. She has different animations too in Mario Kart and in other games she plays very differently. In Mario Sports she is more powerful but less graceful in control than Peach. She can manipulate flowers to her advantage to blind and stop her opponents or to give her a boost throughout various Mario Party and Sports games. As for Toad, he has been left out of a few games, whilst Daisy was playable, because of his lack of ability to really do anything. Captain Toad cannot even jump.
If Dixie Kong was a more prominent character than Daisy is, then why could she not even get in Mario Maker, or even in many Donkey Kong themed places while Diddy Kong was recognised as both a Mario and Donkey Kong character? She has been forgotten in pretty much everything Nintendo related in the oast few years besides Tropical Freeze but Donkey Kong and Diddy Kong still keep appearing in games and merchandise. At least Daisy is still a part of Mario and she is starting to maker her way back to the “main series” recently.
You cannot be serious.And this is what I say when people let their bias taint their visions. No, Daisy is NOT a Mario Kart palette swap. She has different animations too in Mario Kart and in other games she plays very differently. In Mario Sports she is more powerful but less graceful in control than Peach. She can manipulate flowers to her advantage to blind and stop her opponents or to give her a boost throughout various Mario Party and Sports games. As for Toad, he has been left out of a few games, whilst Daisy was playable, because of his lack of ability to really do anything. Captain Toad cannot even jump.
If Dixie Kong was a more prominent character than Daisy is, then why could she not even get in Mario Maker, or even in many Donkey Kong themed places while Diddy Kong was recognised as both a Mario and Donkey Kong character? She has been forgotten in pretty much everything Nintendo related in the oast few years besides Tropical Freeze but Donkey Kong and Diddy Kong still keep appearing in games and merchandise. At least Daisy is still a part of Mario and she is starting to maker her way back to the “main series” recently.
Please, don't generalize. Because I could say the same of some fans of other characters...Protip: Attempting to tear down other characters doesn't make Daisy any more likely. It only continues to enforce the increasingly common viewpoint that Daisy fans are memoryman-level insane
I think the debate is absurd. Everyone has their opinion and that's it. Debate finished.If that's a viewpoint you think is unfair, I'd suggest not doing things that'd further perpetuate it. This day is about Daisy, not Dixie.
Oh I'm not the one generalizing. I'm just saying it's incredibly easy for others to do so, is all.Please, don't generalize. Because I could say the same of some fans of other characters...
I think the debate is absurd. Everyone has their opinion and that's it. Debate finished.
Let's not distort the subject, we should be happy for a new Smash Bros.
To her defense, not counting the 50 something spin-offs she appears in is kinda stupid.I dunno mate. Daisy appears in a sum total of one main series Mario game - no, I haven't counted the mobile game. Dixie is a playable character in 3 of them. She's not only far more important to her franchise than Daisy has ever been, she's also had the appearances to give her an actual inspiration for a moveset.
By the way it feels like it defeats the point to rag on about deluded DK fans and then argue the ballot as justification, because if they're deluded you're just demonstrably suffering the same symptoms.
...anyway, guess I should actually RTC...
Paper Mario
Chance: 20%
I don't think it's impossible but it's unlikely. I would expect Toad in first as he appears in the main games, whereas Paper Mario is a spin off.
Want: 25%
I don't really know the character or what he could do, but I'm not particularly opposed to him.
Daisy
Chance: 5%
As a low effort costume swap of Peach, but even still I feel this is pushing it given Daisy is pretty much relegated to a Mario Kart palette swap by this point. She was very quickly pushed to one side in favour of Rosalina and I can see her being pushed even further back by Pauline (who I also don't see as likely).
Want: 0%
What is it with this character? She's a spin off character with no relevance to the main series beyond a game released in 1989. She was dead for a decade before being brought back as a character in 2000 Power Tennis, and since then has been a filler in Mario sports games. She has no demonstrable moveset outside of filler abilities for Mario sports games, and if you're going to make a character hinging on self parody then Waluigi pulls it off better. Daisy would make a fun alt for Peach - even then with some issues like Toad - but nothing more.
I mean, a fan of a character tends to follow trends and appearances that others don't, it's a universal thing reallyI swear it seems like the only people who think Daisy is a likely candidate for Smash are huge Daisy fans themselves.
But Pauline is a Nintendo Starlet while Daisy isn't.I find it odd that people are using Pauline as a means to tear Daisy down while on her day she was torn down because she’s not as in many games as Daisy. I think there’s a bias people have against the characters that aren’t deemed likely/fan-favorites. I expect the same for Funky Kong or any other character that rivals fan-favorites.
First off - 50 games or 70? That's a pretty noticeable difference and you've mentioned both.To her defense, not counting the 50 something spin-offs she appears in is kinda stupid.
It's her forte, saying spin-offs don't count obviously ruins her chances, but who says they don't?
Yeah, spin-off characters tend to be filler, but since Daisy appears very consistently in spin-offs, even with small rosters (Mario Party: The Top 100 had EIGHT playable characters, including Daisy) we're long past the point where she's in because there's no one left to add.
Daisy's power isn't to magically appear in a big main game role: It's to have an admirable ability to be in every sports/party game Mario puts out on a dang consistent basis, being in 70 games in some form, which causes her to have a very strong casual appeal.
And are main games really that much better for moveset building than spin-offs?
Spin-off filler specials can build a consistent visual theme for a character in a way main games can't.
Of course a main game is better, but you gotta give some credit to spin-offs here and the characters that appear in it.
It's like saying you can't count the games where Ridley wasn't the final boss.
Yeah, being the final boss is cool and all and generally more important, but other appearances have value, even if significantly less so.
I don't get the fetish Daisy fans have when it comes to discrediting the DK series and I will never understand it. I've rated Daisy without bringing down other competitors and I hope other fans will continue to do the same.
I should clarify that my viewpoint (as a fan of neither character, though I admittedly prefer Pauline for various reasons) is that I think that after Pauline's reception, she is going to be pushed as the big new thing in Mario, much as Rosalina was. I don't think Pauline has a ghost of a chance for Smash Switch, but if she doesn't start appearing in Mario sports spinoffs soon I'd be very surprised, and if that happens I'd honestly rate her much higher than Daisy next time around.I find it odd that people are using Pauline as a means to tear Daisy down while on her day she was torn down because she’s not as in many games as Daisy. I think there’s a bias people have against the characters that aren’t deemed likely/fan-favorites. I expect the same for Funky Kong or any other character that rivals fan-favorites.
https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php...&useformat=mobile#List_of_appearances_by_dateFirst off - 50 games or 70? That's a pretty noticeable difference and you've mentioned both.
I don't think spin-offs ruin her chances, but I don't think they really add anything to her. Wikipedia suggests she's been in 57 games - that sounds like a lot but Waluigi has (by Super Mario Wiki) been in upwards of 50 as well, and he debuted a whole decade later! If Sakurai were to add her as something other than a Peach reskin, do we believe he cares enough to sort through all those games to put together that theme? Moreover, do we think he'd do it over Waluigi, who's already got something of the kind as an AT, and is arguably as popular on a casual level, even if its as a meme? Personally I don't.
I think Ridley is a false equivalence, by the way. If Daisy appeared in Super Mario Odyssey as the Princess of the Sand Kingdom (for example) then I'd be giving her a lot more consideration, but to me spinoffs aren't enough.
I should clarify that my viewpoint (as a fan of neither character, though I admittedly prefer Pauline for various reasons) is that I think that after Pauline's reception, she is going to be pushed as the big new thing in Mario, much as Rosalina was. I don't think Pauline has a ghost of a chance for Smash Switch, but if she doesn't start appearing in Mario sports spinoffs soon I'd be very surprised, and if that happens I'd honestly rate her much higher than Daisy next time around.
As in I guess my argument is that I don't think Daisy is becoming more relevant to Mario, I think Mario has another character it's gonna promote instead.
Nintendo uses their mobile efforts as a way for people who don’t have consoles to get familiar with their IP. Koizumi mentioned that a lot of people got familar with Mario with Mario Run, and he has play data to back it up. The fact that Daisy out of all the characters they chosen was added to that game, with her own song and mode, and the game was made by a handful of Nintendo’s veteran staff, should not be slept on at all.First off - 50 games or 70? That's a pretty noticeable difference and you've mentioned both.
I don't think spin-offs ruin her chances, but I don't think they really add anything to her. Wikipedia suggests she's been in 57 games - that sounds like a lot but Waluigi has (by Super Mario Wiki) been in upwards of 50 as well, and he debuted a whole decade later! If Sakurai were to add her as something other than a Peach reskin, do we believe he cares enough to sort through all those games to put together that theme? Moreover, do we think he'd do it over Waluigi, who's already got something of the kind as an AT, and is arguably as popular on a casual level, even if its as a meme? Personally I don't.
I think Ridley is a false equivalence, by the way. If Daisy appeared in Super Mario Odyssey as the Princess of the Sand Kingdom (for example) then I'd be giving her a lot more consideration, but to me spinoffs aren't enough.
I should clarify that my viewpoint (as a fan of neither character, though I admittedly prefer Pauline for various reasons) is that I think that after Pauline's reception, she is going to be pushed as the big new thing in Mario, much as Rosalina was. I don't think Pauline has a ghost of a chance for Smash Switch, but if she doesn't start appearing in Mario sports spinoffs soon I'd be very surprised, and if that happens I'd honestly rate her much higher than Daisy next time around.
As in I guess my argument is that I don't think Daisy is becoming more relevant to Mario, I think Mario has another character it's gonna promote instead.
Ah yeah, Boo is my favorite main Mario character.Nintendo uses their mobile efforts as a way for people who don’t have consoles to get familiar with their IP. Koizumi mentioned that a lot of people got familar with Mario with Mario Run, and he has play data to back it up. The fact that Daisy out of all the characters they chosen was added to that game, with her own song and mode, and the game was made by a handful of Nintendo’s veteran staff, should not be slept on at all.
Here are what Nintendo considers to be “main” Mario characters.
https://www.nintendo.co.jp/character/mario/characters/index.html
I will not dispute that it is iconic. Recently it has gotten more prominent roles in the Mario Sports games as a character.Ah yeah, Boo is my favorite main Mario character.
Nintendo said Run is a main Mario game (check out Mario Portal) so you have to count it. And DK games are main DK games not main Mario games...I dunno mate. Daisy appears in a sum total of one main series Mario game - no, I haven't counted the mobile game. Dixie is a playable character in 3 of them. She's not only far more important to her franchise than Daisy has ever been, she's also had the appearances to give her an actual inspiration for a moveset.
By the way it feels like it defeats the point to rag on about deluded DK fans and then argue the ballot as justification, because if they're deluded you're just demonstrably suffering the same symptoms.
...anyway, guess I should actually RTC...
Paper Mario
Chance: 20%
I don't think it's impossible but it's unlikely. I would expect Toad in first as he appears in the main games, whereas Paper Mario is a spin off.
Want: 25%
I don't really know the character or what he could do, but I'm not particularly opposed to him.
Daisy
Chance: 5%
As a low effort costume swap of Peach, but even still I feel this is pushing it given Daisy is pretty much relegated to a Mario Kart palette swap by this point. She was very quickly pushed to one side in favour of Rosalina and I can see her being pushed even further back by Pauline (who I also don't see as likely).
Want: 0%
What is it with this character? She's a spin off character with no relevance to the main series beyond a game released in 1989. She was dead for a decade before being brought back as a character in 2000 Power Tennis, and since then has been a filler in Mario sports games. She has no demonstrable moveset outside of filler abilities for Mario sports games, and if you're going to make a character hinging on self parody then Waluigi pulls it off better. Daisy would make a fun alt for Peach - even then with some issues like Toad - but nothing more.
Surprised Koopa and Goomba aren't there then. Is it just because Boos are cooler/cuter?I will not dispute that it is iconic. Recently it has gotten more prominent roles in the Mario Sports games as a character.
Considering that a lot of people who like Daisy gave her a low rated chance level... no it's not bias.There is bias in the thread today, and it's very noticeable - its the fact the only people giving Daisy a ghost of a chance are (big surprise) also giving her the 100% want rating.
I can kind of see why, no one wants to have the unpopular opinion and get ridiculed...Condidering that a lot of people who like Daisy gave her a low rated chance level... no it's not bias.
Do you want to provide a link to where Nintendo said Mario Run was a main series Mario game?Nintendo said Run is a main Mario game (check out Mario Portal) so you have to count it. And DK games are main DK games not main Mario games...
wutFirst.
Paper Mario
AND HE IS NOTHING LIKE MARIO!
Here:Do you want to provide a link to where Nintendo said Mario Run was a main series Mario game?
While it's not Dixie's day anymore, I think it has to do with the fact that Dixie Co-starred in a very popular game, and then starred in a game of her own. Daisy is usually just a side character in Mario Spin-offs when she is playable.Can someone tell me why Daisy has such a bad history but characters like Dixie Kong have a good one with Smash fans?
I mean it uses the Super Mario name, which is the brand-name of the mainline games. Even if Nintendo would want to look at Super Mario Run as a big Mario title, Toad and Toadette were playable in the game way before Daisy was. Additionally, looking at SMR as a member of the "Super Mario Bros." series, Toad has been playable and appeared in more games than Daisy.Here:
https://www.nintendo.co.jp/character/mario/collection/mariobros/index.html
Click on the star icon
DaisyThe Mario line sold > 100,000 figures in Japan in late 2016 (Media Create White Book)
Paper Mario:
Chance: 1%
I am still very shocked that people think Sakurai would add THREE Marios in the game. Absolutely not. Smash Bros is not desperate for other characters that are ACTUALLY other characters, especially in the Mario franchise. I can only see him get in if Intelligent Systems pushes him somehow.
Want: 0%
Terrible choice. This would be the equivalent for cutting Diddy Kong for Metal Mario in terms of how awful it would be. Sure, it has novelty, but at the end of the day, Paper Mario is still very much Mario.
Forgive my pessimism when it comes to our favorite fungus friend, but I feel our hope for him to appear is in the form of Captain Toad.I mean it uses the Super Mario name, which is the brand-name of the mainline games. Even if Nintendo would want to look at Super Mario Run as a big Mario title, Toad and Toadette were playable in the game way before Daisy was. Additionally, looking at SMR as a member of the "Super Mario Bros." series, Toad has been playable and appeared in more games than Daisy.
In a franchise like Smash, that really wants to have each character feel like they're straight out of their games, I don't know if Daisy's ability to double jump does much for her, at least against some Mario characters that have natural attributes and abilities that make them their own thing.
You can argue SMR gave Daisy something, but that's not considering what it supplied for her major competition either.
Interesting. However, even if they truly do consider it to be a core Mario game Daisy's inclusion in it most likely came too late for Sakurai to take note of it. I also think there are other more requested Mario characters that Sakurai would find more interesting.Here:
https://www.nintendo.co.jp/character/mario/collection/mariobros/index.html
Click on the star icon
Perfect timing for (semi)-clone antics though.Interesting. However, even if they truly do consider it to be a core Mario game Daisy's inclusion in it most likely came to late for Sakurai to take note of it. I also think there are other more requested Mario characters that Sakurai would find more interesting.