There's holes in your logic.
I was convinced that you're scum as I did not read my PM. I was scum hunting.
And the vote without discussion? What? What would you say at that point? You admit that everything you did up until that point wasn't convincing enough, in that case? Aka, horrible play?
And convincing baddies isn't an accomplishment. They tend to be pretty random. It's not weird to assume that convincing baddies should never be taken into consideration when looking at accomplishments.
Failing to convince two GOOD other player of a scum read and failing to convince one of them that you are town is bad play.
If you were acting as town (which you weren't because you read your PM) then you would not have placed a vote on me. It would be a horrible town move to vote me in that situation where I simply applying pressure to you. I was no where near ending the game and you did, in fact, fold.
I didn't fail to convince "two GOOD other players". What second player was there? You? You want me to convince you that you are scum? What are you talking about?
There was plenty more to discuss with X12. If I were in his position why would I just vote? Moreso over, he didn't even give a reasoning as to why. "I feel Omni is more scum, although, I can see Xonar being scum." I mean... okay? What does that even mean? Where is the logic behind it? As a pivot, your goal is to try to make the intentions of the rest of the players clear. You could even seen he was unclear at one point when I made a point towards you and he misunderstood it.
Again, not saying X1 is a bad player, but his play towards the end of the game was mad sloppy.
I would drop it at this point if I were you, because you're making a fool out of yourself, haha.
*shakes head* Really wish more people would voice their opinion on the game.
I mean.... seriously... you made it through the game by responding to controversial points with:
*Shrug*
Welp.
I was tired.
That's some doodoo.