Erureido
Smash Hero
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2014
- Messages
- 5,408
- NNID
- Erureido
- 3DS FC
- 5301-1552-4121
- Switch FC
- SW-4754-8756-2004
For the first point, the type of villain that crosses the line for me is one that commits major and despicable atrocities and yet they are completely forgiven by other characters closely tied with them in a really unrealistic way despite what the villain did (i.e. Biba Amatori from Kabaneri of the Iron Fortress committing genocides on two towns, yet the main female lead who shares a past and bond with him still forgives him and gives him a proper burial when he never deserved it, Berkut from FE: Echoes killing Rinea to sacrifice her to Duma for more power, yet the ghost of Rinea comes down and forgives him).So, I was reading some stuff on TV Tropes(of course I was), and it gave me an idea for a topic regarding Antagonists:
-What do you think makes an antagonist cross the line of no return?
-And on the other hand, what is an example of when an antagonist's actions/goals/morals more justifiable than the protagonist?
For the second point, anti-villains fit the bill for the kind of antagonist whose actions are more justified than the protagonist. They usually have some kind of backstory or characterization that explores why those evil actions they do have an ulterior good motive to them (i.e. N from Pokemon Black/White, Descole from the Layton series, Lyon from FE: Sacred Stones).
Like with redfeatherraven, I largely think it comes down to the situational context to what's going on that explains whether or not an antagonist crosses the line of no return or is more justified than a protagonist).