Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Ok, I would say that Waluigi has 51% chance to enter ...@Sonic Poke: I got to say I give you props when it comes to defending Waluigi.
But still, you have to look at it realistically, just lime everybody mentioned, he's a spin character before anything, he simply isn't significant enough to fit the Smash roster, but that's not to say he doesn't stand a chance, the fact is he has a slim chance, and by slim I mean like the way he is, buy ai doubt Sakurai would even bother, someone like Wart IMO would be much better than a silly spin-off character.
A cameo? That is not a big deal. Waluigi being a new WarioWare employee would be a big deal. Waluigi being playable in a new Wario Land game would be a big deal. Waluigi being playable in a New Super Mario Bros. game would be a big deal. Oh, wait... they decided to go with Toad and Mii instead of Waluigi. Must be because even Nintendo knows that Waluigi's only purpose is to be Wario's partner and Luigi's rival in those sports spin-off games, which is why Waluigi was created in the first place. All Waluigi does is prop Wario and Luigi.
The problem with solely being in spin-offs is that it means that the character is not that important to the Mario universe, even if he has appeared in a ton of spin-off games. Nintendo will not go out of their way to put in a purely spin-off character instead of someone that has had important mainstream appearances.I agree with almost everything, except that Waluigi is unworthy. Even being a spin-off it loads a legion of fans.
Yes, but he also has his Wario Land series. Wario is not purely a spin-off character whereas Waluigi is.shinhed-echi said:And maybe I'm wrong but... isn't Warioware a spinoff series? I'm not supporting Waluigi, I'm just pointing out that his inclusion really isn't too farfetched.
You would be surprised. @ the Waluigi fanboys and fangirls who would try to use this and Dance Dance Revolution: Mario Mix to support WaluigiYeah I know it's not revolutionary to Nintendo or anything, just correcting the fact that he was at least in one cameo in Warioware. No point in seeing this as Waluigi's golden ticket to get in as a Warioware rep.
What don't I think of ninten? Well here goes:What do you think of Ninten?
As long as they make his moveset different from Ness' and Lucas', I'm fine with him.What do you think of Ninten?
*huge image*
There are requirements for Smash characters. Two of them are:L-a-t-e-r-a-l-u-s said:I just want to throw this idea out there; What if there are no requirements for smash characters? What if it's just whatever is most "suiting" stylistically? That's kindof how I feel towards smash characters :\
I mean, aside from that, I hear these "rules" being thrown around in this entire thread, and I am guilty of it too, "personality", "relevance", "moveset potential"... I've come to a consensus that it's just aesthetics and what would look best in smash as fighters...@Sonic Poke: Not interested in seeing him in. Earthbound is overrep with two characters, it doesn't need three. And beside, Ninten would be a clone of Ness and we don't need clones.There are requirements for Smash characters. Two of them are:
- They must have originated in video games.
- They must have appeared on a Nintendo console once.
Well other than that, I guess there are invisible rules such as:I mean, aside from that, I hear these "rules" being thrown around in this entire thread, and I am guilty of it too, "personality", "relevance", "moveset potential"... I've come to a consensus that it's just aesthetics and what would look best in smash as fighters...
That's exactly what I mean!What don't I think of ninten? Well here goes:
-I LOVED Mother 1. It's perhaps my favorite in the series.
-He might look too similar to Ness, something which will immediately turn off some people. Official renders may point to this belief, but the ingame sprites of Ness and Ninten look nothing alike to me (other than a red cap)
-Ninten should have his own moveset, instead of stealing Ana's.
-I support Ninten so that Mother 1, 2, and 3 all get their main protagonists.
-I wouldn't even mind if Ninten is a faster Ness with "Pichu properties" (hurting himself a bit due to being considerably weaker).
Final Smash should at least be different. The melodies of 8 notes would be really cool. Putting everyone to sleep, or a random status.
How so? More like 15% maybe even less, I don't have nothing against but many would agree, he just doesn't stand a chance agaisnt the likes of Bowser Jr.Ok, I would say that Waluigi has 51% chance to enter ...
Well of course, but I mean... I think we should all stop expecting reasons for as to why such and such character should be in... and our suggestions/ideas should just be put out there. No need for a bs reason like "well he has enough personality" or "well he has enough moveset potential"... Sakurai is pretty good at pulling personality and movesets out of his booty -cough Captain Falcon cough-Well other than that, I guess there are invisible rules such as:
-Being an important character to the series.
You can't expect one of Dogma's sidekicks from Fire Emblem to be a fully playable character, because that would be extremely unlikely.
In that case, I have to agree that throwing around rules is a poor form to appear as a smart debater of SSB4. We don't know the criteria for getting a character in so we can't throw stuff like size and relevance as an absolute factor because while they help determine character selection, they aren't the absolute barrier to a character's inclusion.I mean, aside from that, I hear these "rules" being thrown around in this entire thread, and I am guilty of it too, "personality", "relevance", "moveset potential"... I've come to a consensus that it's just aesthetics and what would look best in smash as fighters...
There isn't requirements. There isn't rules. Sakurai gave some guidelines for characters he wanted to add TO BRAWL, but guidelines aren't rules and Sakurai wasn't dedicated to follow them.I just want to throw this idea out there; What if there are no requirements for smash characters? What if it's just whatever is most "suiting" stylistically? That's kindof how I feel towards smash characters :\
So, can I be the one to say, that from now on in this thread we stop making up silly reasons and just leave peoples opinions and be free to say "I'm not sure he'd be a good choice, I just don't feel like he'd suit the smash scene." and leave it at that? I mean, there are many characters that as a collective we've agreed on, but there are many others we've had... conflicting opinions about.In that case, I have to agree that throwing around rules is a poor form to appear as a smart debater of SSB4. We don't know the criteria for getting a character in so we can't throw stuff like size and relevance as an absolute factor because while they help determine character selection, they aren't the absolute barrier to a character's inclusion.
How so? More like 15% maybe even less, I don't have nothing against but many would agree, he just doesn't stand a chance agaisnt the likes of Bowser Jr.
I'm all for Caeda. Moar girls in smash please.Okay, better stop arguing about Waluigi, as this will lead to nothing. What do you think about Caeda?
It would be nice a character who uses a spear!
I don't think Caeda has a good chance of getting in (Or any new Fire Emblem character). She would be interesting, but relevance and recent popularity is the only reason why she could get in.Sonic Poke said:Okay, better stop arguing about Waluigi, as this will lead to nothing. What do you think about Caeda?
It would be nice a character who uses a spear!
I see what you mean.Well of course, but I mean... I think we should all stop expecting reasons for as to why such and such character should be in... and our suggestions/ideas should just be put out there. No need for a bs reason like "well he has enough personality" or "well he has enough moveset potential"... Sakurai is pretty good at pulling personality and movesets out of his booty -cough Captain Falcon cough-
Well according to Sakurai these are the basic standards he goes off of for most characters:I just want to throw this idea out there; What if there are no requirements for smash characters? What if it's just whatever is most "suiting" stylistically? That's kindof how I feel towards smash characters :\
Mine consist ofI see what you mean.
For me at least, priority goes like so:
1.- Is he/she a main character to his franchise?
2.- Does he/she have some sort of unique importance to Nintendo?
3.- Does he/she have unique moveset potential?
4.- Is he/she a sidekick/rival to the main character of a franchise?
5.- Is he/she the main villain of the franchise? (or at least recurring)?
6.- Does he/she have an appealing design that fits well with the game.
7.- Is his/her/its game good? (Irrelevant, I know)
Those are the rules in which I stand for when suggesting characters.
The female thing was a semi joke. I tend to lean towards female characters as my mains in basically all fighting games for the soul reason that they're normally fast attackers.I don't see the point of adding a female just for them being female.
I want to see good characters, not token characters
Ironically, in Smash Bros. they're slow (unless you count their alternate forms, Sheik and ZSS).The female thing was a semi joke. I tend to lean towards female characters as my mains in basically all fighting games for the soul reason that they're normally fast attackers.
Your criteria sucks, especially the first one. Really? Would you put in a female character who is not important, not very popular, or even has no moves over a male character who is more important, is very popular, or even have some moves?Mine consist of
1. Are they female?
2. Do the look pretty cool / fighter worthy, not boss worthy?
3. Moveset?
Of course I count alternates -points to main character in brawl-Ironically, in Smash Bros. they're slow (unless you count their alternate forms, Sheik and ZSS).
Now your talking, Caeda definetly has a chance at it, why you ask? Well...Okay, better stop arguing about Waluigi, as this will lead to nothing. What do you think about Caeda?
It would be nice a character who uses a spear!
I disagree, the fact that you mentioned popularity makes her very likely to make the roster,unless we get a new FE game before SSB4 development begins, we aren't likely to see a new rep.I don't think Caeda has a good chance of getting in (Or any new Fire Emblem character). She would be interesting, but relevance and recent popularity is the only reason why she could get in.
It is undoubtedly the best idea I read about Caeda!Now your talking, Caeda definetly has a chance at it, why you ask? Well...
- She has and plays a significant role in Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon along Marth who is already an established character in the Smash series.
-Would offer unique possibilities such as a Lance rather than the tiring cast of Sword users, has room to work with and potentially a fast character.
-The argument about her riding a Peguses would be invalid, just like Captain Falcon she can be adjusted to play just as any other unit, or in this case other Smash characters.
-She is a female, Smash needs more females to represent Smash.
Aside from those, she definetly has a good chance and the fact that Shadow Dragon sold quite well also works in her favor.
Final Smash Idea: Summons her troop of Peguses Knights, rides they in air and she perform the ultimate Triangle Attack with of course consist of 3 lance users.
We have yet to see a non-Lord make an appearance as a playable character. Her biggest problem is that she is a knight and if a new Fire Emblem game comes with a new Lord, her chances mostly goes down the drain. I have my doubts about a third Fire Emblem rep being playable unless a new game gets announced soon.I disagree, the fact that you mentioned popularity makes her very likely to make the roster,unless we get a new FE game before SSB4 development begins, we aren't likely to see a new rep.