Snagrio
Shiny Lord
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2014
- Messages
- 3,379
- Location
- Underground or in the air
- NNID
- WingedFish64
- 3DS FC
- 4081-5821-0404
Apparently there was over 40 guests on this page and now there's just 14. What was that random influx all about?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Lol, too bad Microsoft owns Conker.Lol if "Rare" era rep was a t hing i would so take Conker over K Rool.
If the relevance argument wasn't a factor why do we have characters like Greninja and Rosalina?I hate the relevance argument, if it was so important, Why do we have Mr.Game&Watch or ROB?
Yup. So K. Rool was in Brawl after allHas anyone else ever noticed that in Brawl, one of the names that appears when you press the "Random Name" button when naming a custom stage is KROOL?
Because Sakuria saw the potential in their moveset.If the relevance argument wasn't a factor why do we have characters like Greninja and Rosalina?
And that same logic cant be used for game and watch and rob? (Obviously they repersent the "Retro" part of nintendo but thats beside the point here)Because Sakuria saw the potential in their moveset.
Pokemon tends to get a rep from the latest game, and Rosalina has been around for quite some time now already and has become quite the popular character in the Mario franchise. Relevance has nothing to do with either one's inclusion. Greninja was chosen to promote the latest game and because Sakurai liked his design, not because he's "relevant."If the relevance argument wasn't a factor why do we have characters like Greninja and Rosalina?
You're contradicting yourself. Now you're saying its about moveset potential, before it was about relevance. Which is it?And that same logic cant be used for game and watch and rob? (Obviously they repersent the "Retro" part of nintendo but thats beside the point here)
Yes but then we have characters like Lucina and potentially Dark Pit who are both recent but didn't have any effort put into them. So it can kinda go both ways here.Because Sakuria saw the potential in their moveset.
Are you sure this relates to the point you are trying to promote or persuade people of? R.O.B. and Mr. Game and Watch were not chosen just because they were Retro, but because they had moveset potential, same as the new members of the Nintendo Family.And that same logic cant be used for game and watch and rob? (Obviously they repersent the "Retro" part of nintendo but thats beside the point here)
Both were added due to popularity, but were not planned at all to be separate characters. Lucina was very popular in Awakening, but was originally a reskin. Same with Dark Pit. Medusa or Hades, the next characters people would think of from KI, have more than enough potential for fully original movesets and wouldn't look the same as fully separate characters, hence why Dark Pit got in instead.Yes but then we have characters like Lucina and potentially Dark Pit who are both recent but didn't have any effort put into them. So it can kinda go both ways here.
Lucina was originally an Alternate Costume for Marth, but she was also Intelligent Systems favorite character from the Awakening game.Yes but then we have characters like Lucina and potentially Dark Pit who are both recent but didn't have any effort put into them. So it can kinda go both ways here.
All i was saying is if "Relvance" wasn't a factor characters like Greninja or Rosalina wouldn't be in. No one requested those characters. Hell what abotu WFT? No one requested her was well. There in because their relevant and it's a perfect marketing oppertunity.Pokemon tends to get a rep from the latest game, and Rosalina has been around for quite some time now already and has become quite the popular character in the Mario franchise. Relevance has nothing to do with either one's inclusion. Greninja was chosen to promote the latest game and because Sakurai liked his design, not because he's "relevant."
In fact, Greninja can hardly be considered relevant. He's recent, but he wasn't even close to the most significant Pokemon in X/Y, he wasn't even actively promoted that much at all.
You're contradicting yourself. Now you're saying its about moveset potential, before it was about relevance. Which is it?
Just because relevancy doesn't matter doesn't mean we can't have more recent characters as well as older ones.If the relevance argument wasn't a factor why do we have characters like Greninja and Rosalina?
I am CLEARLY aware of Lucina originally being a reskin. Do I still think Sakurai should've given her a spot just because of popularity? Hell no!Both were added due to popularity, but were not planned at all to be separate characters. Lucina was very popular in Awakening, but was originally a reskin. Same with Dark Pit. Medusa or Hades, the next characters people would think of from KI, have more than enough potential for fully original movesets and wouldn't look the same as fully separate characters, hence why Dark Pit got in instead.
I'd definitely be down for a vehicle character in Smash.In one of leaked photos there is a Larry Koopa in the clown car pic which means that has a good possibility of happening. I know a lot of people have already crossed of the great King K Rool, but Sakurai still has some surprises for us yet. He won't let a leak get him down especially if that isn't all the characters as I expect it isn't.
Arbitrary "retro" label. Which we'll be able to apply to K. Rool if he's not in this time, mind you, so he automatically forgoes all this crappy scrutiny of "relevance" in the future, heh.I hate the relevance argument, if it was so important, Why do we have Mr.Game&Watch or ROB?
Well, the Duck Hunt Dog is another example of a "retro" character (which is an arbitrary classification anyway), so people will argue that he was added because he was old, and that it doesn't affect the "relevance" argument.
Ah, "Retro". The most arbitrary and bull**** criteria that the speculation community keeps spouting out despite barely understanding what it even means without constantly contradicting themselves.Duck Hunt Dog is okay because he's arbitrarily 'retro'.
K. Rool hasn't appeared at all, villain or not. That's not even remotely equivalent.A little something for all you nay-Sayers:
King Dedede hasn't been a legitimate villain in the Kirby series since Super Star, and even then he was clearly outclassed by Marx. Super Star Ultra was a remake, but still the final boss in the true arena was Marx Soul, not the Dedede, yet he is in Brawl and the new smash.
My point is that even if a villain hasn't been a true villain in a long time they still can be in and classified as a villain.
I appreciate your analogy, but doesn't it seem out of place? Hasn't King Dedede been in every Kirby game even when he was not the main villain?A little something for all you nay-Sayers:
King Dedede hasn't been a legitimate villain in the Kirby series since Super Star, and even then he was clearly outclassed by Marx. Super Star Ultra was a remake, but still the final boss in the true arena was Marx Soul, not the Dedede, yet he is in Brawl and the new smash.
My point is that even if a villain hasn't been a true villain in a long time they still can be in and classified as a villain.
wut?King K. Out would be a fun AT, firing lasers all over the place.
Trust me, you are not the only one here worried for that.I hate to be negative but am I the only one here thats afraid the Dk series will get barely acknowledged at all...
That leaked roster is so neglectful of Zelda, Dk, Metroid, and Star Fox that it hurts..Trust me, you are not the only one here worried for that.
Gotta wonder... it is interesting... I... don't want to get my hopes up, although I honestly do believe DKR2 is in development. As for K. Rool in Smash, I still think its quite likely. I'm definitely not as confident as I once was, but I think he's more likely in than he's not. Johnknight's roster explanation is quite good and detailed, explaining that its quite likely we would have the roster expand from 8 columns into 10, as every game to date has expanded by two columns (although in 64 the slots were shown from the start).Have you heard something about Grant Kirkhope's help for us? I recently posted a K. Rool messahe in his Facebook wall and he said nothing. I think he read it but didn't want to say anything, because after a few weeks I posted a video of DK64 and he liked it and even he commented the video. The same thing is happening with David Wise, some people has asked him about Diddy Kong Racing 2 and he says nothing, there is something strange in those guys recently, maybe Nintendo is planning something big for DK and we dont know yet.
If you think, they brought David Wise last year and announced him at E3 2013, Nintendo knew that we wanted David Wise so much, and why then they wouldn't have known that we have been waiting for K. Rool also? Think that David Wise is as important or even more important to DKC than K. Rool, he is the spirit of DKC because of his music!
Meowth, Balloon Fighter, Mach Rider, Excite Biker, Lip, Tingle, cut characters at allAnd we know the history behind characters once planned and didnt make it and then are in the next game
Zelda doesn't really need a newcomer imo. Though Ganondorf should have gotten his own moves. Still being a Falcon clone is inexcusable.That leaked roster is so neglectful of Zelda, Dk, Metroid, and Star Fox that it hurts..
Lip... Yeah, I'd love for Lip to be playable... ugh...Meowth, Balloon Fighter, Mach Rider, Excite Biker, Lip, Tingle, cut characters at all
Pokemon is not even trying to represent its 'core cast.' If it is, the roster would be:Zelda has its full core cast, although Impa would round it out nicely. Mewtwo should come back to round out the core Pokemon cast (Pikachu, Charizard, Mewtwo, and Lucario), Star Fox just needs Wolf to maintain its core cast, Kirby has its core cast, Rosalina and Bowser Jr. are rising stars to round out the Mario core cast nicely... DK just needs K. Rool and Dixie Kong, while Metroid needs Ridley to round out their core casts as well.
Well, I was mainly talking about the most promoted characters. Pokemon is more iffy on that subject, really.Pokemon is not even trying to represent its 'core cast.' If it is, the roster would be:
Pikachu, Charizard, Sceptile, Greninja, Lucario, Mewtwo, Pokemon Trainer.
I'm sorry, but your assertion to the main cast has nothing to do with any core players of Pokemon other than the vanity popularity queens. That would be the same as saying the core players of Zelda are Link, Zelda, Midna, Sheik, Ghirahim, Tingle, and Groose.