PeridotGX
Smash Hero
why do we even have these FE arguments? Nobody's mind will be changed, and it's the exact same points that were said in the last argument and will be said again in the next.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Really? Over clones that don't take much effort to program in? It's either them or nothing, and I don't see the harm with more content.Yeeaah, I'm starting to think the whole 'Everyone is here' thing was a mistake.
I agree, we should have gotten rid of all of your mainsYeeaah, I'm starting to think the whole 'Everyone is here' thing was a mistake.
Save that development time, seriously. I'd rather have no clones at all.Really? Over clones that don't take much effort to program in? It's either them or nothing, and I don't see the harm with more content.
Well, I've mained Trainer and I'd still be happy cutting all three of those characters, so joke's on you.I agree, we should have gotten rid of all of your mains
The amount of development time a clone character takes wouldn't be enough to add more unique content in its place. Come on now, lmao.Save that development time, seriously. I'd rather have no clones at all.
Development time for what? More clones?Save that development time, seriously. I'd rather have no clones at all.
I dunno, I personally don't think characters are the only thing that can represent a series. Smash has a ton of stuff in it and all kinds of fan service when you experience all it has to offer. Heck, part of what makes WoL so cool is the attention to detail on all the references it makes and how it cleverly uses things like the Mii Costumes and ATs in the battles. It's all really cool stuff. Classic Mode is also really great for this, especially with the bosses adding even further representation for different series. I mean, I play with items off too, but I sometimes I like to play with 'em on so I can appreciate all the hard work that went into 'em. Smash can be enjoyed in many different ways, and that's part of what makes it awesome.Doesn't really make Zelda's representation better though, a lot of series have multiple ATs. It's the standard.
We have people who mock Dark Pit for having a palette swap design. The fact that he is one should've been enough proof that he didn't take anyone else's spot except...Blood Falcon I guess?The amount of development time a clone character takes wouldn't be enough to add more unique content in its place. Come on now, lmao.
Considering all the memes about Zelda's ass I saw on twitter last week I don't think people would mindImagine the salt if Zelda gets a BotW2 character and it's just BotW Zelda.
While she wouldn't be my preferred LoZ choice (that'd be Daruk), I'd honestly be okay with it. She's my favorite iteration of Zelda design-wise.Imagine the salt if Zelda gets a BotW2 character and it's just BotW Zelda.
I'd like to believe differently, but it might be the case that Sakurai doesn't include a non-triforce Zelda character until the fans really make a ruckus about it. Which is trickier than the likes of K. Rool or something, because opinion is split across a number of worthwhile candidates.Given how nobody really complains about Sheik, I think the whole one-off argument isn't the issue. The biggest issue is they keep remaking the Links and Zeldas for each Smash game and think that's enough for modern Zelda reps.
It's not like if we didn't get YL back we would've got some new Zelda character.Yeeaah, I'm starting to think the whole 'Everyone is here' thing was a mistake.
Dude your endgoal isn't even consistent anymore. You're wanting representation and unique characters, and your plan for that is cutting representation and unique characters. At this point it sounds like, "The only good choices are my choices."Well, I've mained Trainer and I'd still be happy cutting all three of those characters, so joke's on you.
What about Deku Link?Imagine the salt if Zelda gets a BotW2 character and it's just BotW Zelda.
Oh no, I'm well aware Lucina, Dr. Mario and Dark Pit were added late because they were intended to just be Alts.... I just wish they'd stayed Alts.We have people who mock Dark Pit for having a palette swap design. The fact that he is one should've been enough proof that he didn't take anyone else's spot except...Blood Falcon I guess?
I will be surprised as hell if I see people who would actually main and would deeply miss main is harsh. Deeply miss still stands.I agree, we should have gotten rid of all of your mains
Like, why does it matter, though? They were gonna be in regardless, so why would them being in a character's costume options instead make it better? Not to be rude here, but I'm kind of confused what your point is?Oh no, I'm well aware Lucina, Dr. Mario and Dark Pit were added late because they were intended to just be Alts.... I just wish they'd stayed Alts.
What? I'd be okay cutting Trainer in favour of someone from a different gen because Gen 1's over done. I spelled that out pages ago.Dude your endgoal isn't even consistent anymore. You're wanting representation and unique characters, and your goal for that is cutting representation and unique characters. At this point it sounds like, "The only good choices are my choices."
If they've got such a minuscule difference between them, why bother? DP was literally only separate from Pit to have a different Final Smash. Hell, I'm fairly certain all of DP's moves were Customs for Pit. What's the point? Like adding Lucas when Ness' Customs already do everything Lucus does. It's just... why?Like, why does it matter, though? They were gonna be in regardless, so why would them being in a character's costume options instead make it better? Not to be rude here, but I'm kind of confused what your point is?
Isn't it better that we got both? We not only got Pokemon Trainer but a new gen Pokemon like Incineroar. This appeals to both crowds--those who missed Pokemon Trainer's gimmick and those who enjoyed Gen 7.What? I'd be okay cutting Trainer in favour of someone from a different gen because Gen 1's over done. I spelled that out pages ago.
I like the Doc and would be bummed to see him go.I will be surprised as hell if I see people who would actually main and would deeply miss main is harsh. Deeply miss still stands.
Oh, I do appreciate the ones that do have fanserivce put into them. Which is stuff like Guile being campy, Kawasaki referencing Kirby's original FS or Sukapon being crudley animated like its original game, but not Isaac only using puzzle-solving Psynergy, Oshawott not using its Scalchop, or Starfy being the Goldeen of ATs.I like to play with 'em on so I can appreciate all the hard work that went into 'em
I've always thought it was a mistake sincce day one.Yeeaah, I'm starting to think the whole 'Everyone is here' thing was a mistake.
Bosses are one off things only fightable by only their respective characters. While I don't particularly care about Everyone is Here, the tradeoff being bosses most peopld stopped caring about in less than a week would be disappointing as hell.I've always thought it was a mistake sincce day one.
I prefer less content but better, quality over quantity.
For example, less characters but each one with an exclusive bossfight in classic mode, and all of them have an unique moveset, not even semiclones.
Ok but that meant characters I didn't like got in, how dare Sakurai not cater towards me, we should just get rid of all the characters I don't like, so 60 characters are just gone nowI love Everyone Is Here. I got all kinds of cool characters to play as. I missed Pichu a ton. Dr. Mario is one of my favorite clones and he has his own brand of uniqueness that Mario won't have because of F.L.U.D.D. alone. Besides that, he has different stats that mesh far better with me than regular Mario does, regardless of the Mario Tornado(if it were there instead).
ahemanyway uh... let's change the topic
Do you think FPV2 will open with a BIG HEAVY HITTER like Crash or Master Chief, a fan fave pick , or a curveball?
The tiny amount of work they put into the echoes just makes them slightly more like their original version. Making them alts does literally nothing but make them less faithful.Oh no, I'm well aware Lucina, Dr. Mario and Dark Pit were added late because they were intended to just be Alts.... I just wish they'd stayed Alts.
Dr. Mario is great. Just wished he had used some custom special moves like the Ol' One two, Mega Capsule and Shocking cape just to differentiate him more from regular Mario.I will be surprised as hell if I see people who would actually main and would deeply miss main is harsh. Deeply miss still stands.
Depends when FP6 comes.anyway uh... let's change the topic
Do you think FPV2 will open with a BIG HEAVY HITTER like Crash or Master Chief, a fan fave pick , or a curveball?
I agree representation isn't just found through playability, but it's not like there are 10 Zelda ATs to offset the characters. There are a normal amount for a series like that, which doesn't really move the needle in terms of playability out of the deficit by overcompensating in another category.I dunno, I personally don't think characters are the only thing that can represent a series. Smash has a ton of stuff in it and all kinds of fan service when you experience all it has to offer. Heck, part of what makes WoL so cool is the attention to detail on all the references it makes and how it cleverly uses things like the Mii Costumes and ATs in the battles. It's all really cool stuff. Classic Mode is also really great for this, especially with the bosses adding even further representation for different series. I mean, I play with items off too, but I sometimes I like to play with 'em on so I can appreciate all the hard work that went into 'em. Smash can be enjoyed in many different ways, and that's part of what makes it awesome.
...Plus, I'm not gonna lie, Smash with items can be just as sick as No Items Smash. The items and stages in this game can just make the craziest stuff happen, and when you're just in it for a good time, it's fantastic.
I'd prefer a reference to the viruses thrown in there somewhere.Dr. Mario is great. Just wished he had used some custom special moves like the Ol' One two, Mega Capsule and Shocking cape just to differentiate him more from regular Mario.
It's the idea that "If that character wasn't in, mine would be instead".I think someone said this before but it's really ironic that some people come to a thread named Newcomer Speculation thread for talking about how much they want character cuts.
As someone who makes it his first priority to listen to the music over anything else in Smash when a new character gets released, who loves playing with items on all the different wacky stages, and thinks spirit battles are unironically the best addition to single player Smash in years, characters are still the most important thing by a mile.I dunno, I personally don't think characters are the only thing that an represent a series. Smash has a ton of stuff in it and all kinds of fan service when you experience all it has to offer. Heck, part of what makes WoL so cool is the attention to detail on all the references it makes and how it cleverly uses things like the Mii Costumes and ATs in the battles. It's all really cool stuff. Classic Mode is also really great for this, especially with the bosses adding even further representation for different series. I mean, I play with items off too, but I sometimes I like to play with 'em on so I can appreciate all the hard work that went into 'em. Smash can be enjoyed in many different ways, and that's part of what makes it awesome.
...Plus, I'm not gonna lie, Smash with items can be just as sick as No Items Smash. The items and stages in this game can just make the craziest stuff happen, and when you're just in it for a good time, it's fantastic.
The only thing I want battle-wise is a story mode. Literally just story mode. WOL sucked.I've always thought it was a mistake sincce day one.
I prefer less content but better, quality over quantity.
For example, less characters but each one with an exclusive bossfight in classic mode, and all of them have an unique moveset, not even semiclones.
I think most people disagree, because that "mistake" raked in millions of dollars from consumers. Maximillian Dood said it best. "Characters sell games," which is why Ultimate is the ultimate Smash Bros game. It's roster is massive, conveys nostalgia for older Smash games, and brings in a ton of new IPs along with it.I've always thought it was a mistake sincce day one.
I prefer less content but better, quality over quantity.
For example, less characters but each one with an exclusive bossfight in classic mode, and all of them have an unique moveset, not even semiclones.
One thing to keep in mind that the most likely characters not to come back are clones, had everyone not been here. Not bringing back low-effort fighters doesn't necessarily speed up development time for alternate content, unless you have certain clone ideas that didn't make it in."Everyone is here!" wasn't done that we would've somehow gotten a bunch of other content or that things would be radically and totally different
Because we never learn.View attachment 264224
why do we even have these FE arguments? Nobody's mind will be changed, and it's the exact same points that were said in the last argument and will be said again in the next.
You know you love it, masochist.Because we never learn.
And even if we do, there's always going to be someone new who brings it up again because they have an opiniontm and that opinion has to be correct, leading them to assert that opinion as fact despite multiple people debunking them. This stirs up both sides, thus leading to that topic being brought up again. And the cycle continues.
We're stuck like this for another two years.