Big-Cat
Challenge accepted.
Yeah, but if you're going to have the option for another playstyle set, just make another one. It's not like another Pokemon Trainer would be so animation heavy.No point. A PT can hold six Pokemon anyway.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah, but if you're going to have the option for another playstyle set, just make another one. It's not like another Pokemon Trainer would be so animation heavy.No point. A PT can hold six Pokemon anyway.
Ew, let's keep them seperate. People like me would kill everyone if that mess was created.No point. A PT can hold six Pokemon anyway.
Or just call him Pokemon Trainer, since he reps them all, not just Red(the top one).I played Collosseum, how come I don't know about him?
I know yellow is no real trainer in the games, but just make it Red instead and unofficially call him Yellow, problem solved.
In XD anyway, Eagun was an old sage with the Pikachu family that lived in the tree place, that's name actually escapes me...I don't remember an Eagun, wasn't Colosseum's guy Wes?
It would just annoy me to see two trainers on the roster. I feel giving him a switch between Kanto & Hoenn bangs out a whole 3rd gen rep, while keeping the beloved 1st gens.Ew, let's keep them seperate. People like me would kill everyone if that mess was created.
Someone has read the manga.If you mean calling PT Yellow, Yellow's a girl. The one in Pokemon Yellow itself is still Red.(and technically Ash if you want to stretch it) Yellow isn't actually playable in the games.
Of course not. Pokemon Yellow, however, is another story. It's based completely off the Anime, so that could indeed be Ash instead.
If we see another trainer, I pray to Arceus that it isn't another starter combo. We need more types represented, and more depth of representation. Cubchoo, Scrafty, Golurk would allow me to die happy. There you have three Pokemon that are varied in size, reasonably recognizable/popular, and they bring completely new types to Smash that have never been playable (Ice, Dark, Ghost/Ground). Plus we could all die from cuteness overload when Cubchoo sneezes.Ew, let's keep them seperate. People like me would kill everyone if that mess was created.
Pokemon Trainer Kanto (Squirt/Ivy/Char)
Pokemon Trainer Unova, (Sniv/Sam/Em FS: Victini) (To play as Victini from the begining is the same way you play as ZSS from the begining)
You realize the name Ash was actually from the games too, right? It was an option. It was incorporated into the English Anime.And I would be all for renaming Pokemon Trainer "Red" in Smash 4. Something about ambiguity just makes me sad. I mean, the manga (and everything else) are based off of the games, so that's where "Red" comes from in the manga. It's just the default name for the trainer, and that would make me a happy Breadbug.
Never mind then about the manga. Your loss.Of course not. Pokemon Yellow, however, is another story. It's based completely off the Anime, so that could indeed be Ash instead.
Also, Red isn't in Pokemon Puzzle League either.
Then again, Red isn't actually in Brawl.
I know that Pokemon Trainer isn't the Red featured in the narratives of Gold/Silver, but there could be countless Reds. Just like there are countless Links (another character whose name you can change).You realize the name Ash was actually from the games too, right? It was an option. It was incorporated into the English Anime.
And no, because that's not Red anyway. I'd rather it be Pokemon Trainer, since he reps all existing trainers by himself. I find that a lot better than giving one trainer some special treatment, especially when there's no reason to. Likewise, Red had all his Pokemon(save Pikachu) fully evolved. That's not the case with PT.
No worries. I've forgotten all about it.@Metal: Agate Village! That was the name. xD
@ Red Discussion: I'd actually like him being "Red." After all, he was canonically called it in Gold, Silver, Crystal, Stadium 2, HeartGold, and SoulSilver.
@Giant Breadbug: Wow. This entire time, I thought your name was Giant BreadBOX. Being a Pikmin fan, I now feel like an idiot. Especially considering I called you Giant Breadbox on a few occasions.
Maybe the Nintendo characters will get meters when they release Capcom vs Nintendo. But no X-Factor. And definitley no Pandora Mode! Gems however...I skimmed the latest meter discussion briefly. Meter has a lot of depth behind it if done right. Consider it like MP. It's not stupid or anything like that. Now, if it was like X-Factor....
Perhaps it could be him prior to fully evolving Ivysaur and Squirtle? I'm just grasping at straws, aren't I? xD That is a pretty valid point.No worries. I've forgotten all about it.
I really wanted something cool, like Waterwraith or Titan Dweevil, but they were taken...
And I think the issue Falcon has with calling him Red is that the Red from Gold/Silver was a hardened, tough trainer with Venusaur, Charizard, and Blastoise, where the one we have now is just a random trainer, which is a good point.
I still want him to have a name, though. Red would do just fine. Not that it has to be that Red.
Red is not in Brawl. That's my point. They shouldn't give a name to a character that's not in there.Never mind then about the manga. Your loss.
I'm not sure about what you're trying to say with your other points though. But then again what does any of this have to do with Smash? lol
EDIT: I gotta agree with Breadbug. He should get his original name back. It's like calling Link the "nameless swordsmen" or Ness/Lucas "some random kid."
Looks like Red, talks like Red, and uses the starter Pokemon associated with Red.Red is not in Brawl. That's my point. They shouldn't give a name to a character that's not in there.
He's a mash-up of all Pokemon Trainers while using Red's DESIGN. Red is not in Smash.
If he was Red, he'd be called that way. And no, he doesn't talk like Red either. Those were just put in to make him sound cooler. It's just Pokemon Trainer.Looks like Red, talks like Red, and uses the starter Pokemon associated with Red.
IMO he's Red, but it's okay if you think otherwise, this is all subjective anyway. Besides it's not like you actually play as him. lol
The thing of it is, there isn't just one Red. I don't know about everyone else, but I am perfectly aware that Pokemon Trainer is not Red from Gold/Silver. That doesn't mean he can't be just some other Red.If he was Red, he'd be called that way. And no, he doesn't talk like Red either. Those were just put in to make him sound cooler. It's just Pokemon Trainer.
It's the same problem as assuming Toon Sheik was meant to be Tetra. Name is specific for a reason.
And he doesn't use Red's same Pokemon. Red uses the fully evolved forms during the only specific canon time you fought him. PT uses a mixup of evolution, to separate him from the inspiration. This is just as bad as calling Red... Ash. They're all separate characters, both inspired by Red.
No, there's never been more than one Red.The thing of it is, there isn't just one Red. I don't know about everyone else, but I am perfectly aware that Pokemon Trainer is not Red from Gold/Silver. That doesn't mean he can't be just some other Red.
It was this episode.Red appears in the anime? Which episode?!
Or to connect the actual stories. All the stories are supposed to be connected in order(not counting the spinoffs), atleast from what I can tell.the only reason i think that they called him "Red" in gold version was because i thought nintendo was just trying to insinuate at the fact that it was most likely THE original trainer from the Red/Blue series.
traditionally, any average kid might have named him "ash." back then.
and i found it odd that he had a lvl 81 pikachu, which is usually seen as his strongest pokemon (or at least then one that WOULD have the highest level.)
but im not a pokemon expert :] (really im not)