What exactly about the wolf makes it even close to as good as the masks?
I'd say that he's just as good, the quadreped status, the ability to dig and sense alongside the ability to talk to animals (a small one, but still).
Spider-man doesn't have to crawl it's just easier. He can walk if he wants to.
Actually, his leg strength is only proportionate to a spider his size, that is to say, not superhumanly strong, but that's beside the matter.
No, not really. It was in a older game therefore it was old.
Yes the ball and chain was old, but the
concept of using it yourself was new.
Get real dude. It was just like WW so get off it.
Yes, but unlike WW you didn't have to sale for 50% of the game.
How can it be the basis when EVERY SINGLE GAME USED THE SAME ONE, INCLUDING THE ONES IN DEVELOPMENT FOR THE WII BEFORE TP? (I love using capitals for emphasis don't you?)
Fine, I'll give the targeting system wasn't huge, but it still was something new, and at least that's something.
Or maybe it takes real innovation to impress me and not just ripping off spider-man.
Or maybe they weren't ripping off of Spider-man and you're just paranoid.
Wow, saving 5 seconds is such innovation.
If you think about how many times you'll need to shave those second off you've saved an hour.
It does matter that it was thought up before TP because it means they where simply reusing an old concept that was thrown away.
And brought it to frutation, sheesh! If it was used in this game for the first time, than that game broke ground with the idea.
I truly do not care what a bunch of idiots on the internet say. You said no magic was adding to Zelda which it obviously doesn't as taking something out =/= adding something new.
Idiots on the internet?
Really?
Let's look at what others had to say:
Reviews and awards
Compilations of multiple reviews
Game Rankings Wii: 94.6% (based on 76 reviews)
GCN: 96% (based on 17 reviews)
Metacritic Wii: 95% (based on 69 reviews)
GCN: 96% (based on 16 reviews)
Publication Response Award
1UP Wii: 10 of 10 Best Adventure Game of 2006
Game of the Year 2006
EGM Wii: 10/10/10 Game of the Year 2006
Best Level Design 2006
Best Battle System 2006
Famitsu Wii: 38 of 40
GameSpot Wii: 8.8 of 10
GCN: 8.9 of 10
Best Wii Game of 2006
Best GameCube Game for 2006
GameSpy Wii: 5 of 5 Editor's Choice
2006 Game of the Year
Game Informer Both: 10 of 10 Game of the Year
Game of the Month: January 2007
IGN Wii: 9.5 of 10
GCN: 9.5 of 10
Both versions: Editors Choice
Best Wii Game of 2006
Best GameCube Game of 2006
Reader's Choice Game of 2006
Nintendo Power Wii: 9.5 of 10
GCN: 9.5 of 10
Best Wii Game of 2006
Best GameCube Game of 2006
Best Adventure Game of 2006
Game of the Year 2006
Best Story/Writing of 2006
Best Music (Reader's choice)
Best Graphics
Best New Character (Midna)
Official
Nintendo
Magazine
Wii: 97%
GCN: 96%
Gold Award
X-Play Wii: 5 of 5 Game of the Year
Best Action/Adventure Game
[quote[Is this the military? No. This IS ZELDA! (Couldn't resist the 300 reference) the only puzzles the water bombs where used for was blowing crap up underwater in the same fashion you would blow crap up on the surface.[/quote]
Sigh. You still can't see that, even if TP, as you say, brought nothing to the Wii, it still was an
excellent game that deserves to be represented in Brawl.
If you REALLY believe TP is better than all those classic games then you don't deserve to call yourself a Zelda fan.
Who are you to say who's a fan or not? I
love Zelda! Nor am I saying that TP is the best Zelda game ever. OoT beats out, hands down, and it probably never will. But does that make TP any less of a great game?
No! Twilight Princess is an excellent game, but it isn't the best, but definitely up there.
Considering that whole thing was just another of your pointless rants there was nothing else to really comment on.
No, I have a point, unlike you, who merely bounce back what ever I say to you and twist it into a negetive. But my point quite clearly is that TP is a great game that is so great that it deserves to be included in Brawl, and by Midna, no less.
And the fact that I elaborate on this, not for my benifit, but rather, to enlighten you to the truth and what do you do? Do you elaborate on how I applauded Midna's character? Delve deeper into the inner workings of the game itself or perhaps debate the sales on TP or the roster for Brawl. No, all you do is focus on one simile I made and scream in large font that you like a movie that was trying to be a kiddie movie that also tried to make itself dark at the same time. Bob Hopskins, John Leguizamo, and Dennis Hooper will never live it down.
So a character that uses you like a tool for half the game then has a change of heart and falls in love with you doesn't sound like Midna?
Yes, when you put it in basic, neanderthallian terms, but you have totally discluded things like characer history and development, motivation, and overall
appearance, and if you won't see the diffrence between a Twili Imp who is really a princess who is fighting back for her throne against her evil reletive by guiding you to a super powerful headpiece that she then uses to turn into a big @$$ monster that smashes open a sheild an fight God Ganon and a Fairy who lost her sibling and bosses you around with virtually no character development until the very end where she says she'll miss you then you quite clearly are more ignorant than I previously believed.
'Nuff said.