Handorin
Smash Hero
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2005
- Messages
- 6,013
Youre flipping burgers, he's at kinkos straight flippn copies.unvote ronike vote marshy
YOU"RE TOO FLIPPY FLOPPPY
-
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Mafia Milkyway Sleepover - Serial Killer wins (with a Gold Metal for Mafia)
- Thread starter Rockin
- Start date
I vote on sex.
lawls
lawls
Spring break started and I'm back on the net! So yeah, I'm against no lynch as usual and no joke vote for now.
smashbot226
Smash Master
CAPTAIN SYRUP comes to mind. So does Mother Brain.
I hope it's the Captain N version.
"DUN GIF ME ANY YO' LIP BOAH!"
Yaya
Smash Champion
I was reluctant, but what ev.
I'm in.
EDIT TO AVOID CONFUSION: I mean, Replacement.
I'm in.
EDIT TO AVOID CONFUSION: I mean, Replacement.
Okay, you're in the replacement spot.
smashbot226
Smash Master
Rockin, your avatar has distracted me from doing my homework.
Smashbot, did you respond to this? Marshy pretty clearly illuminated a contradiction in your vote logic. I would stand by the fact that you said one thing and did another.
Let's see how I do for a first timer...
VOTES (It takes 7 votes out of 13 players)
Tom - Handorin (1)
Marshy - Mr. Lombardi , Jungle (2)
Smashbot - Marshy (1)
KK - Smashbot (1)
Omis - KK, Omis (2, technically >>;; )
Medi - Tom (1)
VOTES (It takes 7 votes out of 13 players)
Tom - Handorin (1)
Marshy - Mr. Lombardi , Jungle (2)
Smashbot - Marshy (1)
KK - Smashbot (1)
Omis - KK, Omis (2, technically >>;; )
Medi - Tom (1)
is this a sign of things to come in the batman game? :o
rockin you have smashbot voting twice. he unvoted me and is now on karthik
you also have jungle voting twice when it should just be on me and not ronike i think
Sorry about that Marshy. I knew that, but I forgot to make the last changes.
It's been fixed now. I promise to do better on next result.
It's been fixed now. I promise to do better on next result.
I FORGIVE YOU
What does that even mean? You could justify a vote on anybody with that
Mr.Lombardi34
Smash Ace
Unvote Vote: Smashboot
I find the bandwagon reasoning and the bolded statement above to be rather suspicious.
I find the bandwagon reasoning and the bolded statement above to be rather suspicious.
Smashbot, I gotta agree you did bandwagon with Tom's reasoning for a joke vote as your own reason, and that bolded statement is pretty strange...Think you got some responding to do.(On the other hand, not with the vote on him yet due to the results of his time in Omis' game)
Handorin
Smash Hero
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2005
- Messages
- 6,013
No johns.
I'd also like to know what you mean by your statement. Did Karthik do something in another game or are you just saying things for no reason?
smashbot226
Smash Master
Yeah, sorry I couldn't get to this earlier, but my cousin wanted me to play Halo Wars.
I figured that a move like immediately saying that a no-lynch is bad is scummy to me. Also, your "justification" of saying it in Omis's mafia game and THEN turning out to be doc is not even proof.
Also, I'm voting Karthik because- well, is he likely going to prove beneficial to town? AT ALL? Given his previous involvements in some earlier Mafia games, I doubt it. It's sort of like killing off the "slow" kid.
smashbot226
Smash Master
Basically I mean Karthik's the weak link.
But you're working with PURELY odds here, no input from him at all this game works into your suggestion. So you're not hunting for scum, you're just picking off K_King. The odds that he is town-aligned are a bit over double that is he mafia aligned, and the odds that he is a town power role are a bit under the same that he is mafia aligned. If he's townie, we haven't eliminated a foe. He can't screw us up much as a townie, because his vote is the same as all of ours. If he is a cop or doctor, we've eliminated a great ally in his role period. You really wanna work simple odds and eliminate whom you call "the slow kid" for not doing anything wrong at all?
Totally unrelated. I saved this avatar before Gotham started and I've just been waiting to use it. It's awesome.
is this a sign of things to come in the batman game? :o
oh
unvote: Mediocre
vote: smashbot226
unvote: Mediocre
vote: smashbot226
smashbot226
Smash Master
I'm working with what little we know- we all are. I'm just stating my opinion, and I'm choosing K_King because even if he WAS a helpful role like doctor or cop, then he may be too, for a lack of a better word, inexperienced, for the role. It'd be like telling a toddler to guard the president.
And those odds are purely calculations- that's still a noticeable percentage that K_King is scum. You could say the same about anyone here. And yes, I would eliminate the slow kid, but not for doing nothing wrong, but for likely proving to be an inadequate town supporter.
Charles Darwin and his Theory of Evolution states the idea of the Survival of the Fittest- K_King is the weakest. He may prove a hindrance for the rest of the game if he's let alive. If he does something of value before the next lynch, I'll change my mind.
Having an inexperienced cop or doc is better than having none at all.
As for going for someone who the town thinks is inexperienced, town did that twice in Omis' game with you and karthik and paid twice for it.
I also don't see how you can say that you'll change your mind if he does something of value before the next lynch when you are pushing for his lynch right now. There's really nothing he can say in his defense other than "I'll try to do better this time".
As for going for someone who the town thinks is inexperienced, town did that twice in Omis' game with you and karthik and paid twice for it.
I also don't see how you can say that you'll change your mind if he does something of value before the next lynch when you are pushing for his lynch right now. There's really nothing he can say in his defense other than "I'll try to do better this time".
unvote smashbot
Because I'm not sure how suspicious that really is after what happened last game. Plus everybody who's posted since post #89 has only offered thoughts on smashbot and nothing else. getting too focused on one person
Because I'm not sure how suspicious that really is after what happened last game. Plus everybody who's posted since post #89 has only offered thoughts on smashbot and nothing else. getting too focused on one person
Ronike
Smash Ace
- Joined
- May 14, 2006
- Messages
- 612
Smashbot, I really strongly disklike KK prolly just as much as the next guy. But you have to admit, killing him this early is kinda dumb... I mean, he hasn't really contributed yet. He obviously has been keeping up with Omis' game (as he offered to break some rules to help us...), so maybe he's gotten better! Who knows, maybe he's some kinda genius that will turn out to be better than any of us in the end. And consider this too: What kind of message does it send to new players if we just continuously kill off this ew one? If we ever want new players, we need to be nice to new ones...
Mr.Lombardi34
Smash Ace
Marshy: I can see that the discussion is focusing solely on Smashbot right now, but he really seems the most suspicious right now. His behavior, to me, screams "Amateur Scum!" Trying to vote out Karthik so quickly seems like something scum would do, as the quicker the day ends, the less chance they have of giving off scum tells/getting random lynched
My vote stands.
My vote stands.
I'd like to hear what Karthik has to say on the whole matter. Any chance you'll change your play or attempt to do better? This is coming from someone who doesn't know what happened and is going purely off what has been said in this thread so far. I don't think Smashbot has much of a point, but I'm wondering what your response to the current situation is.
Aye.
I'd like to take this opportunity to say that we could have a serial killer in this game, so vigilantes shouldn't shoot night 1. One reason is that odds are you will hit town, but the other one is that it would be nice to know if we have a serial killer.
I'd like to take this opportunity to say that we could have a serial killer in this game, so vigilantes shouldn't shoot night 1. One reason is that odds are you will hit town, but the other one is that it would be nice to know if we have a serial killer.
Omis
my friends were skinny
The serial killer could just skip killing day 1 to make it seem like there wasnt a serial killer. Then day 2 he could resume to make it seem like we have a dumb vig. I agree that the vig shouldnt kill day 1 though.
About what? I guess you want my opinions on the whole Karthik/smashbot thing?
I think smashbot's vote on Karthik King is dumb. I also don't think it's scummy. I think it's just smashbot being smashbot.
Moreover, it seems like it's a waste of time. Obviously, the majority of players disagree with him, and there's no new information or evidence he can bring up to change their minds. Continuing his argument for lynching Karthik King at this point is an exercise in futility.
Really, I don't think either of them are scummy or deserving of a lynch, and I don't think there's much room for growth discussing it. Unless it evolves into something more quite quickly, I think we'd be better off moving on.
I think that usually, the serial killer is required to kill once a night.
I'm sure there are exceptions, but that's generally the way it works.
Agreed Omis, it would be very easy for the sk to not kill n1, so it doesn't mean all that much if we only have one kill... Also, Marshy, I agree that conversation has turned to smashbot, but really the comment he made "we find out if he's mafia and if not we have one less foe to deal with" sounds like a scumslip(as the only ones with one less foe if he's not mafia are mafia or killers), and I would like to hear from him on that... I'm not sure if he's actually anti-town or if it was just an attempt at a joke from last game, I just want to hear his justification for it.
Also, I would like to add, I agree with Medi that there's not much he could argue trying to justify a lynch on Karthik, I just want him to explain the comment I mentioned above and what he meant by it
No, the serial killer is a role that more often than not (read: almost always) has to kill each night.
Vote: Hando
For pressure voting Medi asking him to say something when he hasn't said anything himself all game.
For pressure voting Medi asking him to say something when he hasn't said anything himself all game.
Handorin
Smash Hero
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2005
- Messages
- 6,013
This is true. SKs always have to kill, since it's their objective to be the last one left.
So ya, I agree with Tom. Vig shots tonight arnt that great. I bet in a game this size there is at least one.
Handorin
Smash Hero
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2005
- Messages
- 6,013
I somehow missed this. I guess I didnt refresh the page.
Crapz. I just look back, and I guess the post I made before church didnt post.
Basically it was:
I don't agree with lynching KK at the moment. He hasnt done anything to help or appear scummy, so the only reason -to- lynch him would be because he hasnt said anything really. (Which I dont really agree with now).