You might want to cool it a bit, nobody's threatening your human rights here.
Actually that's not in the slightest what I was talking about. You clearly didn't read my post very carefully at all. I cited Mario breathing fire because that's an ability Bowser has always had, and Link using dark magic because that's an ability Ganon always has. The point that I was making is that it wouldn't fit to give these moves to the heroes of these games when they originate from the antagonists, no more than it would fit to borrow moves from the many antagonists of Punch-Out. The Villager using Balloon Fighter's move is a reference to the fact that balloon fight is available as a minigame in the first Animal Crossing. In itself, the Balloon Fight main character would not have enough to work as a fighter, as there isn't much you can do with the way he behaves in his own game. But as just one of many moves to the villager, one that isn't too much of a stretch on the villager's "use a lot of random ****" moveset design, it fits well.
The Villagers in animal crossing don't really have characterization. The whole point is that they are you, and you control their every move. You're not really the protagonist or the antagonist, and neither of these exist through characters separate to you. There certainly isn't an antagonist who wears a helmet and floats around on Balloons. Little Mac on the other hand does have some established character. He is the protagonist and the various fighters are the antagonists. They act as bad guys do, they cheat, they showboat, and they badmouth Little Mac (well, most of them at least, Glass Joe is pretty complacent.) This contrasts Little Mac who is a modest, clean fighter at a constant and obvious disadvantage. It's outside the realm of his character to do many of the things that Punch-Out's opponents do, some of the things being suggested as additions to his moveset. It's not just that Mac never used that stuff, it's that he wouldn't use that stuff, because it's not who he is.
Do you understand now what I was getting at?