Berserker.
:^)
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2009
- Messages
- 18,990
Fox is a flaw? He isn't even near broken.
Majority says the brawl is fine as is. The only clear flaw I see is MK and Ganondorf..... But that's it. It successfully appealed to the competitive fanbase. Like it or not. Hell forth, it even got in MLG.... For a short time. Brawl is still successful as fan service and as a game according to the majority. The only people I see that hate brawl are those who can't accept the change.
Brawl IS NOT a downgrade. Sakurai simply slow down the physics and made it more accessible to the casual side of the fanbase. I'm not saying the casuals could not handle the technical aspect of Melee (But I know a lot of people who couldn't handle Melee's competitive-ness) but that's the only thing Sakurai did and it wasn't bad. The defensive nature of Brawl is something to complain about... But it isn't worth whining about. So what if it's too defensive? Does that disadvantage itself make Brawl... AN AUTOMATIC BAD GAME?
No.
The people who disliked brawl just look at the negatives and emphasize on it too much. Why can't they just look at the good things. Hell, Brawl has like 10x more good things than bad things. Well the only thing bad is the defensive nature and those 2 characters, MK and Ganondorf. Oh... And I forgot about the 1 Player modes BUT then again, Brawl is not about single player mode. Sure Sakurai spent so much space on SSE (Which wasn't so good) but THEN AGAIN THEN AGAIN, there are more good things that outweigh the bad. Although, some people play brawl for a different reason, mostly it's for fan service and competitive play so group mode and well of course, the roster is what usually comes first.
You might say Group mode is lackluster-- What the ****.... How is it lackluster. It's got your usual gameplay. Beat him up then knock him off stage. It has items, special mode, rotation and tourney. Just like in Melee (Although Melee never had rotation).
Regarding the roster..... Brawl has a better roster. Enough said. Don't even try excluding the clone problem because it's still a bad thing. It's even worse than semi clones. Brawl had 5 semi clones and Melee had like.... 6 CLONES and 1 semi clone. Regarding the fan service POV, Brawl's character additions were reasonable... Excluding ROB (Unless I'm missing something here). They were all great additions AND the roster was positively received. As for melee's, I can't tell about the majority's opinion. The only thing I know is that one of the people I know, Brosis, disliked the melee roster but does that matter (No offense Brosis ).
Overall, Brawl IS NOT a downgrade. It's just made some drastic changes which didn't do much bad. In fact, it brought up some new mechanics. Instead of it being a technical spam fest, it encouraged more patience, precision, mindgames and carefulness. You have to be more dependent on your skills. Not the character's techs or the universal techs.
I'm not saying melee is bad. It's actually a fun and awesome game. I just hate how the melee players look down at brawl.
-----------
Although I agree with Chu being close minded, what he said was right
Majority says the brawl is fine as is. The only clear flaw I see is MK and Ganondorf..... But that's it. It successfully appealed to the competitive fanbase. Like it or not. Hell forth, it even got in MLG.... For a short time. Brawl is still successful as fan service and as a game according to the majority. The only people I see that hate brawl are those who can't accept the change.
Brawl IS NOT a downgrade. Sakurai simply slow down the physics and made it more accessible to the casual side of the fanbase. I'm not saying the casuals could not handle the technical aspect of Melee (But I know a lot of people who couldn't handle Melee's competitive-ness) but that's the only thing Sakurai did and it wasn't bad. The defensive nature of Brawl is something to complain about... But it isn't worth whining about. So what if it's too defensive? Does that disadvantage itself make Brawl... AN AUTOMATIC BAD GAME?
No.
The people who disliked brawl just look at the negatives and emphasize on it too much. Why can't they just look at the good things. Hell, Brawl has like 10x more good things than bad things. Well the only thing bad is the defensive nature and those 2 characters, MK and Ganondorf. Oh... And I forgot about the 1 Player modes BUT then again, Brawl is not about single player mode. Sure Sakurai spent so much space on SSE (Which wasn't so good) but THEN AGAIN THEN AGAIN, there are more good things that outweigh the bad. Although, some people play brawl for a different reason, mostly it's for fan service and competitive play so group mode and well of course, the roster is what usually comes first.
You might say Group mode is lackluster-- What the ****.... How is it lackluster. It's got your usual gameplay. Beat him up then knock him off stage. It has items, special mode, rotation and tourney. Just like in Melee (Although Melee never had rotation).
Regarding the roster..... Brawl has a better roster. Enough said. Don't even try excluding the clone problem because it's still a bad thing. It's even worse than semi clones. Brawl had 5 semi clones and Melee had like.... 6 CLONES and 1 semi clone. Regarding the fan service POV, Brawl's character additions were reasonable... Excluding ROB (Unless I'm missing something here). They were all great additions AND the roster was positively received. As for melee's, I can't tell about the majority's opinion. The only thing I know is that one of the people I know, Brosis, disliked the melee roster but does that matter (No offense Brosis ).
Overall, Brawl IS NOT a downgrade. It's just made some drastic changes which didn't do much bad. In fact, it brought up some new mechanics. Instead of it being a technical spam fest, it encouraged more patience, precision, mindgames and carefulness. You have to be more dependent on your skills. Not the character's techs or the universal techs.
I'm not saying melee is bad. It's actually a fun and awesome game. I just hate how the melee players look down at brawl.
-----------
Although I agree with Chu being close minded, what he said was right