Kon pretty much summed up my thoughts on this post. To be quite honest, I see where Kon is coming from in thinking that Kanty's vote onto Pokechu does come directly after his post. (though to Kanty's defense, he could have just agreed that Pokechu was the most inactive and therefore did not think the need to qualify their vote for such a reason)
Though the bigger issue I have is the wording I pointed out in Kon's post regarding the sudden defense. The reason I liked Kon's post was because Kanty's post gave me an odd vibe from how it seemed he had a much stronger opinion about Shish than it seems possible to have based on their posts. Shish did not have anything to suggest that their lynch would not give us information.
If Shish's lynch doesn't give valubable information to lynch, then why is Pokechu your new vote?
Kantrip
Neither lynch gives information so by your own logic, neither wagon matters at all for who goes. What at the time of this post made you want to sway the attention from Shish to Pokechu? As in, what is the key difference behind their two lynches from this post before Shish came in posting after it seems everyone realized the deadline was looming?
The justification for not lynching Shish reads as fake especially when you coat on the fact that Pokechu was the new vote with the exact justification behind the Shish wagon.
I could be reading intently into this, however, this is the first post in the game to give me those heeby jeeby vibes of dis-genuine content. That's basically my thoughts on the whole Kanty vote being odd.
More of a conversation I'd like to discuss if we had more daytime, but for the record of the day I'd like to
FoS: Kanty till I am able to get some conversations finished with him.