Mini Mafia

[Omni]

Daykill: Omni

Daykill: Omni again

Seriously, Xonar?

You "Daykilled" me twice. And you want me to believe that you forgot that was the kill command?

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

because
Well

when I play mafia I often forget what my role is and just assume I'm town
that happens when I draw any alignment (or none in this case)

so I thought I was town and then I remembered wanting to kill you so I posed the idea.

my b for not answering.

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

Seriously, Xonar?

You "Daykilled" me twice. And you want me to believe that you forgot that was the kill command?

wel p

 

[Omni]

I think you are scum.
Do you think I am scum, Xonar?

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

I think you have a better chance of being scum than X1, yes.

Let's do the cross shoot and vote thing.

Daykill: Omni
Vote: Omni

 

[#HBC | J]

And with a shot fired at Omni...nothing happened.

Vote Count:

Omni (1) - Xonar
Xonar (0)
X1-12 (0)

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

I mean, this is what it was going to come to, anyway, right?

You're shooting on anti-town anyway, and I'm anti-town because my ideas don't mesh with yours.
Then you found some reason to think I'm scum in, what, 5-10 posts or something? I don't even remember.

That alone is a killable offense for me. I withheld because 3player game, but here we go. All in.

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

Omni went silent.

 

[Omni]

At work. Left to do some printing. Didn't realize you would be so desperate so soon. All I asked was if you thought I was scum so I could get your reasoning behind it.

Seems like I pushed you into a corner and you folded.

Vote: Xonar

Ball's in your court, X1.

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

>implications

Enjoy that, bro.

 

[Omni]

And with a shot fired at Omni...nothing happened.

Vote Count:

Omni (1) - Xonar
Xonar (0)
X1-12 (0)

@Mod:

Spoiler

 

[Omni]

I withheld because 3player game, but here we go. All in.

You are lying.
The game before this was a 3-player game.

 

[X1-12]

aight will end this tonight when I get back from lectures

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

You are lying.
The game before this was a 3-player game.

...
you're making a joke, right?
you know that in the game before this, I didn't even play?

it's not even COMPARABLE

 

[Omni]

It is comparable. Both the same set-up; both 3-player games.
Last game you simply chose to run a scum gambit.
"I withheld because 3player game" is not consistent with your previous actions.

Not sure why you think everything I say is a joke or needs some kind of dramatic response.

X1: What is taking you so long, wtf.

 

[Omni]

Take my hand, X1.

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

It is comparable. Both the same set-up; both 3-player games.
Last game you simply chose to run a scum gambit.
"I withheld because 3player game" is not consistent with your previous actions.

Not sure why you think everything I say is a joke or needs some kind of dramatic response.

Because your logic is horrible, that's why. I just can't comprehend it being serious, so my mind instantly recognizes it as a joke.

Really. Not even kidding here.

 

[Omni]

Well, we'll see if X1 agrees with you that my logic is horrible.

Or if you need a lesson in Logic 101.

 

[Omni]

While we're waiting...

...how does it feel to have been read like a book for the past 2 games straight?

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

especially bad considering your logic is so ****ty :C :C

 

[Omni]

LOL. So are you confirming that my read on you this game is accurate even though the logic is bad?

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

Ill put in sarcasm tags next time lol

 

[X1-12]

re-reading now

 

[X1-12]

I feel Omni comes across as most scummy, but there are definitely places where I feel Xonar is trying to subtly get me onside with him though..

Daykill: Omni

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

but there are definitely places where I feel Xonar is trying to subtly get me onside with him though..

Isn't that what you usually wanna do when you gotta kill some scum?

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

Good catch though, didn't think you'd actively notice.

 

[X1-12]

Yeah but I would expect most townies to convince overtly rather than covertly

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

The convincing was pretty much done when Omni made the terribad change from anti-town to scum on me.

 

[#HBC | Dancer]

I hope town wins this game.

 

[Omni]

X1: If you're scum, GG's. If not, ew.

I don't mind you voting me for the sake of thinking I'm scum, but providing absolutely no reasoning nor any back-or-forth (which is what I was expecting) is pretty poor.

 

[Omni]

@Swordancer: Town lost.

 

[Omni]

Regardless, I think I played awesome.

I blame either Xonar town or X1 town for the lost. <3

 

[ranmaru]

X1 was scum wasn't he

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

Omni, you played horribly.

Once again you can bask into the glory of having a correct scum read on me, only to have that quickly turn on you by the fact that you, once again, was unable to lynch me. AND you were more scummy yourself, but this time you weren't saved by your response to Zen's gambit.

But yeah, once again an experimental game. I didn't even sign up for it so I figured, why not?

 

[Omni]

I disagree.

Everything about my town play and my reads on you were spot-on, logical, and properly produced. I caught you on all of your tells which netted you to responding with most of my inquiries with:

*shrugs*
"I was tired."
"Welp."

X1 is simply silly for not voting you. Well, he is more silly for not discussing what had occurred.

I think your recollection of my play from both games is awful. Zen's gambit didn't save me; in the last game, Axel was going to be lynched; not me. It was me who turned both what was a wagon on me and Axel to a wagon on you by gaining the trust of kuz and a few others.

But I'd love to hear the opinions from the mod and/or spectators. Yours, not so much.

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

It's impossible to say that you've played well when there were two people convinced that you're scum while you were town.
AND you never managed to convince the other player of your scumread.

That's, objectively, bad play. I'm not even putting my opinion in there, it's cold, hard facts.

That wagon switch to me was entirely initiated by Kuz in G3S. But whatevs.

 

[Omni]

See? This is where I think your logic is just... pretty miniscule.

Failing to convince another player of your ideals does not mean I played "horribly". The variable of the other town player's skills needs to be taken into account as well.

I had a game where I was the pivot in a game of mafia. Two towns, 1 mafia left. Both mafia and town cross-voted and I was at pivot. Marshy ended up convincing Chibo to vote me while I voiced to Chibo in several forms that it impossible for me to be scum as the pivot aka the pivot is always clear (or just being an butthole).

Like... this is the logic that I deal with you. Somehow:

Bad play = not being able to convince Player X that Player Y is scum. But you fail to acknowledge when Player X and Player Y are important variables to that equation.

Edit: No, the wagon switch was initiated by me. Axel was going to by lynched. Axel said something I felt what incredibly townie coming from him. I unvoted him and caused a huge uproar. Then we cycled but no one could settle until Kuz asked me who I thought the play was. Which I then said was you.

 

[#HBC | J]

And another shot was fired through the body of Omni and this time he was actually killed!

Omni, Town 1-Shot BP/Dayvig, was killed!

Xonar, Mafia 1-Shot BP/Dayvig, wins!
X1-12, Town 1-Shot BP/Dayvig, loses in the end!

Mafia wins!

Sign ups for the next game have begun. Post in the thread if you are interested!

 

[Vinylic.]

This whole game.

Was the longer version of the last one.

 

[#HBC | ZoZo]

See? This is where I think your logic is just... pretty miniscule.

Failing to convince another player of your ideals does not mean I played "horribly". The variable of the other town player's skills needs to be taken into account as well.

I had a game where I was the pivot in a game of mafia. Two towns, 1 mafia left. Both mafia and town cross-voted and I was at pivot. Marshy ended up convincing Chibo to vote me while I voiced to Chibo in several forms that it impossible for me to be scum as the pivot aka the pivot is always clear (or just being an butthole).

Like... this is the logic that I deal with you. Somehow:

Bad play = not being able to convince Player X that Player Y is scum. But you fail to acknowledge when Player X and Player Y are important variables to that equation.

Edit: No, the wagon switch was initiated by me. Axel was going to by lynched. Axel said something I felt what incredibly townie coming from him. I unvoted him and caused a huge uproar. Then we cycled but no one could settle until Kuz asked me who I thought the play was. Which I then said was you.

Listen bro
I hope you're not implying that X1 is a bad player
because last I heard, he isn't.

Yes, I do consider being unable to convince a good player bad play.
AND two good players were convinced that you are scum.

Miniscule logic my ***, lol.