Corps phoenix
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2015
- Messages
- 257
Then tell me. What did you mistake that for, since you said it was a mixup.I don't care what you think is suitable or not, my first answer is true.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Then tell me. What did you mistake that for, since you said it was a mixup.I don't care what you think is suitable or not, my first answer is true.
The red is exactly what I am saying you thought he had information. To your second question, you would regardless of alignment. (Mafia would definitely not say "No, you may not") The part that is odd is that you were making sure people know he wasn't exactly cleared for giving a result on you, before he even gave results. How could you be sure he may or may not be town before he gave a result, and isn't that a given to each person that isn't you anyway, so why feel the need to point that out? What exactly about his name gave you that feeling (why did you come to that conclusion)?Actually, I was genuinely curious about the nature of the claim. "True Name" could refer to our normal accounts or our role IDs, and if I were Mafia, would I have really given Polish the opportunity to reveal my identity? The whole "he may or may not be town" bit was so that people wouldn't auto-confirm him if I corroborated that is ability is real.
I accidentally said "mislynch" because it was midnight, I can't operate well past 10:30 PM, I was thinking about the probability of Ran getting mislynched, and then since I was thinking about a mislynch, I accidentally entered "mislynch" instead of "lynch" into my post.Then tell me. What did you mistake that for, since you said it was a mixup.
Is this correct? You wouldn't lynch Mavman for it unless there was about to be a lynch? Does that make sense to you?I tend to agree with this. Mavman seems a tad scummy, but I'm not willing to go as far as to lynch him off of it yet unless there is about to be amislynchlynch.
Yeah, but I could've probably made the point that there could be a scum-alligned player with a demasked-based role. That would have guaranteed nothing would happen. I didn't put much thought into that possibility of the time, but I sure as heck woulda put more thought into that before saying "you're free to reveal whatever you want". In addition, I've played with someone that has claimed D0 cop before and tried to gambit me, so I was taking that into consideration.The red is exactly what I am saying you thought he had information. To your second question, you would regardless of alignment. (Mafia would definitely not say "No, you may not")
I felt the need to point that out because in a game with that amount of activity, Polish could have assumed automatic, complete thread control if someone assumed he was more townie for having a confirmed role.The part that is odd is that you were making sure people know he wasn't exactly cleared for giving a result on you, before he even gave results. How could you be sure he may or may not be town before he gave a result, and isn't that a given to each person that isn't you anyway, so why feel the need to point that out? What exactly about his name gave you that feeling (why did you come to that conclusion)?
I think that his opening could have been better if he started it on a useful topic, but it fueled discussion that could have possibly lead to a slip. The fact that you're bringing up points from that phase speaks to the fact it brought us out of RVS, so I think his opening was still mostly effective.Now that time has passed, what is your observation of his opening and discussion to you now?
Add a no before lynch and that is correct. I was too busy re-reading to go back and search for the original quote, so I just looked at the "about to be a mislynch" and assumed that I mixed up the mislynch vs lynch instead of the mis vs no. My B.Ah, ok. So let me fix the original quote for you:
Is this correct? You wouldn't lynch Mavman for it unless there was about to be a lynch? Does that make sense to you?
Can you please elaborate on this. Why wouldn't you go towards Mavman unless there was a no lynch?I tend to agree with this. Mavman seems a tad scummy, but I'm not willing to go as far as to lynch him off of it yet unless there is about to be amislynchlynchno lynch. In addition, if anyone votes for him at this point, he'll be at L-1 with 2 days to go in the phase; if he's town, scum could take advantage of that and get an easy mislynch.
It was more of the description. I didn't see anyone named Leviathan as a player. I forgot to search the #HBC tag (I think I said this early-game?), so I figured Leviathan was a role. In addition, because I didn't have reference to any of Polish's games, I didn't know that was his posting style was naturally pompous and middle-English, and I guess the way he spoke made me think he had a superiority complex.Important: What exactly about polish's name gave you that feeling of town or not town (why did you come to that conclusion)?
Because I wanted to avoid a NL; I would have voted Mavman and try to have someone hammer if we got to that point. He appeared townie-ish, but I would still take Barman's flip over Polish's and since he was already L-2 (Moro & MOD X 2), that was pretty much the only other possible slot to swing a lynch for that phase. Keep in mind I also thought that the phase was ending a day earlier than it actually did, so I was looking for possible compromise lynch routes if Ran didn't work out.Can you please elaborate on this. Why wouldn't you go towards Mavman unless there was a no lynch?
Ok. So why did you say this? Do you still believe this? If not, please explain what you think about the claim now.but I wouldn't say that the claim is a very town move either.
I do not believe this anymore. I said this initially because I was thinking purely of the fact that if the claim was in fact true (however unlikely it is), it could have possibly been fishing for more, real claims and if he were the unmasked-ability scum role (does scum include indie? If not, the scum/indie role), knowing everyone's IDs early-game could have provided him with a HUGE advantage. In hindsight, however, I don't think this is the case. Someone pointed out a while ago that such an ability would be unlikely because the original setup had unmasking as a death penalty, so I think Polish was just trying to generate as much conversation as possible, while still masking his/her identity with a safe and fake one.Ok. So why did you say this? Do you still believe this? If not, please explain what you think about the claim now.
I think that Barman played very townie D1, considered all viewpoints and had unique perspectives. Some of his D1 play made sense as scum, but you'd have to put it in a negative light to actually get anywhere, as there isn't much solid evidence against him. His absence D2, however, is very worrisome. It's one day before the phase ends and he's contributed pretty much nothing for today. Seeing as he's actually been active in his other game, that means he hasn't been too busy to play mafia and that gives a possibility of him coasting scum. While he has posted in-thread about giving input from BarMaven on the state of things, he's yet to actually come and do it. I'd be a little uncomfortable with you or Twitchy dying today (unless either of you do anything significantly scummy) as it would leave town with very little direction, you've both been very open on your opinions on the thread, and I've found your contrasting PoVs very useful in making my own opinions on the state of the thread. I think that Polish is still town-ish, Moro's tunneling for two days in a row and then absence since yesterday is worrisome, and Aqua has been getting too much credit for too little content. I really have to go to bed right now, but I'm comfortable enough with the lack of unmasked-based abilities based on the game setup to do this:Finally, what is your read on Maven?
Why have you immediately bent to Twitchy's claim without discussing it with him?Twitch, I can now understand why you have had the 'strong dislike' of my reads, especially Polish. I want you to understand that I was wrong, and want you to try to see from my point of view. Your sudden turn at the beginning of Day 2 was very odd. Cops usually leave crumbs, and not sudden unexplained read changes. Saying things like "It came to me..." just sounds like lies. Voting Morosemist on the basis of a 'blatant lie' seemed very weak. You, as cop, have played a weak cop game, and I wasn't expecting it. I would hope your future games, you play the cop role a bit more conservatively. Yet you are still the cop, and these two (Orange and Barman) are not even around much, Barman less so. I have come to my senses. I truly believed you and Polish were scum, and now truly realize that I was wrong. It happens.
Now please consider my two new avenues, which thankfully from realizing you and Polish are clear, I have found. I strongly feel you and Polish are wrong on Rose, and I have already explained why. I am willing to converse more. Yet time is of the essence! We have until tomorrow, Monday. I have been up all night constructing these posts. I feel we have something with these two cases. I want you to tell me what you think of my overall play, in addition to my push on you. Don't solely focus on that alone. I will most likely be going to sleep soon, unless anything keeps me stimulated. Good night. (Or morning)
Currently I'm catching up, but on initial thought I don't see why you've singled out Barman and Orange over Morose, who still hasn't redeemed himself from talking about anyone but Barman and then leaving once called on it.I simply assumed he thought it meant he was town, even though I already stated that a mafia godfather can reflect a result of VT as well.
I had asked him quite a bit of questions before unvoting, and started to move in the direction of Orange and Barman, because of their lack of presence. I wasn't going to be stubborn about it. I wanted to wait for others reactions, but it has been really slow. So I started re-reading in the case that he was telling the truth.
What are your thoughts on current events?
Ah, nix that ninja'd question then.Also, I was waiting on others thoughts before talking about Morose. So I quickly posted those thoughts because there is little time to digest everything, so I pushed it back. It's why I stayed up last night to make the two new cases. Deadline is tomorrow. So all my thoughts are on the table. Finally, Twitchy was on mobile so I wasn't able to get more of a discussion from him.
That's it.
You keep bringing this up. You are going to have to elaborate, and bring forth examples.but it seems like a reach from what I know of Maven)
I don't see why you think I'd default to Morose automatically though? You might find your answer as you catch up. I need you to give reads too, actually. I agree that I'd like to see reads from Morose. I want some tonight, since you are here.Currently I'm catching up, but on initial thought I don't see why you've singled out Barman and Orange over Morose, who still hasn't redeemed himself from talking about anyone but Barman and then leaving once called on it.
Read the first 3 pages of Gheb's ongoing game, wordsearch for "****garden", then skip ahead to where he's Un-CC'd Town Tracker.You keep bringing this up. You are going to have to elaborate, and bring forth examples.
I'm talking about Gheb's game, wherein you should be looking for a more accurate read of Maven.That is odd. OP says this is an closed setup. Where did you get that from?
1. There is no 'wifom' that will stop people from guessing a person is lying about their role or not. It's the same as any standard game. If this were true, no one would know to consider a town cop claim to be genuine or not. Why would Twitchy consider that he may be night killed if 'scum might not know if he's a pr or not'. Frankly, Maven's claim that scum won't know is bull****. Orange stating he believes this, is bull, especially after one post.
Can you explain what you're getting at in this post?1. There is no 'wifom' that will stop people from guessing a person is lying about their role or not. It's the same as any standard game. If this were true, no one would know to consider a town cop claim to be genuine or not. Why would Twitchy consider that he may be night killed if 'scum might not know if he's a pr or not'. Frankly, Maven's claim that scum won't know is bull****. Orange stating he believes this, is bull, especially after one post.
My point is that there isn't a way for anyone to 'not know'. Like I said, this is the same as a standard game. So him claiming VT here isn't any different then claiming in VT in another game. Otherwise there is a mechanic I don't know about that everyone seems to assume is there. If I'm wrong, please do tell me why they can't know. Yet I've already explained how mafia can narrow down the list for PR's in normal games, and that shouldn't change here. Can I have some reads from you, Aqua?2. Mafia can't know if I'm really a vanilla townie or a PR whose just claiming to be one, therefore this discussion can't really narrow anything down
If you could.Aqua, I'll get to that in a moment.
So you haven't read the thread and put me at L-2. How considerate.Thats a lot of thread. I haven't read anything since I last posted but the thing aqua tagged me in. Aqua, Soup has informed me I misinterpreted the result -- Polish isn't necessarily townie.
Now then, we are not no-lynching today, but I'm not going to read up/make a big post right now. I'll do that IRL tomorrow. But for now, ima VOTE: Orange.
Somebody tag me if something really major happens or if you need me immediately... Other than that I'll deal with recent happenings in the morning. If orange is a mislynch, body corps for me. I really don't like his arguments/if orange is a ML he's scum.
I agree that the "mislynch" situation doesn't look too good, but refusal to help? How can you say that while I've re-read the thread and started to comment on new content while half the thread isn't caught up yet?Well. At the moment I'd like the lynch to be Orange or Morose. There's been a few too many slips and outright refusals to help from Orange for me to feel comfortable keeping him as newb town. I can swallow the early game Polish name-claim thing as newness, but it doesn't feel like his responses to your "mislynch" questioning are truthful (I don't really care if he mistyped mislynch, but I do care that he seems to want to hide it).
I agree with this sentiment.I also don't believe what you're interpreting from Morose should be considered town, I still see a player railing against the slot that he perceived as the worst and safest to push, not scummiest; but he's been quite hard to do anything with considering he's not here.
I'd also sincerely appreciate Polish making a return and confirming my ID before I get lynched so that town has more to go off of tomorrow.I'd also sincerely appreciate Polish making a return and confirming or de-confirming the Twitchy claim.