@
Nimious
I
do hope you'll explain in great detail just what you mean by this little remark of yours. Try not to say anything silly while everyone's paying attention.
I was going to ignore all of this scrub talk until I read this:
I'll give you two chances to defend yourself first though. One, explain what you meant by this. Two, have you ever played in an offline tourney with more than 30 people in it?
elitism
noun elit·ism \ā-ˈlē-ˌti-zəm, i-, ē-\
Definition of ELITISM
1: leadership or rule by an elite
2
: the selectivity of the elite;
especially : snobbery <
elitism in choosing new members>
3
: consciousness of being or belonging to an elite
—
elit·ist \-ˈlē-tist\
noun or adjective
Just to make sure we're all on the same page that definition is from the Merriam-Webster dictionary.
Being a Link main it's difficult to be an elitist when it comes to Smash. This is a not character that's in the upper echelons of the tier list and as we just went over is not achieving even decent results competitively. You play Link because you like playing Link and not for other ulterior motives.
As for the rest of the definition of being an elite, the closest thing to that here are you holdovers from Brawl and possible earlier and that's in the social context. I don't pretend at all to know you and I certainly don't try to curry your favour.
The only thing silly is that you two are questioning me on my belief that there isn't elitism here.
As for your second inquiry, yes I have played in offline tournaments with more than 30 people in it. It is difficult not to considering the typical weekly is 30 - 40 people. I compete as often as I can with the last tournament that I played in being on July 11th.
Results:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10101212369055706&set=gm.1649598545253033&type=1&theater
It's clear you've never been put in that situation. Not surprising, judging by the way you seem to praise theorycraft and scoff at in person tournament jitters and raw emotion.
I've been put into this situation just last week. I had to play the Toronto player who had just knocked out one of the top Ottawa PR players. You probably saw her at EVO if you watched the Smash 4 portion as she's in the front row as staff. In any case the TO for Smash 4 came up to me and told me no pressure but she's a big deal.
http://www.twitch.tv/613smash/b/677231535?t=3h31m26s
Yes I was nervous but I asked the people in the scene who I should play and how and ultimately that would be Rosalina and Luma for her expected Jigglypuff.
However I'm only nervous to the point it affects me up until the match starts. It's counter productive otherwise. If I had the opportunity to play at EVO I would have been even less nervous. Where as at ECHO I had a chance of winning at EVO I would just be happy being there and playing.
As for raw emotion, I've seen that from the crushing losses but also experienced it when I had my first tournament win.
Also Lawz your idea that I "praise theorycraft" most likely comes from the fact that I played along with Catana and Dukel's remarks on my suggestion to start every match with a bomb. I only went into theory because of the scenarios they outlined that it supposedly would not work in. In reality I've been starting every match with a bomb and depending on the match-up with or without a jump and finding it safe.
On Dukel's part especially, he was very much wrong and because I've explained to him why I now come across as a "theorycrafter". That's a bit funny but there was no need for the theory when you have the experience.
But no, I don't "praise theorycraft" and yes I've been in those situations.
The real issue here is that I'm not as tactful as you all would like.