Khoru
Smash Champion
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2013
- Messages
- 2,530
please don't remind me that the official localization wouldn't/won't use "fassad"Fassad amiibo when
Perfect microwave fodder
rip
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
please don't remind me that the official localization wouldn't/won't use "fassad"Fassad amiibo when
Perfect microwave fodder
FFIV? But there's only 3 Final Fantasy games on the SNESoh yeah i'm playing final fantasy iv now
this is pretty much my first exposure to it
i mean i know a basic overview of the series but not much specific
You say that but I actually want a Waluigi amiiboThese three amiibos should be in the next wave in the Smash Bros. line.
Then, all we need to do is wait for Vegeta to eventually come out and we'll be all set.
That video's been around for a while.I just found this interesting Smash theory:
This theory suggests that the Smash Bros. games are all in the mind of an autistic child.
Would probably buy them all.These three amiibos should be in the next wave in the Smash Bros. line.
Then, all we need to do is wait for Frieza to eventually come out and we'll be all set.
The fact we haven't gotten wave two to the Mario Line just baffles me.You say that but I actually want a Waluigi amiibo
You should see the Zelda fanbase trying to overcomplicate the simplest timeline possible thenThat video's been around for a while.
I don't really like game theories like this one that over-complicate the games.
I do like vgl jokes however.That video's been around for a while.
I don't really like game theories like this one that over-complicate the games.
As a Zelda fan, I am well aware.You should see the Zelda fanbase trying to overcomplicate the simplest timeline possible then
Believe some of the Zelda fan theories can get pretty stupid, like saying Zelda is actually secretly evil or that the Hylian race are genocidal maniacs...You should see the Zelda fanbase trying to overcomplicate the simplest timeline possible then
A timeline with copious amounts of time travel and parallel universes is anything but simple.You should see the Zelda fanbase trying to overcomplicate the simplest timeline possible then
Like how I watched Kill la Kill for the plotAs a Zelda fan, I am well aware.
I'm going to be completely honest, despite being a big fan of Zelda, I don't give a flying **** about the overarching story of the games. I just play Zelda for the gameplay, the music, and the characters.
I actually once saw a theory that said Din and Demise were livers and that Sheik is a totally different person from ZeldaBelieve some of the Zelda fan theories can get pretty stupid, like saying Zelda is actually secretly evil or that the Hylian race are genocidal maniacs...
Keyword: possibleA timeline with copious amounts of time travel and parallel universes is anything but simple.
Obviously I don't agree with all of @Kalimdori's sentiments.I can t be the only person who agrees with this 100% @Kalimdori great video
Wait, Nintendo actually did provide patch notes for all the characters in Japanese? Props to them! If only we could get NOA to do that...Obviously I don't agree with all of @Kalimdori's sentiments.
1. @Aeris translated the patch notes. They were featured on reddit and the front page of SmashBoards at least. They weren't hard to find, at least 15,000 people viewed them directly on Source Gaming. They were also featured on Nintendo Everything. I do agree 100% that Nintendo should've included the patch notes in English.
2. He calls people who believe that costumes are de-confirmation "stupid" and then later says it's a real possibility in his video. Either way, this isn't a good attitude to have in the community. No one is "stupid". There are only people who have different interpretations of the facts. The only people who are "stupid" are the ones that are blatant making up stuff/ ignoring facts when it's convenient for them.
3. Mentions the Ridley debacle. Which is as bright as day evidence that the community takes anything that's ambiguous and runs in the opposite direction. For crying out loud the screen he showed says 'Other boss characters may appear'. That should've been Ridley's death then and there, but people wanted to hold onto false hope and hype. I know retrospect is 20/20, but common.
4. He says Sakurai hates K. Rool. Yeah, because Sakurai also hates Goku. He hated Dedede until sometime in in 2006 as Dedede wasn't in any Smash games until then. There's a lot of stuff that goes into designing and picking the characters for Smash. It's not as simple as "I hate this character. Time not include him". Frankly, that's a very immature way of looking at it, and I hope the community grows out of it. It's more like "This character doesn't work because XYZ". Why wasn't Llyod featured in the game over Pac-Man? Maybe it's because he had a popular game on the Gamecube and we are now on the Wii U. Why is he a costume now? To appease the fans, obviously.
5. Tourney mode complaining. I get this. There's a lot of features not in it that should be. Also, my personal theory is the whole 3 minute timeline for stocks -- it's for replays. It's an awful game design choice as it doesn't reflect how tourneys are played. But then again Smash isn't a fighter. It's classified as "action-based fighter" (or an "opponent based action game" depending on what translation you prefer)
I do like the actual video. @Kalimdori did a great job selecting footage that matched up with what he was talking about. His speech style is also effective. I do largely agree with his sentiments on the Mii Fighter Costumes, but making them actually play somewhat like their character would require a lot more work. Work that is going to be extremely limited.
Okay, now that I finished "responding" (see Etika, I responded and yet I'm still a news source. You can do both.) I'm going to put up the interview with the Dr. Mario fake leakers up. Give me ~30 minutes as I need coffee.
Sorry, not patch notes but the update information. If we had patch notes in Japanese it would be a lot easier to distribute.Wait, Nintendo actually did provide patch notes for all the characters in Japanese? Props to them! If only we could get NOA to do that...
Back to square one again...Sorry, not patch notes but the update information. If we had patch notes in Japanese it would be a lot easier to distribute.
Rekt? Rekt.Obviously I don't agree with all of @Kalimdori's sentiments.
1. @Aeris translated thepatch notesupdate information. They were featured on reddit and the front page of SmashBoards at least. They weren't hard to find, at least 15,000 people viewed them directly on Source Gaming. They were also featured on Nintendo Everything. I do agree 100% that Nintendo should've included thepatch notesupdate information in English.
2. He calls people who believe that costumes are de-confirmation "stupid" and then later says it's a real possibility in his video. Either way, this isn't a good attitude to have in the community. No one is "stupid". There are only people who have different interpretations of the facts. The only people who are "stupid" are the ones that are blatant making up stuff/ ignoring facts when it's convenient for them.
3. Mentions the Ridley debacle. Which is as bright as day evidence that the community takes anything that's ambiguous and runs in the opposite direction. For crying out loud the screen he showed says 'Other boss characters may appear'. That should've been Ridley's death then and there, but people wanted to hold onto false hope and hype. I know retrospect is 20/20, but common.
4. He says Sakurai hates K. Rool. Yeah, because Sakurai also hates Goku. He hated Dedede until sometime in in 2006 as Dedede wasn't in any Smash games until then. There's a lot of stuff that goes into designing and picking the characters for Smash. It's not as simple as "I hate this character. Time not include him". Frankly, that's a very immature way of looking at it, and I hope the community grows out of it. It's more like "This character doesn't work because XYZ". Why wasn't Llyod featured in the game over Pac-Man? Maybe it's because he had a popular game on the Gamecube and we are now on the Wii U. Why is he a costume now? To appease the fans, obviously.
5. Tourney mode complaining. I get this. There's a lot of features not in it that should be. Also, my personal theory is the whole 3 minute timeline for stocks -- it's for replays. It's an awful game design choice as it doesn't reflect how tourneys are played. But then again Smash isn't a fighter. It's classified as "action-based fighter" (or an "opponent based action game" depending on what translation you prefer)
I do like the actual video. @Kalimdori did a great job selecting footage that matched up with what he was talking about. His speech style is also effective. I do largely agree with his sentiments on the Mii Fighter Costumes, but making them actually play somewhat like their character would require a lot more work. Work that is going to be extremely limited.
Okay, now that I finished "responding" (see Etika, I responded and yet I'm still a news source. You can do both.) I'm going to put up the interview with the Dr. Mario fake leakers up. Give me ~30 minutes as I need coffee.
Fixed. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. It's getting more and more difficult to keep track of everything's that said about SG.Rekt? Rekt.
Also btw push, is this a typo or not?
http://www.reddit.com/r/smashbros/comments/3fiw7b/the_truth_and_misconceptions_about_clones/ctpady7
The official Zelda timeline introduced a third split for no reason whatsoever, and complicated things more than any fan did. And Anouma, the series director since 1999, has gone on record saying he does care about the timeline; it's Miyamoto that always comes in and screws things up. If the timeline doesn't make complete sense it's because of the tug of war between two very different design approaches, not because the creators don't care about the timeline at all.Keyword: possible
When you make a game franchise without caring about a timeline of events and fans start overthinking, the simplest answer is usually what happened with Zelda's timeline
Now to wait for the official Mario timeline
I would be tempted to get all 3.These three amiibos should be in the next wave in the Smash Bros. line.
Then, all we need to do is wait for Frieza to eventually come out and we'll be all set.
i would totally buy a cell amiibo easily best DBZ villianThese three amiibos should be in the next wave in the Smash Bros. line.
Then, all we need to do is wait for Frieza to eventually come out and we'll be all set.
Yes there are people who really want goku in smash.Natewantstobattle wanted him in for awhile and a couple DBZ tubers tried to get people to vote goku in the smash ballot.They want goku for the same reason we want a character he's character from there past who they want in there favorite fighting game they just dont understand why it hasn't/wont happened.Or your a bunch of kids who vote for whatever you like(lol vote for darth vader in smash).And yeah shrek is just a meme i never seen anyone really want himHonest question, do people actually want Goku or Shrek in Smash Bros.? Why?
I have a hard time understanding why people even want characters from non-Nintendo games that don't meet the Sakurai standard. It's a Nintendo crossover game. Sure, there are some wonderful games out there not made by them, but that's not really relevant to what Smash is.
No, but I would at least take a mii costume of Goku.Honest question, do people actually want Goku or Shrek in Smash Bros.? Why?
I have a hard time understanding why people even want characters from non-Nintendo games that don't meet the Sakurai standard. It's a Nintendo crossover game. Sure, there are some wonderful games out there not made by them, but that's not really relevant to what Smash is.
I can safely say most, if not all, of Shrek's votes are ~~ironic~~ ones.Honest question, do people actually want Goku or Shrek in Smash Bros.? Why?
I have a hard time understanding why people even want characters from non-Nintendo games that don't meet the Sakurai standard. It's a Nintendo crossover game. Sure, there are some wonderful games out there not made by them, but that's not really relevant to what Smash is.
In order to be eligible, third party characters must fill both of the following criteria:Does Goku actually violate a criteria set by Sakurai though?
TBH I kinda want Goku.Honest question, do people actually want Goku or Shrek in Smash Bros.? Why?
I have a hard time understanding why people even want characters from non-Nintendo games that don't meet the Sakurai standard. It's a Nintendo crossover game. Sure, there are some wonderful games out there not made by them, but that's not really relevant to what Smash is.
He's not primarily a video game character.Does Goku actually violate a criteria set by Sakurai though?
#Justice4GokuHonest question, do people actually want Goku or Shrek in Smash Bros.? Why?
I have a hard time understanding why people even want characters from non-Nintendo games that don't meet the Sakurai standard. It's a Nintendo crossover game. Sure, there are some wonderful games out there not made by them, but that's not really relevant to what Smash is.
I recall this being said during the Brawl pre-launch days. I forgot where though, several sites has likely reported on that though. He recently (as in Smash 4 pre-hype) said it again that anime/manga characters won't get in.Can I get a source on that?
I mean, I agree, as much I like Goku he's not a great fit, but I want to know exactly where Sakurai said that third-parties had to originate from a game.