Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It absolutely doesn't, but points for trying.
:shrug: Don't care. You can lead a horse to water and all that.
What, you mean with those posts where you sarcastically parroted common talking points that had absolutely nothing to do with what I was saying? Yeah, granted, I guess they do that at gameFAQs.
I mean, even if you did not word it that way, you chose the most hostile and demeaning way possible to respond. Maybe don't tell people their taste is garbage? There's really no way to take that other than as a personal insult. Just food for thought.
I knew precisely what I was saying and I stand by it. That's just how I am. Ain't I a stinker.I mean, even if you did not word it that way, you chose the most hostile and demeaning way possible to respond. Maybe don't tell people their taste is garbage? There's really no way to take that other than as a personal insult. Just food for thought.
Sure Ultimate is just a better version of Super Smash Bros. Ultimate, but Brawl has a ton of stuff to differentiate itself from the other games in terms of core gameplay. The reason why nobody plays it anymore is because all of the differences make the game much less fun to most people. The game's slow, you can trip randomly, some of the only advanced tech exclusive to Brawl is an "I win" button, and the ledges are so dumb. Seriously, try to recover with Wolf in Ultimate, then in Brawl. You will miss the ledge.
Granted, but like, there some areas in the older games where they are just OBJECTIVELY obsolete, precisely like that ledge thing you mentioned. People can revisit them for nostalgia but will they ever take it as seriously as a modern entry in the series? Probably not, and this is because there's no reason to go back to them outside of nostalgia. Compared to SF3 and the other SF games, people are still playing those games en masse, there's a huge competitive community for them and tournaments with huge turnouts, even as new games in the series have come out. This is because 3rd Strike wasn't made objectively obsolete by the existence of 4 and 5, it stood the test of time and carved out a niche for itself, which is more than I can say for Brawl. In fact the other day I played Brawl with family and they were talking about how awful and floaty it felt and how they do not miss that game. Anecdotal, sure, but I think it kind of represents why people aren't going back to Brawl now that Ultimate's out.
And I don't mean to come off as insulting, but none of your games will ever become more successful than the series you think needs to "objectively" reboot. Reevaluate your position a bit.
Welcome to the internet. People ain't gonna stop until they feel like they "won" an argument of subjective opinions because their opinion is right and your opinion is wrong.
My most wanted is a Fire Emblem character
My most wanted is from an RPG Maker walking simulator from 2004.
That's... fine? I'm not competing with Smash. Hell, even if I had a AAA multimillion dollar budget, I still wouldn't be competing with Smash. That's not really the goal. If you think people get into gamedev to become millionaires, you are sadly mistaken.
I'd less so say it's about the opinion being unpopular as it is the ****ty attitude.
Madotsuki takes the plunge!
Stage could be a whole amalgamation of stuff. But if they went with just one area, the White Desert would be the way to go.
I just want Quinty to come back.
Mmm, no Street Fighter V's base gameplay had always been a broken pile of misinterpreted game mechanics. The fundamental mechanics within Street Fighter V are broken, they're boring, comboing usually dumbs down to 1, 2, special move, the footsies game it pushes is fundamentally uninspired and boring. This is coming off of Street Fighter IV's overdeveloped defensive game that made playing against certain characters a waiting game and fighting an opponent who did nothing but Poke to Hado for the entire match, this in turn inspired Capcom to go for more offensive characters from then on but this caused the game to become even more broken. Yun and Yang were absolutley overpowered and then after the release of Evil Ryu and Oni the game became even more one sided to those 4 characters. This would be fine if the crouching defense gameplay from the base game was still withheld but it's not. If you play that game against these new characters you lose. Plain and simple. Ultra Street Fighter IV even being the most balanced version of the game is still fundamentally broken. Street Fighter III? Vanilla and 2nd Impact are broken to an absolute infamy and only when 3rd strike happened did people finally realize the beauty of the game. II? Well it's II. And Super Turbo II will always be the GOAT even after Ultra II because it built fighting games in general.
You literally JUST praised ****ing Street Fighter, a game infamous for it's over saturation of Shodo characters and their redundancy to each other...
Schnee117
that you were a game dev so you saying this paints the picture that either you're a student who hasn't quite grasped the full picture or are purposefully denying the minutiae of development so that you can improve your point. But you saying the above means that you didn't take into account that every character that missed Smash 4 got a brand new model and animations. That alone is... what 7 characters that were essentially new. Not to mention the new characters that were added Inkling, Ridley, Simon, K. Rool, Isabelle, and Inceneroar. Not to mention characters like Zelda and Link who were completely redone. So what that's basically 15 brand new characters just from what I listed. Not to mention Echo fighters who mostly have the same animations as certain other characters but whose models had to be made from the ground up. And finally not to mention that every single character in the game was in one way or another touched up and reanimated to better differentiate them from the rest of the cast and balance then on top of that. On top of 100 stages, technically 300, at base. So please, gamedev, explain how that is "bare minimum" I'm genuinely curious.So using your flawed mindset, because your work isn't notable, your opinion on game design is objectively inferior to Sakurai's and his teams because he's doing something more successfully than whatever you're pitching.
I used to be against more FE, but I really don't care about "reps" anymore.
There's a lot to unpack here, and a lot of it is wrong. I don't even know where to begin with your word salad of subjective complaints about 5. So if it's all the same to you I'll take this to DMs.Mmm, no Street Fighter V's base gameplay had always been a broken pile of misinterpreted game mechanics. The fundamental mechanics within Street Fighter V are broken, they're boring, comboing usually dumbs down to 1, 2, special move, the footsies game it pushes is fundamentally uninspired and boring. This is coming off of Street Fighter IV's overdeveloped defensive game that made playing against certain characters a waiting game and fighting an opponent who did nothing but Poke to Hado for the entire match, this in turn inspired Capcom to go for more offensive characters from then on but this caused the game to become even more broken. Yun and Yang were absolutley overpowered and then after the release of Evil Ryu and Oni the game became even more one sided to those 4 characters. This would be fine if the crouching defense gameplay from the base game was still withheld but it's not. If you play that game against these new characters you lose. Plain and simple. Ultra Street Fighter IV even being the most balanced version of the game is still fundamentally broken. Street Fighter III? Vanilla and 2nd Impact are broken to an absolute infamy and only when 3rd strike happened did people finally realize the beauty of the game. II? Well it's II. And Super Turbo II will always be the GOAT even after Ultra II because it built fighting games in general.
You literally JUST praised ****ing Street Fighter, a game infamous for it's over saturation of Shodo characters and their redundancy to each other...
You also told
Judging from my past interactions with you, if you think that criticism only applies to me you really need a long period of self reflection.
:shrug: Tell Schnee this, not me, I'm not the one who brought up "armchair gamedev". I was simply giving her **** in kind for what she gave me. I don't really consider myself "above" anyone for this.
That is nice!
do the 91 total slots line up with the current WoL placeholders?
I think I've seen something with her once. She's a mage, right? I'd love to see more magic users in Smash! Her design also looks super cool.
You take the base game number (75 with random) and you add the WoL placeholder entries (16), you do indeed get 91.
Ok, You say you want smash to be different? Literally all of the games have something that adds on and changes the game.
Well...Not every game in a long running series is going to be immortal like Super Smash Bros. Melee, Mario Kart Wii, Portal, or Street Fighter 3: Third Strike. Pokémon Red/Blue/Green/Yellow are glitchy messes, most people look at Street Fighter and wonder how the series got off the ground, and Super Smash Bros. Brawl will (hopefully) be forever deemed as the worst one.
Hot take: Even if the characters from Super Smash Bros. and Super Smash Bros. Melee were redesigned from the ground up most of them would still be remarkably similar to how they are now. They'd just have a few more bells and whistles.
That's not really much, like I said, 64 to Melee was the last significant evolution with the addition of spot dodges and side Bs. The rest of those have been way less significant, I mean you considered "tripping" and "floaty gameplay" to be game changers, those aren't really game changers so much as they are annoyances that make the game worse. And perfect shields were in Smash 4.
Yep, she is a mage, also the only main character that doesn't use actual weapons, and because of this, the only one is actually associated with Magic instead of a particular weapon type.
you mean Decapre right?
Yeah. Like Will for example will refuse to believe Poopyhead is a terrible name for my Dragon Quest heroes no matter what I sayFirst mistake is assuming you can change peoples' minds on the internet.Even if they're wrong.
That sounds so cool! Robin never satisfied my desire for a magic user fully, so Micaiah sounds like just the kinda character I'd love.
I never said it wasn't terrible, I just want you to use it.
But you wont change your mind, which was my point.
