TheAnvil
Smash Hero
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2014
- Messages
- 5,457
Toadette?Is there even another? At risk of offending someone, no other Mario women are coming to my mind unless you count Birdo.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Toadette?Is there even another? At risk of offending someone, no other Mario women are coming to my mind unless you count Birdo.
If Captain Toad were to make it, I could see her as an alt. But as her own character... Naw.Toadette?
I agree with you, and I should have specified that I meant that Dixie had 3 playable appearances in DKC games. Apologies!Nintendo said Run is a main Mario game (check out Mario Portal) so you have to count it. And DK games are main DK games not main Mario games...
I am suggesting that high chance scores are always accompanied by high want scores, in the sense that people are being biased by their own desire for their character into giving them a higher score than they deserve.Considering that a lot of people who like Daisy gave her a low rated chance level... no it's not bias.
I would like to say one last thing. Daisy is the Princess of Flowers in the Mario series. She has a strong affinity with flowers and plants. It has been demonstrated in many games, even the Mario Party series where characters usually do not have special abilities. It is even in her name and jewellery.
We do not have many plant based fighters in Smash Bros at all. Waluigi does not have that to fall back on. Also, her physical stature and aggressiveness make her more suited to the whole sports rep thing. Please take this in mind when rating Daisy's chances.
I didn't know Waluigi could use Hermit Purple!
You were saying?
I actually haven't seen much merit in the spin off argument for a while now, at least in the case of the Mario series post Smash 4. Arguably every staple character of the mainline Super Mario series (besides a Toad) is playable. I'd even argue Rosalina was the first character from Mario that wasn't really needed (Fine addition, but nowhere near the importance of the Bros, the damsel, or the family of Koopas).- Being in a main, game (before or after Toads doesn't matter) deconfirms the "irrelevant spin-off character" argument
Not really Mario persay, but Ashley or Captain Syrup? Them and Waluigi are both commonly associated with Wario.Ok so hear me out, We rated:
Captain Toad with Pauline
Paper Mario with Daisy
I suggest we rate Waluigi with another Mario girl
I didn't know Waluigi could use Hermit Purple!
The opposite is also true. A lot of people are giving her a zero percent chance (which should technically be impossible unless they were confirmed to not make an appearance) and, well, they do not have particularly high want scores either. There is obviously going to be a correlation; however, it goes both ways. Another odd trend is a lot of people placing her at 4% or 14%, both relatively low scores. They arbitrarily cannot seem to round that up to a 5 despite all of their other scores ending in a 0 or 5. Both parties are biased and that is not a problem in this thread as that is more or less the point.I agree with you, and I should have specified that I meant that Dixie had 3 playable appearances in DKC games. Apologies!
I am suggesting that high chance scores are always accompanied by high want scores, in the sense that people are being biased by their own desire for their character into giving them a higher score than they deserve.
You were saying?
Yes, we need Waluigi with his stand, Za WAH!I didn't know Waluigi could use Hermit Purple!
Ever hear of a series called...Man, it was definitely a missed opportunity for a Waluigi and Daisy day, the war would have been funnnn. Well, who else besides Mario characters can draw strong controversy?
I disagree with the katest oart if the post refered to me, Daisy can pull off the flower based moveset better than Waluigi: glowers are Daisy's symbol in Mario, they are on her jewels, her name, her origins, most if tge powers. Yeah Waluigi had a plant based attack but that's it, I'm not saying he gas not potential on this sector but speaking of flower powers Daisy takes the cake.I actually haven't seen much merit in the spin off argument for a while now, at least in the case of the Mario series post Smash 4. Arguably every staple character of the mainline Super Mario series (besides a Toad) is playable. I'd even argue Rosalina was the first character from Mario that wasn't really needed (Fine addition, but nowhere near the importance of the Bros, the damsel, or the family of Koopas).
With all important characters out of the way, it makes sense that the literal millions of Mario fans have their other characters they want. Someone put it perfectly earlier and said that these Mario characters are basically in a "pack", usually Waluigi, Paper Mario, Captain Toad, Geno, Daisy, the all mighty THWOMP etc, who, surprise surprise, are all popularized from spin offs. They're pretty much all thats left for Mario reps.
The spin off argument makes sense for other series; no one is cheering for Kalypso from DK Barrel Blast or Pinkle from Tingles rosy RuppeeLand. Most non-Mario series still have their fair share of staple characters yet to appear. While many would prefer if Mario took a breather to allow these other series to shine, I think Mario is too much of a money maker to not add at least one new character. So at the very least, Daisy has that. Not much else though.
All that said, I still don't realistically see Daisy with all other Mario characters against her. The 3 things I've seen brought up for her move set the most here are the sports, personality, and flower power. Sporty moveset and personality could very well go to the more popular Waluigi, and it may be a stretch, but they could make a flower power/plant based fighter out of Petey Piranha if they wanted to focus on that for a move set. Basically, as I see it, anything she can do can be done by someone else from her games and executed better. Long post, I know, but it seems the Daisy people like to debunk this like it's pre brawl days, while I don't see this as the issue Daisy fans should worry about.
TLDR- The spinoff argument doesn't work for or against her; the fact shes facing fierce competition from other Mario characters on her level is what's really bringing her chances down imo.
Not really Mario persay, but Ashley or Captain Syrup? Them and Waluigi are both commonly associated with Wario.
This is true, however the same thing can be applied to people who don't want Daisy, they give her low want and low chance too. This is my only problem with this thread, bias is always here...I am suggesting that high chance scores are always accompanied by high want scores, in the sense that people are being biased by their own desire for their character into giving them a higher score than they deserve.
25 feels like too high of a cutoff, especially for so soon. 15/20, maybe? I don't mind the list being more cluttered if it means more noms, and sometimes surprising noms make it up. (Then again, I'm nominating people with the goal of more being 2nd wave than first for the most part, so maybe that's part of it). Plus, what happens with new characters getting put on?FYI the only reason Waluigi was not on the initial schedule is just that the Daisy support thread was so huge. I would have put him on over Daisy if it wasn't so big. Either way Waluigi has a ton of noms so he should be rated in the coming weeks.
Also as a housekeeping note, the noms list is starting to get cluttered with nominations under 10, in fact it takes up a strong portion of the noms list. I will wait as it is not too big of a problem yet, but soon, most likley sometime in April, I will give a notice to nominate some of these up by a certain date, and anything under 25 will be taken off for the time being.
All Miyamoto said was that Paper Mario didn't need a story, which is incredibly stupid but, there was a survey after Super's release and no one commented on the story so IS decided we didn't need one (the one time Nintendo actually pays attention to the fans) and to use Super Mario World characters. He didn't say cut partners, he didn't say make every character a toad, and he didn't say replace the turn-based battle system with garbage item management that makes fighting enemies completely pointless. No the current state of Paper Mario is all Intelligent System's fault.I like PM--the REAL ones, BM (before Miyamoto.) Paper Mario could be very unique, but I'd rather have it repped by a different PM character, one that isn't already on the roster in some form. Of course, PM is now devoid of original characters, so...
Yeah, Miyamoto would have influenced the simplification of the system... but... that wasn't his intention... He just wanted them to focus in make a fun game.All Miyamoto said was that Paper Mario didn't need a story, which is incredibly stupid but, there was a survey after Super's release and no one commented on the story so IS decided we didn't need one (the one time Nintendo actually pays attention to the fans) and to use Super Mario World characters. He didn't say cut partners, he didn't say make every character a toad, and he didn't say replace the turn-based battle system with garbage item management that makes fighting enemies completely pointless. No the current state of Paper Mario is all Intelligent System's fault.
All Miyamoto said was that Paper Mario didn't need a story, which is incredibly stupid but, there was a survey after Super's release and no one commented on the story so IS decided we didn't need one (the one time Nintendo actually pays attention to the fans) and to use Super Mario World characters. He didn't say cut partners, he didn't say make every character a toad, and he didn't say replace the turn-based battle system with garbage item management that makes fighting enemies completely pointless. No the current state of Paper Mario is all Intelligent System's fault.
Well, perhaps I was a bit harsh toward Miyamoto...you both make good points. I just remembered the quote and was going from that. In general, I'm just incredibly disappointed with what happened to PM...blaming someone isn't gonna fix the problem. I fear one of my favorite series will never go back to how it was.Yeah, Miyamoto would have influenced the simplification of the system... but... that wasn't his intention... He just wanted them to focus in make a fun game.
After all, Miyamoto is a guy that appreciate a game for it's gameplay-value mostly
I know, right??? I'm just about to start on the noms, and it's looking like a marathon...Day OVER, OH MY THIS IS GONNA TAKE SOME TIME, EXPECT CALCS TOMORROW MORNING