Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
People don't think it's as good as the first 5(or 6 depending on who you are)I don't get everyone's beef with MP10 anyway.
It's a solid game in it's own right and I actually had fun with it even as single player for a while.
Opinion, friend. That still won't stop me from getting Ultra Smash for Christmas.MP10 is easily better than what Ultra Smash is shaping up to be. At least that game has actual content.
Probadly because most people grew up with them and don't like 10 being luck based. I think that the new mechanic is ok on 9 and 10, but I prefer the old one where you're by yourself.I was never too picky about Mario Party games anyway.
I know people go on about how the originals had more strategy, but to be honest I think that isn't saying much. The originals were still quite luck based, and they were always supposed to be simple, fun, carefree games to play with some friends. Not some seriously competitive game.
It'd be nice if Amiibo Party in MP10 had different board layouts, and it is the one game where I was a little miffed on how Rosalina was portrayed (and some other characters), but otherwise I can't find much to fault.
Mario Party 10 still falls a bit short when compared to Mario Party 9 though. Mario Party 9 has as many as 7 boards, and there are more Bowser Jr. minigames than what Mario Party 10 offered. And while it does lack 2 vs. 2 minigames, Mario Party 9 has more minigames than Mario Party 10; 82 vs. 75.MP10 is easily better than what Ultra Smash is shaping up to be. At least that game has actual content.
I can't even believe Nintendo just let that happen.My headcanon became canon:
*Image removed*
No panties.
Same will happen to Peach as well. At least Daisy is wearing shorts so that's good for her.My headcanon became canon:
*Image removed*
No panties.
Peach wears panties (as per usual with the sports outfit) though.Same will happen to Peach as well. At least Daisy is wearing shorts so that's good for her.
Either way, she's not a object. Its like they did it on purpose or something.Peach wears panties (as per usual with the sports outfit) though.
Rosalina just straight up isn't. Yeah she has pantyhose, but most women actually still wear panties under pantyhose.
Either Camelot are awesome, or this is yet another sign of how the game was rushed. XP
They might pull the update and blacken up under Rosalina's skirt like they did on Smash 4.I personally don't see it as bad, I just find it surprising that they got away with it.
You really aren't going to see it too often, only if you get lucky/unlucky (depending on your outlook) with the replay camera.
I wasn't here back then, but I remember you guys were arguing about Peach/Rosalina as a sexualized character. And is it becoming Melee/Brawl all over again? What would happen if the ESRB saw this, or other panties shots? Ask Melee and Brawl raters what would happen, if this was more revealing then I guess it would go up to T for teens. And I guess Rosalina has officially become a sexualized character thanks to fan service. That giantess fetish is acttracting the audience though.My headcanon became canon:
*Image removed*
No panties.
And what next? Back to incomplete feets? It would just be a little weird to do that especially if they don't do it to Peach as well. The way she wears her pantyhose is similiar to the way Zelda wore hers:They might pull the update and blacken up under Rosalina's skirt like they did on Smash 4.
Something makes me feel like Camelot has something to tell us. They seem to have made quite a number of implications considering Rosalina is basically the only redeeming quality of this game. I feel like if Rosalina wasn't in this game, the sales would be way lower. Still planning on getting the game at some point within the next couple months maybe, but I hope for some kind of discount. Despite having Rosalina, this game certainly isn't worth $50.My headcanon became canon:
*Image removed*
No panties.
I also notice Mario Tennis Ultra Smash's reviews and reception isn't that well, but it's still a good game for playing with friends and family.Something makes me feel like Camelot has something to tell us. They seem to have made quite a number of implications considering Rosalina is basically the only redeeming quality of this game. I feel like if Rosalina wasn't in this game, the sales would be way lower. Still planning on getting the game at some point within the next couple months maybe, but I hope for some kind of discount. Despite having Rosalina, this game certainly isn't worth $50.
It pretty much has to do with the fact that Camelot failed to properly censor the underskirt area of Rosalina's tennis outfit.What was with all the talk about pantyhose all of a sudden here?
Beats me...What was with all the talk about pantyhose all of a sudden here?
Those images were clearly of her below skirt and the focus of the images was clear. We've infracted images that crop similar private parts from even Smash itself. The source is irrelevant, the focus was clear. And the reason this board is a stick in the mud about it is because we only have these kind of issues here usually, there's no reason TO post stuff like that.Are we seriously infracting people for screenshots of a 3+ game?
I wouldn't mind only my post is a day old. And I was simply noting it.
This is the only board that is such a stick in the mud about it too.
There's a difference between posting thisPantyhose confirmed 2lewd4me.
Might as well remove every image of Rosalina for her bare shoulders while we are at it.
If you have problems with this issue, please take it over to Forum Support. I don't make the rules here, so please talk to the administrators about it.Pantyhose confirmed 2lewd4me.
Might as well remove every image of Rosalina for her bare shoulders while we are at it.
But you act as if the model details her nether regions to a tee, when it doesn't. It's literally blank and textureless everywhere from her ankle to her crotch.There's a difference between posting this
![]()
and posting images that are looking at her up skirt.
What the model depicts isn't the issue, as I said, it's the focus on the image that matters.But you act as if the model details her nether regions to a tee, when it doesn't. It's literally blank and textureless everywhere from her ankle to her crotch.
They don't even properly model the area beneath her skirt as its flat and featureless when other games have detailed that same area in the past, like MK8 due to her wearing a body suit.
It's pretty much an inevitably that it will be seen so they decided not detail it to begin with.
Also that previous statement about how "this is the only board that does it" is either ignorance or a lie.
In terms of the one I posted, it was extremely far away so I can't really agree. And my comment wasn't saying anything to sexualise the character.What the model depicts isn't the issue, as I said, it's the focus on the image that matters.
EX. I want to use a character with a skirt and bicycle shorts as an avi. If I framed it in such a way where the focus is clearly on the below skirt part, I'd very likely be asked to change it, even though it's not showing anything. It's about the implied message though.
The way those shots are being framed are done in a way that sexualizes the character. Just because she has nothing there doesn't just mean it's ok.