Alright, instead of wall-battling that post, I'm just going to respond to it freeform, since your whole 2029 can essentially be summed up as "Your stance change on Omni doesn't look sincere."
It is true that I had several issue with Omni's play on D1. I never stopped thinking that his play was bad, and I was mad that Omni got the gun on D2, because I still felt he was pretty scummy going into that Day. What caused me to give Omni that town lean was a combination of bigger fish to fry (my MM/Hando, Soup/Kary concepts) and the fact that Omni immediately undid his suspicion of Soup the moment he got the gun. While I had several problems with the way Omni chose to play D1, it's worth noting that the one thing that really struck me as decidedly scum over dumb, was the way he interacted with Soup, specifically. He listed Soup as his one scum read, while pushing for Dabuz. On D1, that screamed scumbuddy distancing to me. For that reason, going into D2, I would have expected scumOmni, having been king'd, to take that distancing even further. It would make sense for Omni to try to keep that Soup read consistent, and then gradually switch to some other player if he could. Instead, he just got a lot more careful. While it's not impossible for scum to try to be careful in that situation, I read it as more likely that Omni was simply weighing his options with more thought since he had become in charge of the execution. If he were scum, he would have taken advantage of the opportunity he found himself in.
The biggest part to my scum read on Omni was his relationship to Soup. The reason that didn't carry over in Day 2 is because the nature of the relationship between Omni and Soup changed on Day 2. The rest of my qualms with Omni could rightly be chalked up to bad play.