Rosalina suporter
Smash Ace
Well i guess this and the 3ds games are his games so that means he will be in smash 4?Sakurai mentioned that if Takamaru would get a new game, he would put him into SSB4.
![](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51Xfx2Y2yIL.jpg)
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Well i guess this and the 3ds games are his games so that means he will be in smash 4?Sakurai mentioned that if Takamaru would get a new game, he would put him into SSB4.
Little Mac is not a retro character anymore.Little Mac & Takamaru are the only retro characters I expect to see.
Without the paintbrush he's more boring than Toad.I find that to be quite absurd. After all, Bowser Jr. operates differently from his father; he's faster, but less powerful.
I really don't see how you CANNOT see the logic that a 2008 game (which had it's roster decided in 2005!) would somehow add a character from a 2011 game (Impa: Skyward Sword edition, not fat, very slim, and smexy as ****KKNo. There was only Toon Sheik. Stop deluding yourself. Tetra was NEVER in the data. If she was, it would explicitly say TETRA. It says Toon Sheik.
And you're actually quite wrong on all accounts.
1) Sakurai wanted Toon Sheik in before Impa. The latter of which he clearly gives no crap about.
2) Toon Sheik has to be a form of Zelda, as Sheik will always be Zelda. Impa is not Toon Sheik. Stop twisting facts because you cannot accept that Impa is not important to Smash and probably won't be at this point.(you'd think she'd be mentioned a LOT more)
3) Sakurai has yet to show caring about "ooh, character got more interesting". Impa's one and only other notable appearance(besides OOT) isn't going to help much. OOT was her best chance, and Sheik was more important. At best, Sakurai may notice her a little, but it really won't ultimate "get her in". It may help at best... at being a Trophy for once. You severely overestimate her already pathetic chances on the realistic scale.
Not really.Bowser Jr. could throw shells and stuff. Breate fire balls instead of fire breath, do a shell spike attack with Down B... I don't really think he should use that paint brush at all. Maybe for his side B?
Anyway: Toad is cooler.![]()
I think Toad looks a lot better than Jr. in terms of design (at least he isn't a mini version of an already pre-existing character).how do you figure? he's more of a fighter, less of an underling, and even looks the part better than toad.
I love Toad too.I think Toad looks a lot better than Jr. in terms of design (at least he isn't a mini version of an already pre-existing character).
Of course, that is my own opinion to hold.![]()
Obviously you haven't played many Nintendo games beyond those franchises.[COLLAPSE="I can list a few quality Nintendo IP's without playable characters in smash:"]Golden Sun: The best traditional RPG series on any Nintendo handheld console, along with Pokémon.And only two of the three upgradable franchises are allowed to have an extra character. I personally would rather see minimal new franchises, and the expansion of existing ones. PERSONALLY, I don't care for almost any franchises that haven't been added. (Exceptions of course would be Punch Out!!, Xenoblade, and TLS)
Isn't Smash Nintendo All-Stars?
Well.... Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale has All-Star written on the title yet, they still are gonna have 3rd party content but..... The 3rd party character might become the main spotlight instead of the nintendo cast. Look what happened to Snake. Lots of people pay attention to him instead of the cast of nintendo (And also Sonic).
Uh.... no. Sakurai never said that. Heck, the game was only meant for original characters initially. But the series evolved, featured 12 Nintendo characters (because those were the easiest to secure), and then became a series that featured more Nintendo-owned characters and then 2 party characters. I'm not saying litter the series in only 3rd party characters, but add a few "big ones" that have been on Nintendo consoles.In fact, this game was only meant for nintendo and nintendo only. Sakurai is just kind enough to let only like a few 3rd parties in the game.
When Sonic got in, every knew. Mega Man would be the next step down from that. While not everyone would know, it certainly would be news or at least back page news internationally. Also, that may sell some copies to casual gamers. Plus, it helps casual gamers to know some of the faces in the game. If Smash was filled with obscure characters like Ness, Captain Falcon, the Ice Climbers, Marth, Roy, Pit, Olimar, and ROB, many casual gamers or non-gamers would be indifferent towards smash. Once they see faces they recognize, it makes the game automatically feel a bit familiar. Then, such characters as Marth, Pit, Olimar, ROB seem like cool and unique oddballs. For you see, each character has a role in how the gamers perceive the game.The non-gaming public has no idea about who's this or who's that (If that's your definition). Maybe they know Mario or Sonic or Link but not well enough. Megaman is not an exception in this case. Basically, the gameplay and accessibility of the game will have to take care of the casual-gamers and the non-gamers. The characters are purely fan service for the nintendo fans and maybe some fans outside nintendo if there is gonna be a 3rd party
These surprisingly numerous amount of words don't matter UNLESS you were also talking about new franchises such as Xenoblade or TLS. If you were talking about them then ignore the many words above. Lol.
I have a list of about 3 or 4 dozen Nintendo IP's that could get a large amount of content in smash.
I personally don't get the hate for clones. I would personally use Pico even if he ended up being a Melee-styled Snake clone. Its the character, him/herself being in that matters the most to me. I want to see the characters I love from Nintendo's various games not because I think they would have interesting moveset potential, but because I love their games, their character, their importance to Nintendo, and developed a bond with those characters over the years.Junior with a paintbrush would be interesting and I could see myself enjoying playing as him. But I don't support him due to likelihood of him being a semi-clone.
also, this. i'd rather see new characters have new movesets, but the clones we have are fine as-is. even Captain Ganondorf doesn't bother me.I personally don't get the hate for clones. I would personally use Pico even if ended up being a Melee-styled Snake clone. Its the character, him/herself being in that matters the most to me. I want to see the characters I love from Nintendo's various games not because I think they would have interesting moveset potential, but because I love their games, their character, their importance to Nintendo, and developed a bond with those characters over the years.
That's fine.i could go for both. and i wouldn't be upset if toad did end up getting in instead of jr.
i'd just rather see jr.
Leaf can technically use magic though so that is a bad example.Chrono cares so little about Leaf that he wouldn't mind if he was presented as a magic user in Smash. Doesn't care about the character at all, just the design.
Shameless Toad plug in I see=???So yes, there would be fans that would buy the game for a certain nintendo character inevitably. Most notably, Toad since his fanbase in and out of Japan is huge (Not comparable to the current characters but hey, you can say the same to 3/4 of the so called potential newcomers).
No Mario newcomer is anywhere near as big as Sonic or wanted as Sonic. That comparison is silly. Nobody will go all over Smash because it has Toad playable!It also doesn't matter whether the mario newcomer is unique or not. Sonic was boring as **** yet a lot of fans bought smash bros. brawl just because of Sonic.
Pretty much every Toad fan is buying each smash game at this because Mario, Luigi, Peach, Bowser, Yoshi, and Wario are already in it. It's not like Toad is a deal breaker.Okay. Even though Toad's smash fanbase (Smash fanbase - The fans who want this certain character to be in smash) isn't really as active as his normal fanbase (Normal fanbase - Like the character. Period), both fanbases would still buy the game just for the character or maybe other characters for obvious reasons unless they dislike Smash or something.
You mean K. Rool and Dixie Kong=??? Yeah, they would attract some old school DKC fans, who have been coming out of the wood works. But that's about it!Note that this also applies for the other present franchises that could possibly or most... "Likely" get newcomers.
See, I didn't use that post to counter what shortie said. I used what shortie said to make a point. A point you may have ignored otherwise.And also, you should read what Shorts said.
Bowser Jr. versus Toad again?
Bowser Jr. versus Toad
Bowser Jr. versus Toad
I'd buy the game if Toad was playable.Shameless Toad plug in I see=???While he would be a "familiar face" for non-gamers and casual gamers to make them feel more comfortable with the game, it would not attract more Mario addicts to buy smash. Instead, it would attract those who use Mario lightly. Dang, I'm making Mario sound like a drug/drug dealer!
No Mario newcomer is anywhere near as big as Sonic or wanted as Sonic. That comparison is silly. Nobody will go all over Smash because it has Toad playable!![]()
In other words, you fit the 1st point I posted.No character needs to be in. There are no specific character exclusion that would keep me from buying the game as all the necessary characters were added in Brawl.
Besides, you would buy Smash 4 regardless. There's literally nothing Nintendo needs to do to lock up the sale of your smash game, except keep your absolute favorite relevant characters playable, and maybe throw you a bone or two.1.The characters that are the most demanded. This is done in order to assure that the current customers will remain customers and buy the next smash game(s).[COLLAPSE="Here is the rest of the list:"]2. Add characters that would help grow the customer size. This is done to get new customers.
3. Add characters that would raise the value to the franchise.
4.Add characters that would create (positive) hype hype for future Smash entries (as a newcomer or even a veteran).
5.Add characters with a lot of originality. I mean c'mon, who wasn't intrigued by Fox, Snake, or the Pokémon Trainer=??? That intrigue makes people interested.
6.Add any character (or really anything) that makes people want to play the game enough to buy it or consider buying it. At least about half of the newcomers should do this.[/COLLAPSE]
Mega Man is popular in Japan, too. Also, considering how few "important" characters we have left, it's not a stretch to say Mega Man is one of the most "important" left, because most of the most "important" characters to Nintendo are already playable in Smash, specifically all the 1:A and 1:B stars of gaming (Bowser, Peach, Zelda, Diddy Kong, Sonic).I don't think MegaMan is really to important. To American fans maybe yeah, but not on an international base. Though it could work if Japan wants him to, as EarthBound never reached Europe either for example.
no "D" in abomination. an "abdomination" is something you'd need Pepto Bismol for.ABDOMINATION.
(-l^l-);
Abomination regarding the beautifully deep, emotional, and intelligent character that is Master Chief is another word for artistic greatness!Maybe we would buy it... but I wonder if it will be just be complete ABDOMINATION.