"Following in the footsteps of the professional" in this case = C&D waiting to happen...
In general with regard to Project M i would agree with you however in the context of the argument and the comments that were previously made, it's not as simple as you present it.
On the page where i am discussing whether or not the hunters should be playable characters, i made the comment that Ridley was really the only debatable playable character. Someone replied asking about the inclusion of dark samus to which i said AT status. Let sakurai make the decision. While it may not have been clear then, i stated the intentions i had in making that comment later in the argument.
"In saying what i did earlier, all i wanted to point out was that if the PMBR were trying to be as professional as possible then why not follow in the footsteps of the professional. I wasn't trying to say that his word is final regardless of what we say or think." - Me
Now in the context of the argument i was referring to dark samus' inclusion as an Assist Trophy and NOT a playable character in smash 4 as what we should be doing by "following in the footsteps of the professional." Now whether i was referring to dark samus as being included in PM as an assist trophy or not being playable at all does not matter because both instances still fall under the category of "following in the footsteps of the professional" where the professional (Sakurai) has made the decision to not include dark samus as a character which deserved representation in the realm of playable characters. Where the line gets blurry is depending on our actions, yes a C&D may be issued if dark samus is included as an assist trophy replacement in project m, or no a C&D will not occur because we decided to leave him/her out altogether.
All that being said, your comment would be correct if you said "could possibly result" but in this case you said "in this case =C&D waiting to happen" meaning this is an all or nothing situation. Because it is somewhere inbetween, by default your statement is technically incorrect.
Being professional doesn't mean following other professionals. In fact, I would say it's more professional to carve your own path with your own decisions rather than to simply copy what others have done. If PMBR followed all you Sakurai's decisions because he's supposedly more professional, you know what Project M would be? It would just be Brawl. It's better that PMBR do things their way, and no one else's.
I agree that being professional doesn't mean following other professionals but for a community group of amateur game developers/designers "following in the footsteps" refers to taking inspiration from and not copying exactly. I especially think this group would want to pay attention to this specific developer in that he pretty much created the game genre himself.
Sakurai isn't supposedly more professional, he is a professional where the PMBR are not. Although it can be argued that money has nothing to do with it, in this case there is something to be said about the legitimacy of a multi million dollar game series vs a mod based off of said game series. Also keep in mind who has more developing experience.
It's better the BR do things in their own way. I can agree with that especially when the BR themself said they wanted to present the most professional product that they can. This doesn't mean mimic every move of a developer. This means look at a decision a developer made and ask why they made it. Then see if the same decision or a similar decision can/cannot be applied to your own product based on what you intend to create.
I'm not sure whether your last remark was a shot being fired at brawl. If it was, keep in mind that without Brawl, Project M wouldn't even exist.
Sorry everyone, I've lowered this thread's integrity.
You've nothing to be worried about. This threads integrity is resting on the case of NisforSmash v Smashboards. (Although i wish it didn't have to be like this)