Miiverse Daily Smash 4 Photos (Closed for its successor)

[Fatmanonice]

I hope tonight's update is more uplifting than the last four. After three meh updates and one of my top 10 getting deconfirmed, I'd like to see the week end on a decent note.

 

[Robert of Normandy]

And yeah... Clearly we need more sword characters.
are not enough...

CLEARLY ALL OF THOSE CHARACTERS ARE THE EXACT SAME, BECAUSE THEY ALL USE SWORDS!

 

[Kaye Cruiser]

Who in their right mind thought: "Gee, we have these 3 characters, but how can we make them unique?"
"I know! Let's make a gimmick that forces them to use all 3!"

 

[Substitution]

I hope tonight's update is more uplifting than the last four. After three meh updates and one of my top 10 getting deconfirmed, I'd like to see the week end on a decent note.

I'm happy for this week, They're showing new information for Smash Flash 2.

 

[MopedOfJustice]

...Kirby isn't a sword character.

And besides, there's far more characters who fight hand-to-hand or some other method combined than there are of those using swords. You're overreacting just like everyone else who whines about it.

More sword characters is just fine. It's not going to kill anyone.

I was joking because of Final Cutter

And I'm not whining, though I generally don't enjoy fighting sword users compared to other types.

My point was that he said we need more. We simply don't. More can be added without it being excessive, but we don't need more.

 

[Pacack]

What's the bad news? They all have chances to be in.

If you need all of them in the game to be satisfied, which was implied by your "and"s, you have a problem.

 

[Kaye Cruiser]

I was joking because of Final Cutter

And I'm not whining, though I generally don't enjoy fighting sword users compared to other types.

My point was that he said we need more. We simply don't. More can be added without it being excessive, but we don't need more.

I said you were overreacting, but I didn't say you were "whining".

And you saying we don't need more is just as subjective. On both of your sides it's nothing more than an opinion. He wants more, you don't.

There's no facts in either side of your debate. That's my point.

 

[Fatmanonice]

If you need all of them in the game to be satisfied, which was implied by your "and"s, you have a problem.

This. Looking back on Brawl, I should have been satisfied that I got half of my top ten list (Wario, Diddy, King Dedede, Olimar, and Pit) instead of whining about the other half that I didn't (Geno, Megaman, Krystal, Ridley, and Vaati) for a solid month.

 

[D-idara]

.... Thinking again... They are right, Ridley is too big... He won´t make it , if he does, will look like a joke a Samus against Ridley (Ridley Jr.)... but they should but at least one more from metroid, and the next one more clear is Dark Samus (that knowing the last smash bros... sound like a new semiclone character )

I don't see what you're saying here, Ridley looks perfect in comparison to all of the other characters in the picture

 

[MylesMad]

In the spirit of the Sakurai season, I predict Zero Suit Samus for tomorrow's pic.

 

[Angelglory]

It's the fountain of youth everytime I see this picture

Hey Angelglory do you have the T stand versions as well?

 

[Morrigan]

I'm not sure how one manages to screw up my name that badly, but here

Spoiler

These are on scale right? This MIGHT convince me of Ridley's feasibility if it weren't for his big ass disjointed head. If his head were to be attached or his neck shortened or some other scale modification then congratulations on convincing me. I still think he looks like a caricature of himself, kind of like this character on this other game:

Spoiler

 

[Kaye Cruiser]

In the spirit of the Sakurai season, I predict Zero Suit Samus for tomorrow's pic.

Spoiler

 

[Ulti-Bman]

It's going to be something new. It seems as though Sakurai's done with the joke pics.

The one day, the ONE day I predict something new to be shown, amongst weeks full of pics showcasing brand new content, Sakurai decides to show something irrelevant! Why, Sakurai? Why?! SAKURAIIIIIIIIIIIIII!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[PSIguy89]

out of everything other argument ive seen regarding smash speculation the size argument is the STUPIDEST one. It really is, I don't even mean for just Ridley either.
I just don't see why you would ever state that it cant be done (resizing) when theres no proof it cant, you know what I mean? either that or a lot of people hate Ridley and use ONE physical quality about him against him. im not even that much of a supporter for him, but man do I find it stupid when someone *seriously* brings it up.

 

[Substitution]

out of everything other argument ive seen regarding smash speculation the size argument is the STUPIDEST one. It really is, I don't even mean for just Ridley either.
I just don't see why you would ever state that it cant be done (resizing) when theres no proof it cant, you know what I mean? either that or a lot of people hate Ridley and use ONE physical quality about him against him. im not even that much of a supporter for him, but man do I find it stupid when someone *seriously* brings it up.

Because some people think they can't re-size, for one reason or another.

 

[Morrigan]

out of everything other argument ive seen regarding smash speculation the size argument is the STUPIDEST one. It really is, I don't even mean for just Ridley either.
I just don't see why you would ever state that it cant be done (resizing) when theres no proof it cant, you know what I mean? either that or a lot of people hate Ridley and use ONE physical quality about him against him. im not even that much of a supporter for him, but man do I find it stupid when someone *seriously* brings it up.

It's not stupid when clear mean-to-be big characters come to play.

Name one playable character that has been greatly reduced for Smash.

 

[Substitution]

It's not stupid when clear mean-to-be big characters come to play.

Name one playable character that has been greatly reduced for Smash.

Um... Erm...
Groudon?...

 

[Morrigan]

Playable.

Well there you go, a resized playable Groudon would look pathetic, some characters are meant to be and stay as bosses, based on their design only.

 

[BKupa666]

out of everything other argument ive seen regarding smash speculation the size argument is the STUPIDEST one. It really is, I don't even mean for just Ridley either.
I just don't see why you would ever state that it cant be done (resizing) when theres no proof it cant, you know what I mean? either that or a lot of people hate Ridley and use ONE physical quality about him against him. im not even that much of a supporter for him, but man do I find it stupid when someone *seriously* brings it up.

Opinion and reality are interchangeable when Too Bigotry comes into play.

 

[PSIguy89]

well I can say that Bowser has been "greatly reduced" in every single spin off game hes been in. for the record I don't think Ridley needs to be greatly reduced anyways...thats kinda stretching it. Think of it like this, Bowser and Ridley have more often than not been portrayed as larger than their arch enemies (Mario and Samus) however they amount they differ in size though, changes quite a bit. Both characters have been resized many times and will probably continue too. Im SURE Ridley can be made to fit with the rest of the cast just fine, inless you have NO belief in Sakurai =p

 

[Substitution]

Playable.

Well there you go, a resized playable Groudon would look pathetic, some characters are meant to be and stay as bosses, based on their design.

Maybe I misspoke a bit.
Look while Ridley is even in my top five (well, more like top 2, the only two I really care about is Megaman and Little Mac), I do realize why people want him in, and I respect that.
What I don't get is the "too big" argument. It just feels like an excuse instead of an actual argument.

 

[No Control]

They can put R.O.B. in the game. They can put Charizard in the game. They can put Rosalina & Luma, Ice Climbers, and Olimar w/ Pikmin in the game. They can put bloody IVYSAUR in the game. They can definitely put Ridley in if they want to. It's just a matter of whether they do.

After all the teasing, all the games when people have been disappointed, I honestly think this time they will.

 

[Networker1]

Well for those playing at home why all of these guys are possibl


Need more sword fighting characters
...
Again need more sword characters

You're kidding right??

Marth, Ike, Meta Knight, Pit, Link, and Toon Link aren't enough for you? (Kirby gets an honorable mention for his up-B)

 

[Xaltis]

If you need all of them in the game to be satisfied, which was implied by your "and"s, you have a problem.

Oh no, I don't NEED all of them to be in the game. Maybe Lloyd haha.

I already know I'm going to love this game a lot. I'm not ungrateful so no worries. :D

 

[Networker1]

CLEARLY ALL OF THOSE CHARACTERS ARE THE EXACT SAME, BECAUSE THEY ALL USE SWORDS!

If you want to be technical Marth and Tink share a N-air and D-smash

 

[FlareHabanero]

If you want to be technical Marth and Tink share a N-air and D-smash

Ness and Donkey Kong share the same neutral air and down aerial.

 

[Xaltis]

Is there anyway you can get Giga Bowser's model in here? I wanna see if he is bigger than Ridley.

 

[Kaye Cruiser]

Playable.

Well there you go, a resized playable Groudon would look pathetic, some characters are meant to be and stay as bosses, based on their design only.

Still seems relatively threatening to me. lol

inb4notofficialdoesn'tcount

Your logic is just plain silly and heavily opinionated, especially considering your example since all Pokemon, even in X and Y, are relatively resized during battle. Gotta have enough room on the screen, after all.

Size doesn't matter. Big things can come in small packages. The bigger they are, the harder they fall. All those other saying.

There's nothing wrong with resizing any kind of boss character. It doesn't subtract from anything at all.

 

[Fastblade5035]

I saw someone mention Ridley being the "Sentinel" of this game, and I think that'd be an awesome idea.

For an example of how big he is compared to a normal character.

 

[Nintendotard]

I saw someone mention Ridley being the "Sentinel" of this game, and I think that'd be an awesome idea.

For an example of how big he is compared to a normal character.

Im fine with this

 

[Morrigan]

Still seems relatively threatening to me. lol

inb4notofficialdoesn'tcount

Your logic is just plain silly and heavily opinionated, especially considering your example since all Pokemon, even in X and Y, are relatively resized during battle. Gotta have enough room on the screen, after all.

Size doesn't matter. Big things can come in small packages. The bigger they are, the harder they fall. All those other saying.

There's nothing wrong with resizing any kind of boss character. It doesn't subtract from anything at all.

lol you can't be serious, is this the same model?

Of course it's opinionated, my opinion is: anything meant to be big, will probably look bad when shrunk. Like taking a poisonous mushroom.

 

[Kaye Cruiser]

lol you can't be serious, is this the same model?

Don't you guys just love it when people skip over certain parts of your post and then ask a stupid question after completely missing the point you were trying to make?

 

[Morrigan]

I edited the post so you might wanna check on that. You opened your post saying how that Groudon looked good, enough said lol. That video pretty much proves it doesn't, and if you think it does and doesn't subtract ANYTHING at all... oh well, to each his own.

 

[TheUltraDeino]

I saw someone mention Ridley being the "Sentinel" of this game, and I think that'd be an awesome idea.

For an example of how big he is compared to a normal character.

What about the wings? Having a giant character with 5 jumps will kinda be OP, then again, they could probably balance it out by making Ridley not be able to grab ledges.

 

[MopedOfJustice]

CLEARLY ALL OF THOSE CHARACTERS ARE THE EXACT SAME, BECAUSE THEY ALL USE SWORDS!

Woops, missed this one somehow.

I didn't say they were the same (except Link and TL, and, too a much lesser extent Marth and Ike).

The other guy said we need more characters that use swords, because they use swords. All I was saying was that we don't have so few that we need more (though that doesn't mean we need to not have anymore either).

Is it really that hard to understand?

 

[Fastblade5035]

What about the wings? Having a giant character with 5 jumps will kinda be OP, then again, they could probably balance it out by making Ridley not be able to grab ledges.

Simple, make his jumps horrifically short like Charizard.

 

[D-idara]

That pic with all the characters posing from the side proves that Ridley's not too big and he has never been, he looks MUCH BIGGER than Samus and yet still falls whithin Bowser's size limits because he's always hunching over. If we see it, then Sakurai, with all of his game-making experience should be able to see it too.

 

[FlareHabanero]

What about the wings? Having a giant character with 5 jumps will kinda be OP, then again, they could probably balance it out by making Ridley not be able to grab ledges.

Trust me, being a massive target is a good enough counterbalance.

 

[Vintage Creep]

Ridley's match entrance consists of him eating a bunch of poison mushrooms and shrinking to match the opponent's size.

Here, problem solved.