Thought I would repost this now, because it's more active~
Okay so THIS is what started my crackpot theory, this quote:
When deciding on which characters to include, Sakurai laid out certain criteria a character had to meet for inclusion. Firstly, and most importantly, a character had to individually stand out. "There had to be something that only that character could do," Sakurai said. He knew that characters couldn't be included at random, since including any old Nintendo character would throw off the overall game balance. Sakurai also mentioned that even among Nintendo characters, there were some they couldn't consider due to intellectual property rights issues. In addition, characters within a series needed to have proper balance and representation.
So I went, what Nintendo character is material to be a playable character, who has been consistantly requested,
AND DID NOT SHOW UP AT ALL, in Brawl?
Some said, Krystal, because she was "owned by Rare" (Not true), but SHE DID show up in Brawl, a few times, actually. Some said F-Zero obscure characters, but why would they be playable?
I said, GENO. We all know he has licensing issues, we saw his little Square Enix shoutout at the end of M&L: Parnters in Time.
You may say: "But SAKURAI SAID"
IGN: Have you received interest from other third parties who would very much like to have their characters included in Smash Bros. Brawl?
Masahiro Sakurai: Nope. No other ones.
Well, I bolded YOU and FROM because Sakurai clearly states some NINTENDO characters could not be added, like HE looked into it, not that he was approached, ANNNNNND, we know Sakurai doesn't consider Geno a third party:
Super Mario series
(1) Koopa: 169 (Bowser)
(2) Princess Peach: 66
(3) Wario: 65
(4) Kinopio: 27 (Toad)
(5) Nokonoko: 9 (Koopa Troopa)
(6) Kamec: 8 (Magikoopa)
(7) Kuribou: 7 (Goomba)
(8) Mallow (Mario RPG): 5
(8) Geno (Mario RPG): 5
(10) Baby Mario: 3
So, what requested, and hyped NINTENDO character who DIDN'T SHOW UP IN BRAWL, would have IP ISSUES ACCORDING TO SAKURAI?
Motha ****in' Geno.