Sorry for not being active, guys! A game just finished up, and I got caught in the middle of the "ask questions of everybody and laugh at how wrong everyone was" phase after the game. Life also happened, so yeah.
Also something else happened related to that game that I had to clear up, but whatever. I'm not gonna go into it.
Which vote are you referring to?
My vote. Sorry for not making that clear.
What exactly did you get out of it? How did that effect your read on her?
I wanted to see just how defensive she got, and I saw it. I also wanted to see her actual reasoning for the vote, and since I figured that a vote might push it out of her more quickly, I also wanted to see how her reasoning held up when she wasn't giving it as simply reasons but as defence, and I got what I wanted.
I'm going more for a null read now, but I'll keep the vote there until I see someone worse. She's not even close to a lynch, I believe, so one vote won't hurt for now.
Her vote on Garg wasn't solely based on the fact that he was posting fluff. Even if it was, her original suspicion came from a point in the game where literally no one was talking except Garg, SW and myself. I asked her to give reasoning for her Garg suspicion at that early stage and its a stretch to say that she could have justified her vote on him for any other reason than the one she gave.
Yeah yeah, I just thought that it was a bit of a stretch to vote for someone over jokes, but I see where she's coming from now, I guess. I still think she was over analyzing a bit if she wasn't just panicking and trying to find a reason (which I don't think she did).
Dislike. The only instance that has caught your eye thus far is SW's vote on garg? Gimme your read on Phoenix and Panta.
Sorry, sorry. Life and another game, as stated earlier in this post, caught up with me. I'll get back to you on this question when I read up more.
First of all he voted you for some pretty dumb reasoning, which I explained in my 223. However, what bothers me more is what you brought up in the above quote. Instead of defending his position against the points I did bring up, he immediately piggybacked on Phoenix saying that he was pressure voting and tried to get out of being held responsible for those accusations. He was more in favor of saying "my vote was only for pressure and I got what I needed out of it" instead of taking my 223 and saying "this is why your reasoning is wrong/I realize why I'm wrong now after your response." In fact, he didn't even mention my post or my vote on him at all, he just chose to shrug off the push once he realized it wasn't going to go anywhere (with me not supporting it).
Because he wasn't prepared to defend his position, the initial push from him seems very disingenuous. Remember when I said that town have to scumhunt but scum only have to give the illusion that they are scumhunting? Well that looks like textbook fake scumhunting.
Wait wait wait, did you make points against me inbetween my posts? I honestly missed it, if you did; I apologize.
I'm not sure if it's just a dumb mistake, a real scum tell... Overall though, I don't like how he didn't let up the pressure vote, and how he didn't imply a pressure vote at all... Waffly. Trying to pull attention away from himself while at the same time retaining the same stance. I don't like that. What's the vote count on Werekill at the moment?
Eh? I was trying to pull attention away from myself? I thought that the whole point of that post was to drag attention away from the SW discussion, not from me. But whatever.
And I didn't take the vote away because:
However, as phoenix has said here, basing a vote on the fact that someone makes a bunch of silly jokes on is a bit shaky. By that logic, my Scamp vote should make me scummy as well, so my vote is staying until I find someone scummier than her.
Not that she's that scummy; there's just no one else that I can really think of.
Note that last line there.