Code Bread
Smash Ace
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2014
- Messages
- 577
- 3DS FC
- 1736-1424-9042
Would Nintendo only take action if MLG streamed PM or did they just not know that PM was there.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I think we don't get it i because since nintendo sponsors EVO now and PM is a 3rd party mod, Nintendo wouldn't allow it.I want project M at EVO...
How do you know they knew about PM and said anything about it at all?I dont think so. Some of the good PM players were at the invitational, invited by nintendo specifically. Heck at the invitational they knew of PM and said they didn't care about it one or the other.
I read your comment & it made me read every single other comment & just wow.. I don't understand why their is so much hate towards a game you don't like/don't play. melee is my main game & my favorite. but I can totally understand why people may not like it or have another game as their preferred game. why all the hate ? why can't people respect that others would like to see smash 4 at evo ? just totally blows my mind how people can't respect other peoples opinions.Just read all 5 pages and see why I left smashboards 5years ago. I mean can we just have both? Why do we have to be a Melee Community, Brawl Community, or Smash 4 Community can we just be a SMASH community? A gaming community being divide because of which game gets the Main stage at EVO is silly.
I don't like pointing fingers but a lot of hatred towards new SSB titles are from Melee players. Yes I think Melee was better than Brawl but, does mean Melee will always be better than future installments? No. Should we bash and dismiss fellow Smashers who prefer Brawl over Melee? Absolutely not.
The arguments I hear from Melee players on why Melee > Sm4sh should be at EVO are just downright ignorant.
1. Why are people with SmashBoards join dates from a month to a year are voicing their opinions about who takes the Main stage at EVO?
This is the most ignorant statement and proves why the community is split. For instance I just made a new Smashboards account about a month because I left the Smash scene from the hate that Brawl received from the community also, my old email had got hack. Besides the point even if I were new to Smashboards you don't know my history of the game I could just being use SmashBoards as a platform to get Tourney info, tips on a character, view current tier list, and etc. Let's not exempt our fellow Smashers.
2. We the Melee Community worked so hard get Melee on the Main stage at EVO?
Yet another statement dividing the Smash community. Why can't it be we helped a Smash title get back at EVO? We the Smash Community help get it back on the Main stage. Even as I was absent from the scene I still donated to have a Melee at EVO I didn't care what game it was I was going to donate for Smash. SSB has been getting heckled for years for not being a competitive fighting game from fans of Tekken, Street Fighter, MVC, DOA, MK, and etc. Now tell me why we as fellow SMASHERS are repeating history and mocking Brawl/Sm4sh as not being "competitive". I'm a fan of the series. Melee had more steam going forward because Top Players bashed Brawl to oblivion. It needs to end
3. 6 months is not enough time for the meta game to unfold?
Seriously? If that's the only reason why you want to keep Smash 4 out of EVO I'm ashamed. You really think Veteran Smashers are just going to lay an egg at EVO already having 6 months with the game. It seems like Melee Smashers want every AT figured out before Smash 4 takes the floor at EVO. If people are still upset about 2008 get over it because items won't happen again. They added 1v1 For Glory for crying out loud making an attempt to appeal to the competitive scene. The Smash Community has smart TOs that can figure out a rule set in 6 months C'mon.
4. Nintendo is trying a PR move and Capitalize on everything we worked hard for Melee.
Wow. First people were upset with the lack of Nintendo's involvement now when Nintendo wants to get involved its a problem. -_-
5. Smash 4 is not competitive and it's just Brawl 2.0
It's rather silly as the game hasn't even hit the Wii U yet. We don't know how DACUS will play out or C-Stick will play out. Besides that Sakurai is a freelance Director meaning every Smash was develop at different a studio making every game different. Adapt, Learn, and Conquer.
I already answered this question in a previous post. One of the guests who participated in the invitational spoke about it on their stream.How do you know they knew about PM and said anything about it at all?
I could explain it to you, but it would be a long post.I don't understand why their is so much hate towards a game you don't like/don't play.
I can answer that for you, based on mere observation: No.Can we all just stick together and support the smash game that get chosen and not argue with each other.
Character balance/variance =/= worth as a competitive gameSmash 4. Melee got like five characters that are constantly used. Let it die already.
Instead of just stating this, please try to give irrefutable supporting evidence, like I'm about to do. Logic really aids the credibility of your words.Character balance/variance =/= worth as a competitive game
It is a factor that offers depth to a game, more match-ups means more to learn and compete against.Character balance/variance =/= worth as a competitive game
1) How can we have the slightest idea of how balanced such a complex game is after less than a year out?No, balance doesn't automatically make a game competitive, but balance IS one of the most important aspects of a competitive game. Without balance, centralization occurs and it becomes necessary to use a particular set of techniques or characters to win. That's a poor state for a competitive game or sport. A game without balance doesn't deserve to be called competitive.
Not only it's not pointless... in cases like this it's necessary. The poll is about which game should be in next year's EVO: Melee or Smash4 (that there is even a debate about this is terrifying).p.s. Melee is still a good competitive game, but it's pointless to compare ANY two Smash games. This post is ONLY about Sm4sh, so let's please not go there.
Evo 2008 had items? why? how?Having Melee at EVO 2015 would be hype, but having Smash 4 at EVO will help it's metagame develop. Having BOTH Melee and Smash 4 will be amazing and brilliant, as we will see Pros preforming stellar matches for Melee but will turn tables when we see those players in Smash 4. All that I ask for is no items for Smash 4's Competitive Scene, and probably no Equipment attached to characters (Remember Brawl EVO 2008?).
Haha thats funny, how did brawl at EVO turnout dumbasBrawl was given a chance at EVO before so I think that Smash 4 should have a chance as well