I don't see a point in having a pro-bracket. The pot is going to be $50 spread over 3 people. We might as well just money match each other a lot. And there's absolutely no way a doubles pro-bracket would be viable.This is an interesting idea, and I think something similar might be good in Norcal too. But I'd like the ranked people to be able to compete too, just more among themselves, so here are a few ideas for formats:
-Just 2 separate non-interacting brackets. Problems are that most ranked people like the warm-up match against the unranked, and also unranked people like to get the experience of playing the top players.
-Amateur bracket plays first, top X play in pro bracket. Only problem with this is it deprives the ranked people of a few tourney sets. This might be solved by:
-2 sets of pools, a set of ranked players to determine seeding in the pro bracket, which would have a few slots open for the top X people from a set of pools unranked players. The seeding is fairly well-established among the ranked people though, so having them play pools might be just busywork.
Again I think this is a cool idea and it will encourage more people to step up their game and also maybe more people might show up to tourneys if they know they aren't getting auto-***** first round.
The second option sounds pretty good, except again, the lack of entrants in the pro bracket is going to be a problem. How does the money get distributed? Do the people who win the amateur bracket get money, or do they simply play to get into the pro bracket? If the former, there is a huge lack of cash available for the winners of the pro bracket, giving less importance to the pro bracket and suggesting that it isn't a serious or official competition.
If the latter, then we would need pools to create a complete tournament experience, the way they did at SCSA (which I thought had a good system), but I don't see that many people attending, at least for the first one. The entry fee would most likely be $5 across the board, with no real difference except that the pros play less and are guaranteed top placings while the amateurs feel more accomplished since they move on from a bracket.
My aim is to get a lot of people to play, by distributing money across more placings. They'll get a chance to play more Finals sets and win back some cash as well as risk less in terms of entry fee. I think the broader pot split and the chance to win a tournament is a better incentive than simply moving them to another bracket where they will get ***** the same as any other tournament. Ranked people can survive one week without a tournament.
Thanks for the support though, it's good to know THE Sheridan is helping out.