clubbadubba
Smash Master
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2011
- Messages
- 4,086
Can you provide me some evidence? 64 Was basically melee with different movesets and less techskill, then brawl was just melee with flashier graphics and practically no techskill availability... P:M on the other hand is awesome
Dude, and I mean this in the gentlest way possible, that is one of the most ignorant statements I have ever read. If you've played both games, you'd know that 64 and melee not only have different movesets and tech options, but the physics of the two games is completely different. The 64 chars are floatier than their melee counterparts. The DI in both games functions in different ways (yes 64 has DI!!!!!). Most importantly, 64 moves have a HUGE amount of hitstun, which is the backbone of the entire game. It causes 64 to be focused largely around combo's, much more so than melee. The differences between the games goes far beyond players movesets.64 Was basically melee with different movesets and less techskill
See what you did here is assume that more techskill means a better game, when in reality that is a just your personal preference. Some people prefer not to have to focus on the tech skill for hours a day, I am one of those people. However, others find that experience rewarding, hence they enjoy melee more. Good for them. The point is that none of the smash games are objectively better than the others, they all have their appeal to certain players (yes even brawl guys lol). Can we provide you evidence? I cannot think of a single piece of evidence that would prove one game to be "better" than the other, so no.