It didn't strike me to do so at the time. I figured I could respond to it as it became more prominent, i.e. Shotty actually posts.
The only reason I have for Kary leaning scum is his attempt to start a wagon so early. It seems as though he's already trying to move attention to someone other than him and get the town on his side. Although as I write this post, I realise it's not really any kind of scumtell. But meh. My suspicion remains.
That makes sense.
Ah ok, alright I like you. I thought you might have been sheeping opinion, good stuff. I also dislike Lemon because of him not really commenting on others until asked. He is also giving 'probaly' answers to some of his actions, which isn't very convincing.
What is your opinion on Zen?
@Ran: Well, if I haven't commented on Zen or VitaminC yet it's probably because it seems to me to be too early in the game to be commenting on other people just yet. But since you asked, here we go.
Zen- well, I like him so far. He apparently has a read on you already, hence his vote for you- that or it's some sort of gambit to put you under pressure, which I also like. I think he answered my questions well, and has a pretty similar viewpoint to mine which is JUSTICE!!!
Obviously my view of him may change depending on the reasoning for your vote which he promised.
VitaminC- well, he seems ok to me. Apparently you called him on not putting a random vote out, and he brushed that off ok. We seem to be on the same page about the Shottymaster waggon, and he's given a read of me which I think shows the sort of involvement that I want to get behind.
I haven't asked either of them to join me in voting Shottymaster, but then again I asked you individually as a test to see how you'd react. I don't plan on asking them at this time as they've their own waggon now, much as I'd like to surprise Shotty with five or so votes against him when he logs on.
I've a question for you, Ran- do you think voting for someone 'randomly' at the start of the game is a bad thing?
Why did it seem to early to comment on players to you? Why do you say 'probably'? Shouldn't you know
exactly why you did something or not?
I feel your read on zen is a bit forced. I don't have a read on Zen yet, because I haven't seen what he has been trying to do. I don't see any reason to have a town read on him yet, and then you seem to be giving more reasons just to add on to your town read on Zen. I don't like that.
Like I have said, I feel you are trying to force a read on Zen without having enough reason to, and I don't see why you haven't asked Vitamin/Zen to join you on the wagon. This is suspicious to me because it feels you are trying to seem like you are testing me but forgot to test them as well, which you should be looking at everyone, and not just one person. I also don't like you giving 'probably' as an answer to a reason for your actions. You should know why you have done something. It just seems like you are trying to cover up for your actions with 'well maybe it could have gone this way' etc etc.
Vote: Lemon
That doesn't answer my question. Why didn't you ask them to join the wagon?
What exactly prompted you to test me and only me?
---
Yes it can be. Shows that you want to hide the reason for voting a person in RVS. It also hides your intent in choosing that person. If someone was suspicious of you voting that person randomly, you could just say "Sorry, it wasn't me, it was the randomizer". How about you?
