- Joined
- Aug 7, 2012
- Messages
- 9,582
- Location
- Buffalo, New York
- NNID
- ScoliosisxJones
- 3DS FC
- 1762-3194-1826
As I mentioned the other day with sword users, I think the main issue is that swords are absolutely the primary "fantasy weapon" that most gaming protagonists, especially within Nintendo, use. It's a simple fact. Even outside of Nintendo, most main protagonists use swords as their main weapon, and I would argue it's mainly because it's a weapon that fits plenty of different styles of gameplay.
Well, that or bare fists.
But just like there are many different ways to fight in hand to hand combat, there are many ways to handle different swords. Chances are decently high (granted, I don't see it happening whatsoever) that we DON'T get another Fire Emblem character. Three examples, whether they're in Smash or not, being Dnate, 2B, and even Geralt of ****ing Rivia all use swords, but none of them would play remotely like any of the Fire Emblem characters we have.
There hasn't been a main character (besides the House Leaders, but at the end of the day I don't think they were expected to be picked over main protag Byleth) in Fire Emblem that has used a weapon other than a sword. Off the top of my head I can think of Ephraim and Hector, but neither of those characters is even close to actually fitting the criteria of "a character from a recent release" that Corrin and Byleth.
Mind you, both are sword users but they play far different from every other sword fighter. Corrin effectively, functionally, uses a lance-like weapon for plenty of attacks. As I said the other day, you can't play Link like Marth. You can't play Ike like Shulk. You can't even play Young Link like Toon Link. It isn't the weapon that matters, it's the way the character functions within the confines of Super Smash Bros.
Like, they've literally made two versions of the same dude play entirely differently. I main Mario and love Uair ladders, but I don't play Doc because I can't do that with him. Yes, Smash represents plenty of games and characters. But it's a video game that allows for plenty of different functioning playstyles, and we can't just pretend that doesn't matter.
Well, that or bare fists.
But just like there are many different ways to fight in hand to hand combat, there are many ways to handle different swords. Chances are decently high (granted, I don't see it happening whatsoever) that we DON'T get another Fire Emblem character. Three examples, whether they're in Smash or not, being Dnate, 2B, and even Geralt of ****ing Rivia all use swords, but none of them would play remotely like any of the Fire Emblem characters we have.
There hasn't been a main character (besides the House Leaders, but at the end of the day I don't think they were expected to be picked over main protag Byleth) in Fire Emblem that has used a weapon other than a sword. Off the top of my head I can think of Ephraim and Hector, but neither of those characters is even close to actually fitting the criteria of "a character from a recent release" that Corrin and Byleth.
Mind you, both are sword users but they play far different from every other sword fighter. Corrin effectively, functionally, uses a lance-like weapon for plenty of attacks. As I said the other day, you can't play Link like Marth. You can't play Ike like Shulk. You can't even play Young Link like Toon Link. It isn't the weapon that matters, it's the way the character functions within the confines of Super Smash Bros.
Like, they've literally made two versions of the same dude play entirely differently. I main Mario and love Uair ladders, but I don't play Doc because I can't do that with him. Yes, Smash represents plenty of games and characters. But it's a video game that allows for plenty of different functioning playstyles, and we can't just pretend that doesn't matter.