Werekill I've seen you do the same thing.
I apologize if I have done it in the past. I was just noticing it, that's all.
@werekill. Why would you change your vote so quickly just because of Zen's argument? I think a few of us have been making that same argument, but you didn't acknowledge that. As I recall, you were adamant to remove Pheonix as he wasn't posting.
Making what argument? I'm sorry that potentially removing a scummy person makes me switch wagons; I had already stated before that the only reason why I wasn't pushing for anyone else was because I didn't think a wagon switch was really possible.
Anyway, on to 338!
Alright, here we go. I’ve laid it all out for you. Sorry for the length of this, but it was the easiest way.
Okay, well, first of all, before I had voted for Garg, Kuzi had asked for whom I would vote for if I had the chance. This is my post:
I guess I understand where you’re coming from with the idea that I didn’t give enough support with my Garg suspicion early on, but he was just the first, and only person for a while, that seemed like scum to me.
With my #201 post, I had finally decided to vote for the person I had been having suspicion of, and he had been the only one to really give me mafia reads. I mean, it’s early on. What other reasons can a person really have for voting except for a feeling that early? But, I digress.
We're already past this, so I don't see a reason to respond to this.
I came back to this at #206 and #207
This was for who was town, which you seemed to not get.
And we have already agreed that you had worded it badly. Next!
Now, where in the world did you get the idea to pressure-vote me? Because, from your post, it seemed like you had other reasons to want to vote me, so why would you go back and change your reasons later instead of sticking with them?
I consider a pressure vote to be a vote on a person that uses mostly solid reasons with some level of shakiness in order to see what response you get from the person in question. Imo, if you say that it's a pressure vote at the time, it weakens the ability to pressure, so this might be why you think here that I changed my reasons.
Now, go back and read my #210 post, please.
#211, I come back to what I have said over and over again, yet you continue to bring up crap.
I’m not sure what you want to take from this line from Kuzi, but I figured I should let you look at this as well.
You have to remember that I still didn't believe that you had sufficient reasons at the time for the vote. However, we're already past this now, so I'll move on.
Here, I have to thank Kuzi for saying what I apparently had issues with trying to find the correct words to say:
And, once again, I believed that you hadn't really stated your reasons, except in a vague way. Stating reasons for waiting to vote is not the same as stating reasons FOR the vote. But, once again, we're past this, so I'll move on.
Now, what were you’re reasons for thinking it was an OMGUS vote? Because, you stated it but never went back to it, even after Kuzi, me, and even Garg commented on it.
Honestly, the OMGUS was a shot in the dark. Garg had voted for you out of nowhere, so I thought that you might have been OMGUS'ing him. However, I realized that this was wrong, so I never went back to it.
And this is where our suspicion with you started:
I understand this one was posted by phoenix, but, immediately after, you followed up with this, claiming to change from being suspicious at my so-called OMGUS vote:
The conversation that cleared up the joke thing was between Garg and me, starting mostly at either #144 or #203 and #206, all of which was before you made your vote on me known.
I, personally, did not believe that it had cleared up the joke thing, but I wasn't referring to you voting for the action of joking itself. I didn't like your reasoning of "he's hoping that people pass over him because of his jokes." That's what I meant by voting for him because of jokes; I didn't think of it as sufficient reasoning to think that someone's scummy because it seemed really reachy to me.
On a side note...
JUSTICE.
Here, you didn’t really answer this part of Kuzi’s post and I want you to now.
I mean, there’s nothing else on this entire thread that might be taken as scummy? Really?
You have to remember that I was pretty busy around that point, and I honestly just skimmed the thread a bit. After seeing your vote I went back and read more of your stuff, but that's about it.
Besides, not many people had been active around then, so it was difficult to get clear reads.
Now, in your #326 post, you commented on my explanation of wanting to vote Garg and say that nowhere else did I explain the Garg vote. I thought I had made it clear but I must not have. I admit my wrongdoing on that part. But, I did explain my reasons eventually, and even slightly beforehand.
Yeah, we've gone over this already, so ignoring! At least we both admit that we were each wrong in some little ways.
There we go! Satisfied in some ways, SW?