Radical's Radical Kingmaker { ASSASSINS WIN SOME RADICAL TIMES }

[RadicalRat]

LOYAL CITIZENS OF RADICAL-LAND, GATHER ROUND!

I HAVE RECEIVED THIS MORNING AN ORDER FROM THE KINGMAKER!

SPAK HAS BEEN DECLARED TODAY'S KING, AND HOLDS OUR HUMBLE VILLAGE'S FATE IN HIS ROYAL HANDS!

I HAVE ALSO RECEIVED AN ANONYMOUS LETTER...

"!@#$ the Kingmakers, we'll make this village ours now!"

SPAK, YOUR HIGHNESS, PLEASE SAVE US FROM THESE VILLAINS!

 

[TheKingofKoopas]

Kingmaker may be inactive /Koopa (/kappa).

I'm very offended by this.
In the spirit of RVS I'm going to Imaginary Vote: Spak.

 

[Spak]

TOTALLY RAD! I shall do my best. Although there is no actual voting, I will keep unofficial voting so that everyone has a say in what happens. I'll excecute the most popular lynch choice unless I am in direct opposition to that execution, at which point I will choose the second most popular, so on and so forth. Think of it as a veto. I there's a huge backlash from my suggestion I will either wash the blood from my hands and order the execution or declare the population is drunk and kill who I think would be appropriate.

 

[Spak]

I'm very offended by this.
In the spirit of RVS I'm going to Imaginary Vote: Spak.

Thanks for imaginary-voting my joke.

Imaginary-Vote: /Koopa

P.S. Not gonna kill myself

 

[Spak]

(Add bold to that imaginary-vote).

 

[Spak]

Also, Rad should tag everyone to denote the start of D1.

 

[Maven89]

Interesting

What do people think of Spak's suggestion of still voting for his execute? On one hand, it gives town more control. On the other hand, it's completely removes any culpability on his part of the execute. Would we be better off forcing him to make a decision then we would telling him what to do?

Right now I'm not sure, my gut leans towards the later

 

[Spak]

Interesting

What do people think of Spak's suggestion of still voting for his execute? On one hand, it gives town more control. On the other hand, it's completely removes any culpability on his part of the execute. Would we be better off forcing him to make a decision then we would telling him what to do?

Right now I'm not sure, my gut leans towards the later

I don't want to be a power-hungry fool; I want other's input on who should be executed, but as I stated, I have the final decision. I will always take personal responsibility for any death under my reign as King because I sealed the execution with my cool signet ring.

 

[RadicalRat]

1. @ Zalak
2. @ TheKingofKoopas
3. @Orboknown
4. @ Kaladin
5. @ Spak
6. Maven89
7. #HBC | J
8. @SangfroidWarrior
9. ~ Gheb ~

Consider it tagged.

 

[~ Gheb ~]

I'll excecute the most popular lynch choice

No, you won't.

You'll lynch who you think is scum.

 

[Spak]

No, you won't.

You'll lynch who you think is scum.

Very well. I guess the democracy is voting to not be a democracy. I'll not keep the temp. vote count and I'll just kill the most scummy person at the end of the day.

 

[#HBC | J]

Don't let yourself be bullied into doing what you don't wanna do haha. Just got for it if you think someone is likely to flip Scum.

However, people suggesting names is a good way to get a paper trail and a "vote count" isn't bad either. It's always good to lock people into making stances.

This is odd because this is also my first kingmaker and so I'm curious as to how certain things will work.

 

[Kaladin]

Radical land -.-

So, this seems weird. How does RVS work here?

 

[~ Gheb ~]

We can still do the whole "imaginary vote" thing, it'll probably have some use.

 

[Spak]

Nah, it'll be more iinteresting without a vote count and I can just ask opinions at the end of the day. I want it to be less like Mafia and more like Kingmaker.

 

[Spak]

Radical land -.-

So, this seems weird. How does RVS work here?

Beats me. I'm just trying to make up strats on the fly lol

 

[TheKingofKoopas]

I guess we don't need RVS considering we're already debating the use of King Spak involving democracy in a monarchy.

 

[TheKingofKoopas]

Votes would still be a nice way of showing what everyone thinks. I guess I'll just use FoS for now.

 

[Spak]

(Also, don't be afraid to pick apart and criticize my posts; killing me is fair game tomorrow and I don't like execution from asking fair questions).

 

[Kaladin]

(Also, don't be afraid to pick apart and criticize my posts; killing me is fair game tomorrow and I don't like execution from asking fair questions).

Killing you is fair game today. Suicide is always the answer! Vote: Spak

 

[Spak]

Killing you is fair game today. Suicide is always the answer! Vote: Spak

 

[Kaladin]

Do or do not. There is no try.

 

[Spak]

(Battery is at 3% and I'm a decent distance from home)

 

[Spak]

Do or do not. There is no try.

Attempting and failing is trying.

 

[~ Gheb ~]

Actually Spak, I kinda would like to know what made you change your mind on the whole voting thing so quickly. Feel free to answer this whenever you have time.

 

[Spak]

Actually Spak, I kinda would like to know what made you change your mind on the whole voting thing so quickly. Feel free to answer this whenever you have time.

It was a combination of me realizing that would make it just a game of Mafia + a Radical castle theme and the fact it would be a bunch of extra effort (mod-level vote count dedication) for something I could just ask people's opinions about at the end of the day.

 

[Spak]

Never mind, I was closer than I thought lol. Off mobile at the moment, but will be going to a picnic in about two hours (which could go horribly because of the weather we've been having in NC).

 

[Zalak]

Don't let yourself be bullied into doing what you don't wanna do haha. Just got for it if you think someone is likely to flip Scum.

However, people suggesting names is a good way to get a paper trail and a "vote count" isn't bad either. It's always good to lock people into making stances.

This is odd because this is also my first kingmaker and so I'm curious as to how certain things will work.

yeah, i agree, we should make sure everyone posts their stances, but Spak should execute who he thinks will flip scum.

 

[Zalak]

Spak

THAT'S ALL WELL AND GOOD, but what exactly made you decide to have a vote in the first place? I know if I were playing scum, I might try to use that to cover up for my mislynch.

 

[Zalak]

TheKingofKoopas

IS THERE A SINGLE GOOD REASON FOR ME TO TRUST YOU!?????????

 

[Spak]

Spak

THAT'S ALL WELL AND GOOD, but what exactly made you decide to have a vote in the first place? I know if I were playing scum, I might try to use that to cover up for my mislynch.

Because I wanted it to be a majority opinion, but I can get majority opinions by asking end-of-day.

 

[Zalak]

Because I wanted it to be a majority opinion, but I can get majority opinions by asking end-of-day.

But why did you want it to be a majority opinion?

 

[Spak]

But why did you want it to be a majority opinion?

Because I grew up in a democratic republic of a society and because of that, I have been programmed to automatically think it is the most fair system of government.

 

[Spak]

NOOOOO I edited ;-;

 

[Zalak]

UH OH..............................

 

[Spak]

I said "Democratic" when I meant "Democratic Republic" and violated the rule I noted should have been put in.

I usually like irony...

 

[~ Gheb ~]

Because I grew up in a democratic republic of a society and because of that, I have been programmed to automatically think it is the most fair system of government.

Mafia has precious little to do with fairness though. I mean, I'll have to accept your answer but I think your thought process behind the whole thing is flaws. If you're given the power to bypass a town's ****tyness then compromising on it is the wrong approach.

 

[TheKingofKoopas]

I said "Democratic" when I meant "Democratic Republic" and violated the rule I noted should have been put in.

I usually like irony...

RIP in peace Spak

TheKingofKoopas

IS THERE A SINGLE GOOD REASON FOR ME TO TRUST YOU!?????????

Is there a single good reason for me to trust YOU?

 

[Zalak]

Is there a single good reason for me to trust YOU?

no, not yet.

 

[Spak]

If you're given the power to bypass a town's ****tyness then compromising on it is the wrong approach.

I said I could override them at any point, though. So it would be more of a constitutional monarchy with the monarch having actual power.