- Joined
- Aug 7, 2012
- Messages
- 9,582
- Location
- Buffalo, New York
- NNID
- ScoliosisxJones
- 3DS FC
- 1762-3194-1826
I don't think some of those are as bad as you're thinking.We don't really need much more of an explanation. I can go more in-depth, but it'd just explain each point that's all related to "Konami is an ********". Shall I attempt it?
Konami doesn't give a **** about their IP's except to make money off of them. Kojima has been royally screwed over by Konami, and he's the #1 reason why Snake was in Smash to begin with. They're not even regarding MGSV as "A Hideo Kojima Game" anymore. Right now, MGS is still a property that's making them money, and they'll not be likely to give up that crap any time soon.
Konami was willing to license off one old dead Hudson Soft IP over to Nintendo. This is true. Maybe they'd license off more, but again, these are dead IP's that Konami doesn't give a crap about. MGSV is still making them money, and its one of their biggest IP's. After Kojima leaves they'll still want to shove it off somewhere.
The big picture here is how Nintendo plays into this. Sakurai added Snake because of Kojima primarily. If they go to Konami to try and get Snake, they no longer have Kojima to deal with. First, Konami might attempt to make a ridiculous licensing deal to squeeze more money out of it. That's pretty bad as is, but let's say they're nice.
Kojima and Sakurai are friends. Kojima and Konami are at extreme odds with one another right now. With all the tension in the company right now, I don't think this is something Nintendo would want to get involved in at all, let alone the possibility of Konami charging an obscene amount of money to license Snake.
Then there's also one other factor--the game's rating. Brawl was rated T, this game is rated E-10+. Snake might just be the push needed to make that a T again, and they don't want to do that. So this is another factor they really need to worry about.
I also heard that it cost Nintendo a lot to contract David Hayter to do Snake's voice. Now with David Hayter no longer being used, Konami would likely ask them to completely re-record his lines with Keith Sutherland instead. Not sure how that would go. They might even want Snake to be updated to Big Boss's design to promote MGSV, which would also add to the development time for adding the character.
Sure, Kojima and Konami are at odds. But it's still his character. He still wants Snake in Smash. Why would he care if Sakurai managed to get him in? if they charge too much, that's one thing. But Kojima v Konami isn't really a problem the way I see it. Kojima is in full support of Snake in Smash.
Not to mention, we got Mega Man without his creator. Granted I understand Snake isn't the same as Mega Man in terms of getting added.
I don't think Snake would put the rating over the edge. I don't even think Brawl was rated Teen because of him. Melee was rated teen without him.
If we're going to talk money, Snake being in Smash alone makes Konami money. I mean either way, any company that wants their character in is in it for the money.
I understand the other points, but those are purely speculation and not necessarily going to be an issue. I think people blow the Konami thing out of proportion.
---
Good stuff though for K.Rool though. Great to see some recognition!