I was not planning on blocking you because I am interested in the stuff you have to say as much as anyone else on this thread. I do understand where you're coming from on a lot of the cases but to be frank it's not nice to see even when I share largely similar tastes in characters to you. I haven't yet had the misfortune of you being vocal about characters I care about but there will be people who care about the characters you hate as well as K Rool who would like to use this thread. It's not about censorship either. There is a way to voice your opinion without it coming across as inflammatory as it can do, and there is a very distinct difference between raising your points in a discussion and spontaneously bursting into vitriol about other characters. Surely extolling the perceived virtues of your choices rather than attacking the perceived flaws of other peoples' (with no prompting, I might add) is the adult thing to do?
Fair enough.
- I agree on Ganon; but his portrayal is an unfortunate circumstance. He was made that way in Melee to try bring him in because he was so popular in polls and has remained that way due to Sakurai not wanting to displease fans of his moveset (which there are). None of this points to disliking villains though; and I remember (though cannot source) a quote saying Sakurai quite enjoyed Ganondorf.
- Unfortunately Wolf is gone. However I think you'll find the reason is probably being cut due to time constraints as much as anything else. He's not completely gone yet either; wait and see if his ballot support is ignored first.
- Regarding K Rool: Not even Bowser was in Smash 64 so you cannot expect K Rool there. Melee happened during the Rare buyout so not even Diddy was used there. Diddy was then added in Brawl who was arguably a more important request to meet during Brawl. The Smash 4 absence is the most difficult to explain and in my opinion probably due to the fact he hasn't appeared in quite a while but he's not out of the running yet and has a costume if nothing else, which in my opinion was pre-ballot.
- I don't like Wario's moveset change either but this is a very minor thing I can't see fairly implying Sakurai hates villains.
- Porky is from a dead franchise. How many people who buy Smash genuinely know who even Ness is?
- Ridley has been done to death. In Sakurai's defense I believe that the guy does actually go out of his way to try include Ridley in some capacity because he knows how much fans want him, even if all he gets back from it is anger that Ridley isn't playable.
- F-Zero is dead and wasn't that popular when it was still going. Sakurai noted this fact during Falcon's reveal and it's been stated that characters from a series with no future are lower priority.
-Not touching 64 because Smash wasn't really established as a thing back then however, King Rool was absent from Melee, Brawl, and this game's main roster. In that time DK has thrived, died and rose again. I don't see why he has never made an appearance despite being a big as Bowser or Ganon.
-That was the only thing that connected Wario to the Wario Land games, take that away you denounce all of that.
-So is Lucas yet he was is Brawl and came back in this game due to fan demand. A franchise being dead has nothing to do with anything.
-I don't believe him on Ridley.
-On F-Zero all I can say is, alright.
Regardless of whether you think they add, they certainly don't detract. Excluding those three wouldn't have got any additional characters. You still have the same number of unique characters to play as. Wanting them removed full stop is selfish, no two ways about it. If you want them changed that's a different matter but losing them gets you literally nothing in return.
I wouldn't have a problem if the characters were different and or better than the originals the problem is Dr. Mario is bad, Lucina is similar, Dark Pit is horrible and I love how Medusa got passed up for him. Also in Dark Pit's case as well as all the others if you're not going to represent them properly don't do it at all. So in short the doctrine he adopted and applied to Ridley should be used for other characters. The clones look like fluff, fluff is bad.
I actually do believe him. The proportions of Ridley and Charizard are very different for starters. And the proportions are always the stuff that has been important. As for the other characters you've mentioned, they've all got fine proportions and in a lot of cases have space for a lot of creative liberties. You've already mentioned disliking Ganondorf; do you want Ridley to end up that way?
See if this were 2010 I would have believed him too, but after receiving a BFA in 3D modeling, I don't. Ridley and Charizard aren't that different the only difference is that Charizard is fat and Ridley is anorexic. Take away the belly and some inches off the neck by bending it, and you're there.
At the end of the day, the thread is the King K. Rool thread, not "classic villains united against popular recent series". It's about supporting King K. Rool for Sm4sh, not hating on the rest. Why can't we discuss him? What sorts of inspiration would you like on his moveset? Are there any specific design choices you'd like to avoid? There are plenty of things to discuss that I haven't seen your perspective on and which I'd miss by simply hitting the block button.
Again fair enough. I love Kaptain K Rool, The blunderbuss, I feel is very important. Also personally the look of the costume is how King K Rool should look, however I personally feel that nostrils should be added because that just makes logical sense. I also feel that all, yes all of his costumes should be available.