KFC said:
lol yeah, i guess. even tho i killed myself when HK was dying.
A loss is a loss, irregardless of what happened in game 2 you still lost game 3 and the set, don't complain about it and get better instead.
KFC said:
panelists are hella ******** LOL, mike didnt play in 1 tournament the entire time between the last rankings and this one, and for some reason he is still on? i know if mike played, and if this list had any accuracy in it, then mike would be like 8. and hydrokirby should be 15... for beating my marth... lol
Your right Mike didn't play at all this period, but this period was all of 6 weeks long. He has on the other hand played in 2 tournaments in the last 3 months, and because he did not participate in the past 6 weeks he was moved down 3 spots.
KFC said:
i still dont think i should be below phil and hmw. if somebody could explain to me in detail as to why im below them, then yeah. id like to know, im just curious. cus i beat phil and hmw consistently, and tang too. who has phil and hmw beaten that i havent...? i know that hmw beat zhu, that was legit. but what else?
Personally I thought you went way too high to begin with, you beat Mitchell twice, once at WCSL and again at Zhu 2, didn't do anything at the Stockton tournament, but the others disagreed. Yet in the same period Phil also beat Mitchell twice and attend more tournaments with no major loses.
In this period Phil beat Shroomed, Zelgadis and The Germ at Davis lost to Ranked people at SCSA and lost to you and Mango at Quak's.
Brandon only lost to Paul and Falcomist in Davis, at SCSA he beat Zhu and lost to Mango and Tofu. Finally he lost to you and German at Quaks.
Both had 3 tournaments in which they attended.
You on the other hand had Quak's where although you beat both Phil and Brandon(Which you should of since you are ranked higher then them), you also lost to Hydrokirby. A good win, even a great win doesn't look any where near as good when you have it coupled with a bad loss.
Brandon and Phil both beat people ahead of them on the rankings without losing to people ranked below them. You beat nobody ahead of you and lost to someone not ranked.
is my drop in rankings because i lost to hydrokirby?
if my drop in rankings was cus of hydrokirby, then alot of ppls rankings should drop, like lunin who lost to keffin. >_>
Yes, losing to an unranked player has major effect on your placing. The difference is you don't have a huge win in the period but instead have a huge loss.
Lunin loss to Kheffin was taken in consideration as was his wins over everyone else under him and beating Jeff not once but twice in the prior period. If your going to try and discredit someone try an easier target, not someone who actually goes even and most of the time wins against SS.