I was kinda aware of how well Geno would not do, base or DLC, I was just looking for a comparison. Still, how well could telling others about Geno, whether a possible Geno DLC pack or the remake, do you think could work out?
Here's the comparison: Geno won't have a tangible effect on base's sales, and he'll probably sell less than other third-parties, unless those third-parties are overall less recognizable to the audience who only buys characters they know, and fails to bring in enough fans from their series.
If you're looking for how well will he sell in base vs. how well will he sell as DLC, that's apples and oranges and doesn't really work like that. I think he's better off in base, but Square might not want that.
I don't understand the second part. How well would spreading the word about Geno work? Who's doing it? A fan or Nintendo? Nintendo doing it would work, because they have the means to communicate to the GP. They won't, though, unless it's in relation to SMRPG promotion. But that's only going until November. Fans have already accomplished a lot for a character like Geno. At this point reaching higher would just be diminishing returns since online awareness among fan circles isn't the problem anyway.
Not to argue or anything, but in my point of view, there are other non-lead characters in other franchises.
Oh my god, are we going to have the same debate again?
You can't just look at one quality another fighter shares with Geno and ignore the rest.
Please, please invoke the learning curve.
Since, as I said in the PM, that Geno's case is complicated, that he is a Mario character and a Square character, I don't think it would hurt to add him to the roster as a possible Mario character given his circumstances since he was from a Mario game.
I don't understand what you're trying to say here either... obviously Geno is a Mario character, and a Square character, but I recall in our previous discussion that you were saying how SMRPG should be viewed as separate from the normal Mario stuff, so this is a funny position to have now.
But being a Mario character puts him within a big series where multiple additions is plausible, but wherein his overall role is small, so it's a mixed bag.
Yes, he still has competition from both sides including in terms of Square, and he was technically from one game (with a cameo from the original Mario and Luigi), but to me, Geno being from a Mario game made by Square may, on the Mario side, lessen the non-lead factor, unless I am missing something, and with that, it is...well, still complicated for Geno.
Being third-party only compounds being disadvantaged from having a minor role. If he was first-party he'd probably have gotten in by now if only to appease the fanbase (probably back in Brawl when Sakurai tried), but when the company that owns Geno also owns Final Fantasy and Dragon Quest, and the spots are highly limited, not choosing Geno is pretty understandable.
Yeah he's distanced from the other Mario characters more than they are with each other insofar as he'd probably get in in a different round of inclusions, which is a silver lining. But he'd do better in that heat, considering now he's in the heat where he's up against Square characters and fan-favorite third-parties.
But I think time will tell if Geno's popularity and how he would do as a DLC character will change. Not to dismiss how he would do NOW, as now is the same kind of situation, you know, but with the remake, depending on how many people play it AND like Geno, that has a better chance to change things from now and the next Smash Bros., and I think there is plenty of time for that change to occur before next Smash.
Well, it will increase his popularity, but that's not the problem. There's only so much it can increase his general recognition given what the game is and his role in it. Past it making him active again, it holds the most promise in potentially leading to sequels. But until that happens, it's not relevant.
We'll just have to see if not being dormant is enough to let his popularity overtake his shortcomings. He's got a good shot.
But listen, if we're just going to go in circles, I'm not really interested in continuing. You went from your original points to a different stance by the end of the last debate, and now the original points are just getting cycled back in.
So I'm not really keen to do this on loop.