Sushi3
Smash Apprentice
Note: I'm still fairly new to the metagame, so correct me if I make any innacurate statements, and please don't flame me or write satirical/sarcastic comments.
What I've generally understood about low tiers, is that they have nightmarish matchups against most of the high tier characters (obviously) but can be a threat against any player with less matchup experience with low tiers. While most, if not all of these characters are unviable in consistently placing well at high levels of play, some are hindered by a few select horrible matchups or issues rather than several. They could actually have decent matchups against the other characters. It's these low tiers that I believe would have greater potential as secondaries, and these are the characters I'm going to focus on.
I'll start with an example. The ice climbers are infamously known for their cgs, but face snake as a nightmare matchup, and can still be overcome by opponents who can camp on platforms. You might already be thinking "ICs are not low tier lol" but I still think they are underused and underrated. Suppose you main MK, a character with a good air game, and your opponent decides to CP FD game 2. This would be a good time to whip out those ICs and render your opponent opponent unable to camp. Had you mained ICs, your opponent would have probably banned FD right away. (That doesn't mean you shouldn't main them though)
Personally, I've noticed that Luigi has some horrible matchups with the top tiers, mixed in with some decent ones. As a diddy main, I generally use Luigi as a secondary because he is middle/low tier and also because diddy does well against Luigi's nightmare matchups (D3, Gdubs, MK, Marth sorta). Oh, and also because I got him as 2nd from Ook's little quiz . I believe that Luigi is high tier material, but suffers from these select matchups that are mitigated by my main.
What are your views on using low tiers as secondaries? Do you have a low tier secondary that accompanies your main fairly well?
PS: On a side note, Ook, you should definitely modify that quiz. I know you intended it to be just for fun, but it's a great asset to anyone searching for a main, so the more accurate it is, the better. (How can snake have no mindgames? )
What I've generally understood about low tiers, is that they have nightmarish matchups against most of the high tier characters (obviously) but can be a threat against any player with less matchup experience with low tiers. While most, if not all of these characters are unviable in consistently placing well at high levels of play, some are hindered by a few select horrible matchups or issues rather than several. They could actually have decent matchups against the other characters. It's these low tiers that I believe would have greater potential as secondaries, and these are the characters I'm going to focus on.
I'll start with an example. The ice climbers are infamously known for their cgs, but face snake as a nightmare matchup, and can still be overcome by opponents who can camp on platforms. You might already be thinking "ICs are not low tier lol" but I still think they are underused and underrated. Suppose you main MK, a character with a good air game, and your opponent decides to CP FD game 2. This would be a good time to whip out those ICs and render your opponent opponent unable to camp. Had you mained ICs, your opponent would have probably banned FD right away. (That doesn't mean you shouldn't main them though)
Personally, I've noticed that Luigi has some horrible matchups with the top tiers, mixed in with some decent ones. As a diddy main, I generally use Luigi as a secondary because he is middle/low tier and also because diddy does well against Luigi's nightmare matchups (D3, Gdubs, MK, Marth sorta). Oh, and also because I got him as 2nd from Ook's little quiz . I believe that Luigi is high tier material, but suffers from these select matchups that are mitigated by my main.
What are your views on using low tiers as secondaries? Do you have a low tier secondary that accompanies your main fairly well?
PS: On a side note, Ook, you should definitely modify that quiz. I know you intended it to be just for fun, but it's a great asset to anyone searching for a main, so the more accurate it is, the better. (How can snake have no mindgames? )