yeah mindgames is dumbbrawl is weak climax
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
yeah mindgames is dumbbrawl is weak climax
are you going to the jiggs? I just got home from it but I would have loved to have taken your money.Climax brawl mm?
The analog stick works wonders.So Brawl seems pretty awful to me, anyone know how your supposed to move and space yet?
Kind of a flawed argument because A: Brawl is easier (in terms of the physics being more forgiving) and thus more accessible and B: competitive smashing didn't really exist when Melee came out.The game only just came out and it's getting a lot more attention in the competitive scene.
Encyclopedia.com:There are no dictionary entries for "competitive smashing"
Wikepeida.com:No results were found for ""competitive smashing""
I'm still not sure it exists...There is no page titled ""competitive smashing"".
Oh, it's not on wikipedia, it has its own wikiWikepeida.com:
I'm still not sure it exists...
LOLMaybe you should email Encarta and they can cut something out of their article on Saudi Arabia-like its husbandry practices or something-so they can fit in an article on a video game being played competitively.
That really doesn't shed any light as to why it's considered flawed.Kind of a flawed argument because A: Brawl is easier (in terms of the physics being more forgiving) and thus more accessible and B: competitive smashing didn't really exist when Melee came out.
Yes, but there is way more momentum behind melee going into brawl than there was with 64 going into melee. I was just pointing out that saying brawl is better because there is more interest in tournaments so early on in its release wasn't valid because the circumstances were different.That really doesn't shed any light as to why it's considered flawed.
It builds off the momentum Melee had as Melee did with Smash 64.
Questioning it's competitive value doesn't make sense considering there's plenty of tournaments already scheduled.
Like everyone else said, it doesn't matter if it's "competitive" or not, it's fun, and that's the whole reason to play a game.
HOLY **** YOU ARE RIGHTi remember now, this game reminds me of power stone for dreamcast.
thanks, good to know my fans are still out there kicking.Wow Guy you are so cool!!!!!
Yeah I agree on thisHa ha. Neither game is more competitive than the other. It's the players that are competitive. MvC2 is a good example of a fighter with an amazing competitive scene regardless of in-game flaws.
(correction fool!!!)timmy's King Dedede is ****.
osu3 which he wonSo has MCS ***** people lately?
Was bored looking at BC's sig before Gameclucks.
Melee is far more suited for competitive play than Brawl. I agree it's the players that are competitive, but you could be a competitive player who is way into ****ing Mario Party and that doesn't make the game a good competitive game.Ha ha. Neither game is more competitive than the other. It's the players that are competitive. MvC2 is a good example of a fighter with an amazing competitive scene regardless of in-game flaws.
King Dedede is ****.