lol sry to be a jerk about it, but then dont show if you think you deserve to go to half the tourneys and think you already won. what you are saying is that for those who are equal in skill, one should sky rocket wih points. well, im sry that my rule doesn't sit well with you. i know you mean well, but if it bothers you so much then do that at your tourney. much love to you magus and believe me if you do host something like it i'll show out of love and respect. but i'll still run my tourney the way it was planned. the winner of my tourney gets a wii system so i will not make it that easy to win bc someone earned massive points bc of a win that prolly wasn't that great in skill level above the other.
lmao blue, the issue is that you're making it easy for someone who lives nearby and not making it fair to people who can't come as often. Say there are ten of these "Blue Battle Circuit" tournaments.
Suppose localA goes to all ten of them and gets 13th at all of them.
localA now has 60 points.
btw these are some of the following ways to get 13th if 26 ppl are there
1)
lose immediately in winners with no bye
win two matches in losers bracket
lose
2)
lose in winners with no bye
get a bye
win one match in losers
lose
3)
win one match in winners with no bye
lose
win one match in losers
lose
possibly more?
Interestingly enough...lets look at one possible way to get 17th
win one match in winners with no bye
lose
lose
This is the same amount of wins as someone who got 13th. Let's say just to pick the worst possible option, that localA got 13th every time via the second possibility. With a total of ten wins in tournament, they are at 60 points.
Now let's say curseOfFiveB comes to five tournaments and gets fifth at all of them. He has 60 points.
some ways to get fifth
1)
bye
win
lose
win
win
lose
2)
win
win
win
lose
lose
Both of these include three wins. curseOfFiveB has gotten fifteen wins in tournament. localA has gotten ten wins in tournament. curseOfFiveB had to beat better people later in the bracket and localA had to beat someone who was sent to losers fairly early.
Now let's talk about bracketRapedC. bracketRapedC came to all ten of the tournaments but got 17th at all of them and won one match at every tournament. bracketRapedC has 40 points. bracketRapedC has won the same amount of times as localA but because his brackets are always unlucky he got 17th while localA got 13th.
To summarize, curseOfFiveB is obviously more skilled and has even won more often then localA but he has the SAME amount of points. bracketRapedC has come to the same amount of tournaments as localA, he has the same amount of tournament wins as localA, but he has 2/3s the amount of points. Is this really fair? I call shenanigans.