Pieman0920
Smash Master
....
Okay one last time. Just this one last time. I hope you actually read my post instead of ignore it, though I admit I keep on editing in little clarifications in there, so maybe its my fault that you don't seem to be getting what I'm writing.
*ahem*
The idea that Palutena is the most likely character for an additional Kid Icarus character is an opinion. The idea that a character is more enjoyable or appealing than another is also an opinion.
Your statement is clearly an opinion.
What your statement is actually an opinion on is not clear.
In it you state that a character is better (in your opinion) than another because they are playable and that there is nothing else that can change your opinion simply because of this.
You have not played the game.
Your opinion does not seem to be based on appeal because you had not played the game and thus didn't play as him yourself.
Your opinion thus appears to be one that is saying that the character in question is better suited to be playable in Smash 4.
In my opinion one wouldn't have generated that sort of opinion if they had actually played the game, and thus I expressed that opinion of mine.
You can think Magnus is a better character than Palutena. I guess you can even think he's a better character because hes playable (even when never playing him yourself) and not because of personality. I have learned today that people can come to opinions based off of things like this even if it makes no sense to me.
Okay one last time. Just this one last time. I hope you actually read my post instead of ignore it, though I admit I keep on editing in little clarifications in there, so maybe its my fault that you don't seem to be getting what I'm writing.
*ahem*
The idea that Palutena is the most likely character for an additional Kid Icarus character is an opinion. The idea that a character is more enjoyable or appealing than another is also an opinion.
Your statement is clearly an opinion.
What your statement is actually an opinion on is not clear.
In it you state that a character is better (in your opinion) than another because they are playable and that there is nothing else that can change your opinion simply because of this.
You have not played the game.
Your opinion does not seem to be based on appeal because you had not played the game and thus didn't play as him yourself.
Your opinion thus appears to be one that is saying that the character in question is better suited to be playable in Smash 4.
In my opinion one wouldn't have generated that sort of opinion if they had actually played the game, and thus I expressed that opinion of mine.
You can think Magnus is a better character than Palutena. I guess you can even think he's a better character because hes playable (even when never playing him yourself) and not because of personality. I have learned today that people can come to opinions based off of things like this even if it makes no sense to me.