PLATINUM7
Star Platinum
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2013
- Messages
- 12,386
- NNID
- PLATINUM7
- 3DS FC
- 1246-8735-0293
- Switch FC
- 2465-5306-3806
I'm sure if I mentioned Dragon Warrior they'd have been even more confused. DQ didn't get a game released in the PAL region until VIII. So it's always been Dragon Quest here.But the company isn't "advertising". That's the point. It wasn't a strange choice, and most really looked at Cloud as like "he has no important Nintendo appearances, so he has no chance", which was not what Sakurai meant about 3rd party characters. A long time back, Source Gaming translated Sakurai's thoughts on 3rd party characters. A mistranslation said they required a Nintendo appearance. In reality, what was said was "Besides that, it might be something like a courtesy to include a character who has the experience of being on a Nintendo platform." which has an extremely different meaning.
The mistranslation actually affected Smash speculation way more than some silly advertisement clause, which didn't really exist much for 3rd parties. Most are added not for advertising in general, but because they like the idea of the options and it fits to use a character exclusive on a system. Soul Calibur for instance. Most 3rd parties are version exclusive. This was more to sell the SC game itself to the players of that system, not to advertise for the system's game that is being represented by a character.
Part of my point with the content too. Disney's even harder, so it would have less than the small amount we got with Cloud. No costumes is actually worse than some costumes. DQ isn't nearly as huge in the West, so that definitely played a role. Most likely, if a DQ character comes in, it'll be the base roster, not DLC. It also doesn't help most knew it as Dragon Warrior and it took a long time for Quest to get its name in the US. It was easy to place the games together, but it's not like it was advertised as the proper name overall. Many still think of Dragon Warrior Monsters in the West, not Dragon Quest Monsters, for the first game, specifically. And so on. A similar example is with Eggman and Robotnik. The US didn't know they were the same person, but Eggman actually said it in-game, which helped a lot. You could also look at Final Fantasy Legend, which is really a Mana-series title. Square-Enix has had a history of having odd name changes of the product itself, often to make it sell easier, respectively.
Also Final Fantasy Legend is a SaGa game. You're thinking of FF Adventure (annoyingly known as Mystic Quest in Europe, which left FF Mystic Quest to be renamed Mystic Quest Legend in Europe).
Last edited: