Tingle for SSB4 Top Tier.
I disagree.
Tingle for AT is more like it.
He is not guaranteed to be in, his chances are not better than Ridley, Isaac, Bowser Jr, Paper Mario, and others.
First of all, I hate tingle. But I kind of agree with ROckem7. Why should someone take the place of a more deserving character. Personally I'd be ok with 2 more LoZ characters. Tingle and Vaati. Vaati may not be in the best of games, but he's the next most important character since he's a secondary villain.
As for clones, Wolf is similar to fox. They aren't exactley the same, but you can tell Wolf was based off of Fox's moveset. I will say he is a luigified clone. You have to agree with that because the definition of a luigified clone is really if they have similar B moves and a few other moves Similar.
The most cloned character to the least cloned.
Toon Link (He is just faster, without any wind in his boomerang)
Ganon (Like toon link, but at least he's in a different series.)
Falco ( Though he is on his way to be luigified, he's still pretty cloney)
Wolf (Similar B moves)
Luigi ( Only 2 similar B moves)
But I am now ok with clones, because they give us someone new to play, without adding extra time to a wait. If we could have 50 completely original characters or 60 characters with 15 being clones, I would go for 60.
The thing is, he will be taking up places that more deserving characters should have. Everyone constantly wants more Mario, Zelda and Pokemon. When I suggest Leaf, I was trying to keep pokemon to a minimum. We have the necessary Zelda characters, we need no more. I can see where people are coming from with Bowser Jr. and Paper Mario, but we only need one of them. This is a Nintendo fighter, not Mario vs. Zelda vs. Pokemon.
People need to realize that Wolf, Falco, Toon Link, Ganondorf and Lucas are all based on other fighters.
Fox -> Falco, Wolf
Link -> Toon Link
Cap Falcon -> Ganondorf
Ness -> Lucas
They were derived from those 4 base movesets. They are technically, "Technically" clones. Yes they have things different from them, but I could care less if Fox's buster stuns while Falcos knocks you back. You are trying to make something different by pushing the scope so close to the character they start to pixelate. (I know there A moves are different. Sakurai had to show Lucas A moves to try and trick everyone into seeing that he was different from Ness. Why do you think he did that?)
An example of this is Street Fighter.
Look at Ryu. Ken, Dan, Akuma, Cyber Akuma, Sean. Evil Ryu and Evil Ken are all consider clones of Ryu. Are they exact matches? No. They all have moves unique to themselves. They were are still derived from Ryu and can still be seen as Shonto Clones.
Look at Mortal Kombat. Remember all the Ninja's? They were clone sprites, but they all had unique Special Moves (normal moves for everyone was practically clone in that series.)
In Power Stone 2, Pride and Mel were considered clones even though their FS were unique.
In Smash bros melee, Young Link was considered a clone even though he was smaller, could wall jump, had different taunts and different stats for his B moves. (Fire arrows.)
Urien is considered a clone of Gill in Street fighter 3 even though both play differently.
This happens with all games. Robo Ky and Order Sol from Guilty Gear are some of the newest to fall into that hole.